Usefulness of argon plasma coagulation for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia in patients at high risk or with limited endoscopic resectability.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is the standard treatment for superficial esophageal squamous-cell neoplasia (SESCN). However, we encounter patients in whom endoscopic resection is difficult to perform. We retrospectively studied the usefulness of argon plasma coagulation (APC) in patients with SESCN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 45 patients with SESCN (81 lesions) who underwent APC in our hospital from March 1999 through August 2016. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment time, the presence or absence of metastasis and recurrence, adverse events, and outcomes were studied. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 40 months. The median age was 70 years. The tumor diameter was 10 mm or longer in 48 lesions and less than 10 mm in 33 lesions. The median treatment time was 22 minutes. The reasons for selecting APC were as follows: technical difficulty caused by the presence of metachronous multiple lesions in the radiation field after chemoradiotherapy or close proximity to the ulcer scar remaining after endoscopic treatment in 49 lesions (60.4%), and the presence of underlying diseases in 26 lesions (32.0%). Adverse events occurred in 2 patients (4.4%) who had hypoxemia due to over-sedation. Two lesions (2.5%) recurred locally but could be locally controlled by additional APC. No patient had metastasis or recurrence or died of esophageal neoplasia. The 3-year overall survival rate was 87.0%, and the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 97.2%. CONCLUSION: APC can be a useful treatment option for SESCN in patients with a limited life expectancy, poor performance status, or technical difficulty in resection of superficial neoplasms.

Retrospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Depth of Invasion by Narrow Band Imaging Magnifying Endoscopy in Patients with Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Treatment strategies for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (S-ESCC) are determined mainly on the basis of the depth of invasion. We retrospectively studied the accuracy of the depth of tumor invasion, comprehensively assessed using the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) classification. METHODS: The study group comprised 256 patients who underwent narrow band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopy, and endoscopic submucosal dissection for S-ESCC. The depth of invasion of S-ESCC was classified into three groups: EP/LPM, MM/SM1, and SM2. The following variables were studied retrospectively: (1) the diagnostic accuracy of non-magnifying white-light endoscopy, (2) the diagnostic accuracy of type B vessels, (3) the diagnostic accuracy of avascular area (AVA), (4) the diagnostic accuracy of the JES classification, and (5) the diagnostic accuracy of comprehensive diagnosis. The depth of invasion was assessed by white-light non-magnifying endoscopy, followed by NBI magnifying endoscopy. RESULTS: The positive predictive value (PPV) of white-light non-magnifying endoscopy was 86% for EP/LPM, 53% MM/SM1, and 74% for SM2. The PPV of the diagnosis of type B vessels was 93% for EP/LPM, 62% for MM/SM1, and 74% for SM2. The PPV of the AVA diagnosis was 73% for EP/LPM, 89% for MM/SM1, and 100% for SM2. The PPV of diagnosis according to the JES classification was 93% for EP/LPM, 65% for MM/SM1, and 77% for SM2. The PPV of the comprehensive diagnosis was 94% for EP/LPM, 63%, for MM/SM1, and 75% for SM2. CONCLUSIONS: The additional use of NBI magnifying endoscopy can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the depth of invasion in patients with S-ESCC.

Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been performed in a high proportion of patients with superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (EAM) is a more straightforward technique that is easier to perform. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of EAM and ESD to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. METHODS: A total of 374 patients (423 lesions) who underwent endoscopic resection were retrospectively studied. The following variables were evaluated (1) procedure time and adverse events as safety, and (2) en bloc complete resection rate, local recurrence rate, lymph node recurrence rate, overall survival rate, and cause-specific survival rate as efficacy. RESULTS: EAM was performed in 134 patients (149 lesions), and ESD was performed in 240 patients (274 lesions). The procedure times of EAM and ESD were 31.0 ± 22.4 and 85.7 ± 46.5 min (p < 0.001), respectively. The perforation rates were 0 and 6.2% (p = 0.002), respectively. The en bloc complete resection rates were 48.3 and 91.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. The local recurrence rates were 5.5 and 0% (p < 0.001), respectively. For lesions measuring less than 15 mm in diameter, EAM had a relatively good en bloc complete resection rate (EAM, 76.1% vs. ESD, 100%) and a significantly short procedure time (EAM, 25.2 ± 15.2 min vs. ESD, 62.7 ± 35.2 min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ESD has a higher en bloc complete resection rate and a better local control rate than EAM. For lesions measuring less than 15 mm in diameter, EAM may be a treatment option.

A giant trichobezoar extracted by laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS).

A gastric bezoar is a mass that forms in the stomach. A giant gastric bezoar is particularly difficult to treat medically, and surgical therapy is selected. We describe our experience with a patient who had a giant gastric trichobezoar that was extracted by laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) in accordance with the principles of LECS. The patient was a 32-year-old woman who presented at our hospital because of abdominal pain. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy confirmed the presence of a giant gastric trichobezoar extending from the gastric cardia to the gastric angle. Because endoscopic removal was considered difficult, we extracted the giant gastric trichobezoar by LECS. The concurrent use of endoscopy was considered to allow a gastric bezoar to be extracted more safely and reliably than was previously possible.

Feasibility of definitive chemoradiation therapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of chemoradiation therapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients were aged 76 years or older, had a histopathologic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and were treated at the Kitasato University Hospital between January 2010 and March 2016. Chemotherapy consisted of nedaplatin in an intravenous dose of 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil in an intravenous dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5, repeated every 4 weeks for 2 cycles. Radiation therapy consisted of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions for thoracic tumors and 61.2 Gy for cervical tumors. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were studied. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 79 years (range, 76-85 years), clinical stage I/II/III/IV (7/8/8/2, respectively), and surgically resectable/unresectable (17/8, respectively). The completion rates of radiation therapy and chemoradiation therapy were 100% and 84%, respectively. Grade ≥3 acute toxicities included neutropenia (76%), leukopenia (72%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anemia (28%), anorexia (32%), oral mucositis (20%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and esophagitis (8%). Grade ≥3 late toxicities included esophageal stenosis (12%) and pleural effusion (4%). The complete response rate was 64%. In the median follow-up period of 18.9 months, the 1-year overall survival rate was 68%. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive chemoradiation therapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil may be a feasible treatment option for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Long-term outcomes of patients with early gastric cancer found to have lesions for which endoscopic treatment is not indicated on histopathological evaluation after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer treatment guidelines recommend additional surgery as the standard treatment for lesions for which endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is not indicated. However, the incidence of lymph-node metastasis is low in most patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study comprised 231 patients (231 lesions) who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer (EGC) in our hospital from September 2002 through March 2015 and were found to have lesions for which endoscopic treatment is not indicated on histopathological evaluation after ESD. The patients were divided into the additional operation group and the follow-up group, and long-term outcomes were studied retrospectively. Risk factors for metastasis and recurrence were also studied (capture rate, 98.7%). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 48 months. There were 174 men and 57 women with a median age of 72 years. The additional operation group comprised 118 patients, and the follow-up group comprised 113 patients. The rates of 5-year cause-specific survival and 5-year overall survival were significantly higher in the additional operation group (100 and 96.0%, respectively) than in the follow-up group (92.6 and 73.3%, respectively; p = 0.010, p < 0.001). In the follow-up group, 5 patients (4.4%) died of gastric cancer (p = 0.021). Among elderly patients 75 years or older, long-term outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Sixteen patients had metastasis or recurrence, and the presence of lymphatic involvement was an independent risk factor for metastasis, recurrence, or both (p = 0.003; odds ratio 10.594; 95% confidence interval 2.294-48.927). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with EGC who are confirmed to have lesions for which endoscopic treatment is not indicated on histopathological evaluation after ESD, additional surgery should be aggressively performed if the patient can tolerate such treatment. In elderly patients aged 75 years or older and patients with serious underlying diseases, follow-up observation was suggested to be one option in patients who give informed consent after receiving an explanation of the risk of recurrence.

Comparison of oral and intravenous lansoprazole for the prevention of bleeding from artificial ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric tumors: a prospective randomized phase II study (KDOG 0802).

BACKGROUND: Very few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of oral proton-pump inhibitors for the prevention of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric tumors. The aim of our study was to establish the non-inferiority of lansoprazole orally disintegrating (OD) tablets to intravenous lansoprazole for the prevention of bleeding from artificial ulcers after ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent ESD for gastric tumors were randomly assigned to receive lansoprazole OD tablets (OD group) or intravenous lansoprazole (IV group). In the OD group, lansoprazole OD tablets (30 mg) were given orally once daily for 8 weeks (56 days), starting on the day before ESD. In the IV group, lansoprazole (30 mg) was given as a continuous intravenous infusion twice daily for 3 days, starting on the day before ESD, and lansoprazole OD tablets (30 mg) were given orally once daily on days 4-56. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding events within 8 weeks after ESD. RESULTS: Among 310 enrolled patients, 304 patients (152 in the OD group and 152 in the IV group) were included in the analysis. Endoscopic hemostasis was performed in 38 patients (19 in the OD group and 19 in the IV group). The incidence of bleeding events within 8 weeks after ESD did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.487). Endoscopic hemostasis was performed at second-look endoscopy in 17 patients (11.2%) in the OD group and 19 patients (12.5%) in the IV group (difference, 1.3 percentage points; 90% confidence interval, - 4.8-7.4%; non-inferiority, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of lansoprazole OD tablets for the prevention of bleeding from artificial ulcers after ESD was similar to that of intravenous lansoprazole. Lansoprazole OD tablets are thus considered a treatment option in patients who undergo ESD.

Correction to: Long-term outcomes of patients with early gastric cancer found to have lesions for which endoscopic treatment is not indicated on histopathological evaluation after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

In Table 1, the second item in the right-hand column "Extra-indication" should be changed to "Out of indication". The correct version of Table 1 is displayed.

Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to clarify whether dental floss clip (DFC) traction improves the technical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: A superiority, randomized control trial was conducted at 14 institutions across Japan. Patients with single gastric neoplasm meeting the indications of the Japanese guidelines for gastric treatment were enrolled and assigned to receive conventional ESD or DFC traction-assisted ESD (DFC-ESD). Randomization was performed according to a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by institution, tumor location, tumor size, and operator experience. The primary endpoint was ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the end of the tumor removal procedure. RESULTS: Between July 2015 and September 2016, 640 patients underwent randomization. Of these, 316 patients who underwent conventional ESD and 319 patients who underwent DFC-ESD were included in our analysis. The mean ESD procedure time was 60.7 and 58.1 minutes for conventional ESD and DFC-ESD, respectively (P = .45). Perforation was less frequent in the DFC-ESD group (2.2% vs .3%, P = .04). For lesions located in the greater curvature of the upper or middle stomach, the mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the DFC-ESD group (104.1 vs 57.2 minutes, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that DFC-ESD does not result in shorter procedure time in the overall patient population, but it can reduce the risk of perforation. When selectively applied to lesions located in the greater curvature of the upper or middle stomach, DFC-ESD provides a remarkable reduction in procedure time.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary Site Treated By Gastrointestinal Oncologists.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with cancer of an unknown primary site (CUP), who were treated by gastrointestinal oncologists. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 29 patients with CUP who were presented at the Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital from October 2005 to October 2013, and were treated by the gastrointestinal oncologists. The patients were divided into two groups, namely chemotherapy group and symptomatic therapy group, and the clinical characteristics and survival times were compared. The clinical course was studied according to the histologic type (adenocarcinoma or non-adenocarcinoma), prognostic subset (favorable or unfavorable), and the presence or absence of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The chemotherapy group comprised 19 patients, and the symptomatic therapy group comprised 10 patients. The median survival time was 11 months in the chemotherapy group and 3 months in the symptomatic therapy group. Twenty-two patients had adenocarcinoma, and 7 had non-adenocarcinoma. Of the 22 patients with adenocarcinoma, 2 belonged to the favorable prognostic subset and received chemotherapy. One of these patients died of cancer at 47 months, and the other was alive and disease free at 58 months. Among the 20 patients with adenocarcinoma in the unfavorable prognostic subset, 16 received chemotherapy and had a median survival of 16 months. Seven (44%) of these patients survived for at least 21 months, and 3 patients who could receive 3 or more regimens survived for at least 46 months. CONCLUSION: It might be appropriate for gastrointestinal oncologists to treat CUP on the basis of clinical experience, depending on the situation.

Different clinical characteristics associated with acute bleeding and delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Few studies have classified risk factors according to the onset time of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (post-ESD bleeding). METHODS: We studied 1767 consecutive lesions in patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer from December 2006 through June 2016. Patients who had a remnant stomach or who had undergone reconstruction with a gastric tube were excluded. Post-ESD bleeding was classified into acute bleeding (0-5 days after ESD) and delayed bleeding (6 or more days after ESD), and the risk factors for each type of bleeding were compared. RESULTS: Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 150 (8.5%) of 1767 lesions. Bleeding was acute in 129 lesions (7.3%) and delayed in 21 (1.2%). Acute post-ESD bleeding was frequently associated with lesions located in the distal stomach, expanded indications or non-indicated lesions, a specimen diameter of ≥40 mm, and antithrombotic therapy. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was often associated with lesions located in the proximal stomach, hemodialysis, and antithrombotic therapy. Among 334 lesions in patients who received antithrombotic therapy, post-ESD bleeding occurred in 47 lesions (14.1%). Independent risk factors for post-ESD bleeding were a specimen diameter of ≥40 mm and treatment with 2 or more antithrombotic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Acute post-ESD bleeding and delayed post-ESD bleeding were associated with different clinical characteristics. Antithrombotic therapy is a risk factor for post-ESD bleeding in both the acute and delayed phases.

Aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone versus palonosetron and dexamethasone for prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a randomized crossover phase II trial (KDOG 1002).

We conducted a randomized trial to compare the safety and effectiveness of aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone (AGD) with those of palonosetron and dexamethasone (PD) in patients who received highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Patients with esophageal or gastric cancer who were scheduled to receive HEC including at least 60 mg/m of cisplatin as the first-line treatment were randomly assigned to receive AGD (oral aprepitant 125 mg on day 1 and 80 mg on days 2-3; intravenous granisetron 3 mg on day 1; intravenous dexamethasone 6.6 mg on day 1 and oral dexamethasone 4 mg on days 2-3) or PD (intravenous palonosetron 0.75 mg on day 1; intravenous dexamethasone 13.2 mg on day 1 and oral dexamethasone 8 mg on days 2-3). The primary endpoint was a complete response during the overall study period (0-120 h after the start of chemotherapy) in the first cycle. Eighty-five patients were enrolled, and 84 were eligible. The complete response rate did not differ between the treatment groups, but the proportion of patients with no vomiting was significantly higher in the AGD group than in the PD group (81.4 vs. 58.5%; P=0.031). The results of a quality-of-life survey indicated that the proportion of patients with no or minimal impact on daily life in the vomiting domain was significantly higher in the AGD group (79.1 vs. 53.7%; P=0.020). The primary endpoint of complete response was not achieved, but AGD seems to be more effective than PD for the prevention of HEC-induced vomiting.

Delayed perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: Clinical features and treatment.

Perforation is an important procedural complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. Although the incidence of delayed perforation after ESD is low, extreme caution is necessary because many cases require surgical intervention. Among 1984 lesions of early gastric cancer treated in our hospital by ESD in 1588 patients from September 2002 through March 2015, delayed perforation developed in 4 patients (4 lesions, 0.25%). A diagnosis of delayed perforation requires prompt action, including surgical intervention when required.