Reduced-dose radiotherapy for Epstein-Barr virus DNA selected staged III nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy-related toxicities of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) caused by a standard dose of 70 Gy remain a critical issue. Therefore, we assessed whether a radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy was non-inferior to the standard dose in patients with low-risk stage III NPC with a favourable response to induction chemotherapy (IC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We did a single-arm, single-centre, phase II clinical trial in China. Patients with low-risk (Epstein-Barr virus [EBV] DNA level <4000 copies/ml) stage III NPC were treated with two cycles IC. Patients with complete/partial response and undetectable EBV DNA level were assigned 60 Gy intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrently with three cycles of cisplatin. The primary end-point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03668730. RESULTS: One patient quit because of withdrawal of informed consent after IC. In total, 215 patients completed two cycles of IC, after which 116 (54.0%) and 99 (46.0%) patients were assigned 60 and 70 Gy radiotherapy, respectively. For 215 patients, the 2-year PFS was 90.7% (95% CI, 86.8%-94.6%) with a median follow-up of 43.9 months (interquartile range [IQR], 39.8-46.2). For patients treated with 60 Gy radiotherapy, the 2-year PFS rate was 94.8% (95%CI 90.7%-98.9%) with a median follow-up of 43.9 months (IQR 40.2-46.2). The most common late toxicity was grade 1-2 dry mouth (incidence rate: 54.3%). No grade 3+ long-term adverse event was observed, and most quality-of-life items, domains, and symptom scores returned to baseline by 6 months. CONCLUSION: Reduced-dose radiation (60 Gy) is associated with favourable survival outcomes and limited treatment-related toxicities in patients with low-risk stage III NPC sensitive to IC.

Prognostic value of metastatic cervical lymph node stiffness in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Extracellular matrix stiffness plays an important role in tumorigenesis. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of metastatic cervical lymph node (CLN) stiffness measured using ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 325 consecutive patients with NPC and CLN metastases were prospectively enrolled in this study. The association between the CLN stiffness and patient characteristics was also evaluated. Survival analysis was performed for 307 patients with stage M0 disease. Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was the primary endpoint. Log-rank test and multivariate analysis were used to explore the prognostic value of CLN stiffness. RESULTS: Eighteen patients developed distant metastases before treatment (stage M1) and had significantly higher CLN stiffness (Pt-test < 0.001) than the other patients (stage M0). For stage M0 patients, those in the high-stiffness group had lower 3-year DMFS (83.3% vs. 91.7%, P = 0.013) and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) (78.2% vs. 87.9%, P = 0.015) than those in the low-stiffness group. Multivariate analysis identified CLN stiffness and pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA as independent prognostic factors for DMFS and PFS. We further established stiffness-EBV risk stratification based on these two factors. The concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analyses showed that our risk stratification outperformed the TNM classification for predicting metastasis. CONCLUSION: The stiffness of metastatic CLN is closely associated with the prognosis of patients with NPC. SWE can be used as a pretreatment examination for CLN-positive patients. A multicenter study is required to verify our results.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine versus cisplatin-fluorouracil chemotherapy for N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma have a high risk of treatment being unsuccessful despite the current practice of using a concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-fluorouracil regimen. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine with cisplatin-fluorouracil in N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial at four cancer centres in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with untreated, non-keratinising, stage T1-4 N2-3 M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 1, 22, and 43 of intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by either gemcitabine (1 g/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously for 4 h on day 1) once every 3 weeks or fluorouracil (4 g/m2 in continuous intravenous infusion for 96 h) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously for 4 h on day 1) once every 4 weeks, for three cycles. Randomisation was done using a computer-generated random number code with a block size of six, stratified by treatment centre and nodal category. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of chemoradiotherapy. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03321539, and patients are currently under follow-up. FINDINGS: From Oct 30, 2017, to July 9, 2020, 240 patients (median age 44 years [IQR 36-52]; 175 [73%] male and 65 [27%] female) were randomly assigned to the cisplatin-fluorouracil group (n=120) or cisplatin-gemcitabine group (n=120). As of data cutoff (Dec 25, 2022), median follow-up was 40 months (IQR 32-48). 3-year progression-free survival was 83·9% (95% CI 75·9-89·4; 19 disease progressions and 11 deaths) in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 71·5% (62·5-78·7; 34 disease progressions and seven deaths) in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group (stratified hazard ratio 0·54 [95% CI 0·32-0·93]; log rank p=0·023). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events that occurred during treatment were leukopenia (61 [52%] of 117 in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group vs 34 [29%] of 116 in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group; p=0·00039), neutropenia (37 [32%] vs 19 [16%]; p=0·010), and mucositis (27 [23%] vs 32 [28%]; p=0·43). The most common grade 3 or worse late adverse event (occurring from 3 months after completion of radiotherapy) was auditory or hearing loss (six [5%] vs ten [9%]). One (1%) patient in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group died due to treatment-related complications (septic shock caused by neutropenic infection). No patients in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group had treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine could be used as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, although long-term follow-up is required to confirm the optimal therapeutic ratio. FUNDING: National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research, Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangzhou City, Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program, Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Distinguished Young Scholar, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program, Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou, Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, Key Youth Teacher Cultivating Program of Sun Yat-sen University, the Rural Science and Technology Commissioner Program of Guangdong Province, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

First-Line Immunochemotherapy Versus Palliative Chemotherapy Plus Definitive Radiation Therapy for de novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The combined use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with palliative chemotherapy (PCT) is a promising first-line treatment for de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC). However, the efficacy of ICIs with PCT vs PCT with definitive radiation therapy (DRT) remain unclear. METHODS: Patients with mNPC who received first-line immunochemotherapy (ICI + PCT) or PCT + DRT were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance potential confounders between patients who did and did not undergo DRT (at a ratio of 1:1). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the 2 groups using a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Among all participants, 149 received ICI + PCT. After PSM, 149 patients were included in the PCT + DRT group. First-line immunochemotherapy was associated with significantly improved PFS (median 9.0 months vs 12.0 months, P < .001) and OS (median 12.5 months vs 19.9 months, P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that tumor response to immunochemotherapy, metastatic organs, and number of metastatic sites potentially affected the efficacy of DRT after first-line immunochemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Compared with PCT + DRT, first-line immunochemotherapy was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with mNPC but not in patients with unfavorable tumor response and metastasis involving the liver, distant nodes, or multiple sites.

The Prognostic Role of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Levels in the Middle of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy to Guide Cisplatin Dose Recommendation in Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Large Cohort Study.

Purpose: Our purpose was to investigate the prognostic role of plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels in the middle of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials: In total, 1881 patients with stage III-IVa tumors were included. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences were compared using the log-rank test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to analyze the diagnostic value of EBV DNA levels for tumor progression or death. Multivariate analyses using the Cox model were used to evaluate potential prognostic factors. Results: The positive predict value and negative predict value of plasma EBV DNA > 0 copies/mL in the middle of IMRT in predicting nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression was 37.4% and 85.5%, respectively. In patients with plasma EBV DNA level = 0 copies/mL, no significant differences in OS were observed between patients treated with 200 mg/m² cisplatin and those treated with >200 mg/m² cisplatin (5-year OS, 94.9% vs 94.4%; PFS, 81.5% vs 87.6%). However, those treated with >200 mg/m² cisplatin had higher PFS. In patients with plasma EBV DNA level > 0 copies/mL, patients treated with >200 mg/m² cisplatin displayed a favorable 5-year OS (84.6% vs 73.9%) and PFS (72.3% vs 54.8%) compared with those treated with 200 mg/m² cisplatin. Additionally, higher incidences of grade 3 and 4 adverse events were recorded in patients treated with >200 mg/m² cisplatin than in those treated with 200 mg/m² cisplatin. Conclusions: Plasma EBV DNA > 0 copies/mL in the middle of IMRT suggests that higher doses of chemotherapy should be used. For concurrent chemoradiation therapy, >200 mg/m² cisplatin is recommended for patients with plasma EBV DNA level > 0 copies/mL in the middle of IMRT but not for patients with plasma EBV DNA level = 0 copies/mL considering the similar OS rates.

Determining the suitability of definitive radiation therapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on PET/CT: a large cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) who would benefit from receiving definitive radiation therapy (DRT) along with their pre-existing palliative chemotherapy (PCT) by evaluating their post-PCT Deauville scores and EBV DNA. METHODS: A total of 570 mNPC patients, treated with PCT or PCT+DRT, were studied. EBV DNA levels, along with post-PCT Deauville scores, were used to stratify risk based on the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the survival rates of patients with Deauville scores of 1-3 and 4-5 (2-year progression-free survival (PFS): 23.4% versus 8.5%, p < 0.001; 2-year overall survival (OS): 56.8% versus 18.8%, p < 0.001). RPA yielded three distinct groups in the increasing order of risk (Deauville scores of all RPA I-II were within the range of 1-3): (1) RPA I: EBV DNA levels at a pretreatment concentration ≤ 4000 copies/mL and undetectable post-PCT; (2) RPA II: EBV DNA levels either at a pretreatment concentration > 4000 copies/mL or at a pretreatment concentration ≤ 4000 copies/mL and detectable post-PCT; (3) RPA III: Deauville scores 4-5. While patients in RPA I and RPA II had significantly PFS rates when treated with PCT+DRT than when treated with PCT alone (RPA I: 72.7% versus 13.4%, RPA II: 37.8% versus 6.3%), those in RPA III did not experience such PFS benefits (6.5% versus 9.7%). CONCLUSION: PCT+DRT might improve the survival rates in mNPC patients in the low- and mid-risk strata but not those of patients in the high-risk strata. KEY POINTS: We use the Deauville scores and the concentrations of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA to determine those patients with de novo metastatic NPC who would benefit from radiation therapy.

Cost-Effectiveness analysis of combining plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA testing and different surveillance imaging modalities for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in first remission.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of stage-based post-radiotherapy (PRT) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) surveillance strategies. METHODS: Four post-radiotherapy surveillance strategies were established by a Markov model based on data from 1664 patients: 1) clinical follow-up (CFP) with biannual Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA (EBV DNA strategy); 2) CFP with biannual EBV DNA, annual head and neck magnetic resonance imaging (HNMRI), chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography, bone scan (only for the first two years) for five years (MCWU strategy); 3) CFP with biannual EBV DNA, annual HNMRI, chest, abdomen, pelvic computerized tomography (CT) and bone scan for the first two years, followed by annual MCWU strategy (without bone scans) for the last three years (CT strategy); 4) CFP with biannual EBV DNA, annual whole-body positron emission/computerized tomography (PET/CT) for the first two years and biannual EBV DNA for the last three years (PET/CT strategy). RESULTS: Compared with the EBV DNA strategy, the MCWU, CT, and PET/CT strategies gained 0.017, 0.047, and 0.082 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for stage I-II patients. For stage III and IVa patients, the PET/CT strategy had a favorable incremental effectiveness (ICERs) of 0.277 and 0.385 QALY, respectively. The ICERs for the MCWU, CT, and PET/CT strategies were $74,037, $34,882, and $34,696 for stage III and $62,364, $27,981, and $28,340 for stage IVa, respectively. CONCLUSION: EBV DNA strategy was cost-effective for the long-term surveillance of stage I-II NPC patients with CR. PET/CT strategy was recommeded for patients having IVa NPC. As for stage III NPC, PET/CT strategy was still acceptable with the development of economy in China.

Definitive radiation therapy and liver local therapy in de novo liver metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Large cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate patients suitable for definitive radiation therapy (DRT) and liver local therapy (LLT) in addition to palliative chemotherapy (PCT) among those with de novo liver metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (lmNPC). METHODS: The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated and compared in 610 patients with lmNPC. RESULTS: Both the PCT+DRT and PCT+DRT+LLT groups had better survival outcomes than the PCT group. Among patients with complete response/partial response (CR/PR) after PCT, no significant differences in survival rates were observed between those treated with PCT+DRT and PCT+DRT+LLT (2-year PFS: 27.0% vs. 32.9%, p = 0.263). Among patients with progressive disease/stable disease (PD/SD) after PCT, significantly better survival rates were observed in patients treated with PCT+DRT+LLT. CONCLUSIONS: DRT might benefit patients with lmNPC regardless of the tumor response after PCT. For patients with CR/PR, LLT might not be needed. For patients with PD/SD, LLT might improve survival outcomes.

Impact of salvage radiotherapy on survival of patients with advanced locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Derivation and validation of a predictive model.

BACKGROUND: Salvage radiotherapy (RT) is a potentially curative approach for advanced locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but it is associated with severe toxicities. We aimed to develop a model to predict which patients would benefit from salvage RT. METHODS: A total of 809 patients who were diagnosed with advanced locally recurrent NPC and treated with salvage RT or palliative chemotherapy (CT) at a high-volume cancer center were included. Patients were randomly split into a training and validation set and matched using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Candidate variables associated with heterogeneous treatment effects were identified with interaction terms in Cox model and incorporated into Salvage Radiotherapy Outcome Score (SARTOS). RESULTS: The final model included five interaction terms indicating that female sex, presence of prior RT-induced grade ≥ 3 late toxicities and suboptimal performance status were associated with less benefit from salvage RT. SARTOS from the model significantly predicted treatment effects of salvage RT in matched training (Pinteration < 0.001) and validation cohorts (Pinteration = 0.027). Of patients in high SARTOS subgroup, salvage RT significantly improved survival versus palliative CT in matched training (3-year OS 67.3% vs. 42.0%, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.82, P = 0.005) and validation cohorts (3-year OS 71.8% vs. 22.8%, HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.97, P = 0.042); in low SARTOS subgroup, salvage RT failed to induce survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the SARTOS model could identify a subgroup of patients who benefit from salvage RT versus palliative CT, which helps personalize treatment recommendations for patients with recurrent NPC.

Deintensified Chemoradiotherapy for Pretreatment Epstein-Barr Virus DNA-Selected Low-Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Phase II Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

PURPOSE: Cumulative doses of 200 mg/m2 for concurrent cisplatin (DDP) were indicated by retrospective studies as sufficient in conferring survival benefit for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). We performed an open-label, phase II, randomized, controlled trial to test the noninferiority of a two-cycle 100 mg/m2 concurrent DDP regimen over three-cycle in patients with low-risk LA-NPC with pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels < 4,000 copies/mL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive two cycles or three cycles concurrent DDP-based chemoradiotherapy. The primary end point was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points included overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, etc. RESULTS: Between September 2016 and October 2018, 332 patients were enrolled, with 166 in each arm. After a median follow-up of 37.7 months, the estimated 3-year PFS rates were 88.0% in the two-cycle group and 90.4% in the three-cycle group, with a difference of 2.4% (95% CI, -4.3 to 9.1, Pnoninferiority = .014). No differences were observed between groups in terms of PFS, overall survival, and the cumulative incidences of locoregional relapse and distant metastasis. Patients in the three-cycle group developed significantly more grade 3-4 mucositis (41 [24.8%] v 25 [15.1%]), hyponatremia (26 [15.8%] v 14 [8.4%]), and dermatitis (9 [5.5%] v 2 [1.2%]). The overall all-grade and grade 3-4 toxicity burdens were heavier in three-cycle group (T-scores, 12.33 v 10.57, P < .001 for all grades; 1.76 v 1.44, P = .05 for grade 3-4). Patients in the three-cycle group also showed more all-grade hearing impairment, dry mouth and skin fibrosis, and impaired long-term quality of life. CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus two cycles of concurrent 100 mg/m2 DDP could be an alternative treatment option for patients with low-risk LA-NPC.

Management of first-line palliative chemotherapy for post-treatment metastasis after gemcitabine plus cisplatin induction chemotherapy: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin and non-gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether patients with post-treatment metastasis are suitable for GP first-line palliative chemotherapy (PCT) after undergoing GP IC. METHODS: Seven hundred and forty-six patients with post-treatment metastasis after undergoing GP IC were eligible. Survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Significant differences in survival rates were observed between patients treated with GP and non-GP chemotherapy (2-year progression-free survival [PFS]: 0.7% vs. 9.7%). We investigated survival outcomes of patients treated with GP PCT within 2 years after undergoing GP IC, treated with GP PCT 2 years after undergoing GP IC, and those of non-GP PCT patients (2-year PFS: 0.0%, 2.3%, 9.7%). However, there was no difference in the 2-year PFS between the patients that received GP PCT 2 years after undergoing GP IC and the non-GP PCT treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: GP is not recommended for patients that have received GP IC within 2 years. Two years after undergoing GP IC, GP can be considered.

Effect of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin vs Cisplatin on the Long-term Outcomes of Survival and Toxic Effects Among Patients With Stage II to IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A 5-Year Follow-up Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) regimen at 2 years was noninferior to cisplatin-based regimen in patients with locoregional, stage II to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and was associated with fewer late adverse events, but longer-term outcomes and toxicity are unclear. Objective: To evaluate the 5-year outcomes and late toxicity profile of nedaplatin-based CCRT in patients with locoregional, stage II to IVB NPC. Design, Settings, and Participants: This 5-year follow-up secondary analysis of an open-label, noninferiority, multicenter randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with nonkeratinizing stage II to IVB NPC between January 16, 2012, and July 16, 2014, with a median follow-up duration of 78 months (IQR, 3-99 months). Data analysis was conducted from November 10, 2020, to July 8, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nedaplatin (100 mg/m2)- or cisplatin (100 mg/m2)-based chemotherapy every 3 weeks for 3 cycles concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival. Results: A total of 402 eligible participants were enrolled (median [IQR] age, 45 [18-65] years; 302 [75.1%] male). Patients were randomly assigned to receive nedaplatin- or cisplatin-based CCRT (n = 201 for each): 196 patients (97.5%) started nedaplatin-based CCRT and 197 patients (98.0%) started cisplatin-based CCRT. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 81.4% (95% CI, 75.9%-86.9%) for the cisplatin group and 79.8% (95% CI, 74.1%-85.5%) for nedaplatin group, with a difference of 1.6% (95% CI, -6.3% to 9.5%; P = .002 for noninferiority). No significant survival differences were observed between the cisplatin and nedaplatin groups for 5-year overall survival (89.4% vs 88.8%, P = .63), distant metastasis-free survival (85.9% vs 90.4%, P = .17), and locoregional relapse-free survival (92.6% vs 89.6%, P = .17) rates. The cisplatin group had a higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 auditory toxic effects than the nedaplatin group (35 [17.7%] vs 21 [10.5%], P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, long-term analysis confirmed that nedaplatin-based CCRT could be regarded as an alternative doublet treatment strategy to cisplatin-based CCRT in stage II to IVB NPC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01540136.

Alpha-fetoprotein-producing recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A case report.

Alpha-fetoprotein hardly increased due to nasopharyngeal cancer. In this article, we reported a 57-year-old male nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient who had posttreatment subscapular metastasis with high serum alpha-fetoprotein but negative plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA. Pathology results indicated that the scapular mass was undifferentiated non-keratinizing carcinoma originated in the nasopharynx. Moreover, no liver lesion was detected by imaging examination. In view of the positive alpha-fetoprotein and alpha-fetoprotein messenger RNA staining result in the right scapular mass fine needle aspiration biopsy sample, we considered the diagnosis of alpha-fetoprotein-producing nasopharyngeal carcinoma that had never been reported before.

Development and validation of a normal tissue complication probability model for acquired nasal cavity stenosis and atresia after radical radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Curative radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) can lead to acquired nasal cavity stenosis and atresia (ANCSA). As the first study to investigate risk factors of ANCSA in a large cohort of NPC patients, this article aims to develop and validate a multivariate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model to predict the development of ANCSA and to establish a nomogram for clinical use. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The retrospective cohort was comprised of 548 NPC patients treated with radical radiotherapy. The cohort was randomly divided into training and validation groups. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was performed for variable selection from the clinical and dosimetric characteristics in the training group. A multivariate NTCP model and a nomogram were established for the prediction of ANCSA development. Discrimination and calibration were tested using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration tests, respectively, for both groups. RESULTS: ANCSA was observed in 132 (24.1%) of 548 patients with NPC who underwent radical radiotherapy. The median time to ANCSA detection after treatment was 2.8 months (range, 0.0-57.7 months). Five potential predictors, including choanal invasion, low white blood cell count, high C-reactive protein level, high serum amyloid A level, and high V70Gy of the nasal cavity, were selected to develop the NTCP model based on 365 patients in the training group. The model had a fairly good discriminative power according to the ROC analysis in both the training (area under ROC curve = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.73-0.84) and validation (0.73, 0.64-0.82) groups. The calibration power was tested using the calibration test in the training (E-max = 0.069, E-avg = 0.015, p = 0.977) and validation (E-max = 0.057, E-avg = 0.032, p = 0.747) groups. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and successfully validated an NTCP model for early prediction of ANCSA in patients with NPC after radical radiotherapy. This could help clinicians assess the risk of ANCSA before the initiation of follow-ups and ensure appropriate and timely management of this complication.

Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram to predict early metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients within six months after radiotherapy and to guide intensive treatment.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish an effective prognostic nomogram to predict the risk of early metastasis (EM) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, as a guide for intensive treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 9021 patients with biopsy-confirmed NPC at our institute were enrolled in this study between December 2006 to December 2016. We randomized these patients using a proportion of 2/3 and 1/3 and selected 6044 and 2977 patients as the training and validation cohorts, respectively. All patients received radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistical regressions were used to identify independent risk factors. The nomogram's predictive value was evaluated by concordance indexes (C-indexes), calibration curves, probability density functions (PDFs), and clinical utility curves (CUCs). ROC analysis using Delong test was used to compare efficiency between the nomogram and other risk factors. RESULTS: In total, 174 (2.9%) and 81 (2.7%) patients in training and validation cohorts, respectively, had EM. Pretreatment plasma EBV DNA, N stage, LDH, ALP, BMI, and sex were independent predictive factors of EM. The C-indexes of nomogram were 0.756 (95% CI = 0.719-0.793) and 0.766 (95% CI = 0.720-0.813), in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The C-index of the nomogram was significantly superior to any one of independent factors. According to the PDFs and CUCs and considering the balance of the true positive EM patients and true positive non-EM patients, we chose 5.0% as a threshold probability for clinical decision-making, which could distinguish about 85% and 48% of non-EM and EM patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our nomogram had good accuracy in predicting EM incidence, and a 5.0% threshold was appropriate for clinical decision-making.

Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of different risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the efficiency and toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radiotherapy (RT) in different risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 1814 eligible patients with stage II-IVB disease treated with CCRT or IC plus RT were included. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Nomograms were developed to predict OS, PFS and DMFS (C-index: 0.71, 0.70 and 0.71, respectively). Patients were then divided into three different risk groups based on the scores calculated by the nomogram for OS. In the low and intermediate-risk group, no significant survival differences were observed between patients treated with IC plus RT alone and CCRT (5-year OS, 97.3% versus 95.6%, p = 0.642 and 87.6% versus 89.7%, p = 0.381, respectively; PFS, 95.9% versus 95.6%, p = 0.325 and 87.6% versus 89.0%, p = 0.160, respectively; DMFS, 97.2% versus 94.8%, p = 0.339 and 87.2% versus 89.3%, p = 0.628, respectively). However, in the high-risk group, IC plus RT displayed an unfavorable 5-year OS (71.0% versus 77.2%, p = 0.022) and PFS (69.4.0% versus 75.4%, p = 0.019) compared with CCRT. A significantly higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events was documented in patients treated with CCRT than in those treated with IC plus RT in all risk groups (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: IC followed by RT represents an alternative treatment strategy to CCRT for patients with low and intermediate-risk NPC, but it is not recommended for patients with high-risk NPC.

Comparing three induction chemotherapy regimens for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on TNM stage and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA level.

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy and toxicity of three IC regimens (TPF: taxanes, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil; TP: taxanes and cisplatin; and PF: cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) followed by CCRT in locoregionally advanced NPC. METHODS: The retrospective study involved 1354 patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IVA NPC treated with IC and CCRT. The median follow-up time in our cohort was 50 months. Based on EBV DNA level, all the patients with stage IV were divided into low- (pre-EBV DNA < 1500 copies) and high-risk group (pre-EBV DNA ≥ 1500 copies). Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and grade 3-4 toxicities were compared among different IC regimens. The survival rates were compared using log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A multivariate analysis revealed TPF to be more effective than TP. Among stage III patients, no significant difference in clinical outcome between the different IC regimens was showed, while TPF was associated with significantly better survival conditions in the stage IV patients. A further subgroup analysis revealed that only patients with pre-EBV DNA ≥ 1500 copies could benefit from the application of TPF among stage IV NPC. In terms of acute toxicities, PF was associated with fewer grade 3/4 acute toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: In low-risk NPC patients, PF-based IC showed similar efficacy as TPF and TP but was associated with fewer grade 3/4 acute toxicities. In high-risk patients, however, the TPF regimen was superior to PF and TP, although grade 3/4 toxicities were more common with the TPF regimen.

The impact of Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 on the clinical outcome of elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy: a matched cohort analysis.

Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic significance of Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) for elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), with or without chemotherapy. Methods: 206 elderly patients with locoregionally advanced NPC treated from December 2006 to December 2016 were involved into analysis as the training cohort. Besides, a separate cohort of 72 patients from the same cancer center collected between January 2003 and October 2006 served as the validation cohort. By using propensity score matching (PSM), we created a balanced cohort by matching patients who received chemoradiotherapy with patients who received IMRT alone. Treatment toxicities were calculated between CRT and RT groups using the χ2 test. The primary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS). Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the relative risk for each factor by using a Cox's proportional hazards regression model. Results: The median follow-up was 39.0 months (range = 3-137 months). In the PSM cohort, patients in the CRT group achieved comparable survival compared with patients in the RT group. The 3-year CSS rate was 64.3% and 65.2%, respectively (P =0.764). In multivariate analysis, the addition of chemotherapy to IMRT was not an independent prognostic factor for CSS, whereas a high ACE-27 score was an independent risk factor. In subgroup analysis with ACE-27 score ≥ 2, the 3-year CSS rate was worse in patients from the CRT group (63.5% vs. 46.3%, P = 0.041). Conclusions: CRT is comparable to IMRT alone for elderly patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. The ACE-27 tool may help to identify high-risk subgroup for poor disease outcome and tailor individualized treatment.

Optimal cumulative cisplatin dose in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on induction chemotherapy response.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients can be separated into two risk subgroups according to tumor responses to induction chemotherapy (IC). We aimed to elucidate the optimal cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for different NPC patient subgroups. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A total of 990 patients with incident NPC diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 treated with IC plus CCRT were included in our observational study. The clinicopathological features of patients with different tumor responses were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Prognosis was assessed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. In addition, acute and late toxicities were compared between different CCD groups. RESULTS: After IC, 761/990 (76.9%) patients had a complete tumor response (CR)/partial response (PR) and 229 (23.1%) had stable disease (SD)/disease progression (PD). An unsatisfactory tumor response (SD/PD) after IC correlated with poor clinical outcome (3-year PFS 61.4% vs. 83.2%, P < 0.001 and 3-year LRFS 80.9% vs. 94.5%, P < 0.001). Patients who achieved CR/PR after IC received a CCD >200 mg/m2 and showed higher 3-year PFS and DMFS rates than those receiving a CCD <100 mg/m2 (PFS: 85.4% vs. 77.9%, P = 0.045; DMFS: 89.4% vs. 77.9%, P = 0.015). Multivariate analysis also showed that CCD was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and DMFS in CR/PR subgroup. Moreover, the medium dose group showed similar efficacy as high dose group but was associated with fewer grade 1-4 acute toxicities. However, application of different CCD didn't result in significantly different survival outcomes in SD/PD subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor response to IC was an independent prognostic factor for patients with NPC. For the patients who achieved CR/PR after IC, patients receiving high CCD showed significantly improved 3-year PFS and DMFS compared with patients receiving low CCD. Balancing toxicity and efficacy, 200 mg/m2 seemed to be the optimal dose in the CR/PR groups. However, enhancement of CCD did not provide survival benefit for patients who achieved SD/PD after IC, and treatment options for these patients require further consideration.

Effect of local treatment for metastasis and its sequence with chemotherapy on prognosis of post-treatment metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Distant metastasis after chemoradiotherapy remains the leading cause of death in NPC patients. But the effect of local treatment for metastatic sites and its sequence with chemotherapy on prognosis of them are poorly documented. METHODS: 448 post-treatment metastatic NPC patients were included in our retrospective study. And Cox regression and log-rank tests were applied to investigate the association between topical treatment and its sequence with chemotherapy and survival using the propensity score method (PSM) to adjust for gender, age, Tumor stage, Node stage, metastatic sites, diabetes and smoking with a 1:2 matching protocol. RESULTS: The 3-year OS was significantly higher in patients who received local treatment of distant metastasis compared with patients who did not (48.8% vs 33.8%, P = 0.001) in primary cohort. PSM identified 120 patients in the cohort with local treatment and 240 in that without and similar survival benefits were observed for the local treatment (3-year OS: 36.2% versus 48.8%, P = 0.011). Subgroup analyses indicated that there was no significant survival difference in patients with different treatment sequence. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, post-treatment metastatic NPC patients could be beneficial from local treatment for metastasis but its sequence with palliative chemotherapy does not affect overall survival.