Higher diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in acute infection than chronic infection: a multicenter retrospective study.

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) vs. conventional culture methods (CM) in chronic infection and acute infection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of 88 patients with acute infection and 105 patients with chronic infection admitted to three hospitals from 2017 to 2022. Results: The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS were higher than those of CM. The number of patients who changed the antibiotic treatment in the mNGS positive group was larger than that of patients in the mNGS negative group in both the acute infection group (60.5 vs. 28.0%, P = 0.0022) and chronic infection group (46.2 vs. 22.6%, P = 0.01112). High levels of temperature (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.18-3.70, P: 0.015), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR: 15, 95% CI: 2.74-280.69, P: 0.011), neutrophil count (OR: 3.09, 95% CI: 1.19-8.43, P: 0.023), and low levels of lymphocyte count (OR: 3.43, 95% CI:1.26-10.21, P: 0.020) may lead to positive mNGS results in the acute infection group while no significant factor was identified to predict positive results in the chronic infection group. Conclusion: mNGS could provide useful guidance on antibiotic strategies in infectious diseases and may be more valuable for the diagnosis and treatment of acute infection vs. chronic infection.

Brochoscopic Airway Clearance Therapy vs. Conventional Sputum Aspiration: The Future of Flexible Brochoscopes in Intensive Care Units?

(1) Background: The aim of our study is to investigate the effectiveness of bronchoscopic airway clearance therapy (B-ACT) on severe pneumonia (SP) patients with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in the intensive care unit (ICU). (2) Methods: Our study retrospectively enrolled 49 patients with sputum aspiration and 99 patients with B-ACT, and the latter were divided into the ≤once every 3 days group (n = 50) and >once every 3 days group (n = 49). (3) Results: We found most laboratory blood results were significantly improved in the B-ACT group as compared with those in sputum aspiration group (p < 0.05). Patients in the B-ACT group and those in ≤once every 3 days group also had significantly better survival to hospital discharge than those in their counterpart groups (Logrank p < 0.001). In patients with cardiopulmonary diseases or positive cultures for bacteria, the B-ACT group and those in the ≤once every 3 days group had significantly better survival outcomes to discharge than those in their counterpart groups (Logrank p < 0.001). B-ACT and the average frequency of ≤once every 3 days had significantly better impact on survival outcomes than their counterpart groups (HR: 0.444, 95% CI: 0.238-0.829, p = 0.011; HR: 0.285, 95% CI: 0163-0.498, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: In the future, flexible bronchoscopes may paly an important role in ACT for SP patients with IMV.

The Clinical Characteristics and Treatments for Large Cell Carcinoma Patients Older than 65 Years Old: A Population-Based Study.

Background: Pulmonary large cell carcinoma, a type of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is a rare neoplasm with poor prognosis. In this study, our aim was to investigate the impact of radiation sequences with surgery for stage III/IV LCC patients between different age groups, especially in the elderly patients. Patients and Methods: The patients with LCC and other types of NSCLC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Then we divided the LCC patients into two age groups: <65 years old group and ≥65 years old group. Propensity score method (PSM) was used to control potential differences between different groups. The overall survival (OS) of LCC patients and other types of NSCLC patients were evaluated by Kaplan−Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were employed to explore the independent risk factors of OS. The forest plots of HRs for OS were generated to show the above outcomes more visually. Results: In total, 11,349 LCC patients and 129,118 other types of NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study. We divided LCC patients into <65 years old group (4300) and ≥65 years old group (7049). LCC patients was more common in whites (81.4%), males (58.3%), elderly (≥65 years old: 62.1%), east regions (52.7%), upper lobe (51.6%), right-origin of primary (55.4%), with advanced grade (54.2%) or stage (76.7%). After PSM, Kaplan−Meier analysis and multivariate Cox analysis showed significantly worse survival prognosis for LCC patients compared to other types of NSCLC, especially in the group ≥65 years old (HR: 1.230; 95% CI: 1.171−1.291; p < 0.001). For LCC patients, there were some risk survival factors including whites, males, not upper lobe, advanced stage, elder age at diagnosis, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, singled status, no lymphadenectomy, no surgery, and no chemotherapy (p < 0.05). In LCC patients ≥65 years old, radiation after surgery had significantly better impact on overall survival outcomes (HR: 0.863, 95% CI: 0.765−0.973, p = 0.016), whereas radiation prior to surgery (HR: 1.425, 95% CI: 1.059−1.916, p = 0.019) had significantly worse impact on prognosis of patients. In LCC patients <65 years old, radiation sequences with surgery had no significant impact on the OS of patients (p = 0.580), but ≥4 LNRs had significantly survival benefits to prognosis (HR:0.707, 95% CI: 0.584−0.855). Elderly LCC patients had worse malignant tumors than young patients, of which the majority were diagnosed as stage III/IV tumors. Conclusions: Postoperative radiotherapy may achieve a better prognosis for stage III/IV LCC patients older than 65 years old compared to other radiation sequences with surgery.

Exploration of the optimal number of regional lymph nodes removed for resected N0 NSCLC patients: A population-based study.

Background: The aim of our study was to explore the optimal number of regional lymph nodes removed (LNRs) in resected N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and identify potential risk factors. Methods: Included in this study were 55,024 N0 NSCLC patients between 2004 and 2015 based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER). All the patients were divided into No LNR group (57.8%), 1-3 LNRs group (8.1%) and ≥4 LNRs group (31.4%). Relevant clinical and patient parameters including overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), gender, race, year of diagnosis, primary site, T stage, AJCC stage, laterality, histological type, lymphadenectomy, radiation, chemotherapy, age at diagnosis, insurance status, marital status, family income. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated LNRs had significantly better OS and LCSS than No LNRs in all the N0 NSCLC patients with different T stages (Logrank p<.001). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that both OS and LCSS in ≥ 4 LNRs group were better than those in <1-3 LNRs group (OS: ≥4 LNRs group: HR, 0.583; 95%CI, 0.556-0.610; P<.001 vs.1-3 LNRs group: HR, 0.726; 95%CI, 0.687-0.769; P<.001; LCSS: ≥4 LNRs group: HR, 0.514; 95%CI, 0.480-0.550; P<.001 vs.1-3 LNRs group: HR, 0.647; 95%CI, 0.597-0.702; P<.001). In addition, whites, males, not upper lobe, large cell carcinoma and others, advance T stage or AJCC stage, no surgery, no LNR, no radiation, no chemotherapy, elder age at diagnosis, singled marital status and low family income had negative impact on prognosis of N0 NSCLC patients. Conclusions: Our study suggests that ≥ 4 LNRs can yield better survival outcomes compared with 1-3 LNRs in N0 NSCLC patients.

Advanced age is not the decisive factor in chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited research on the impact of chemotherapy on the prognosis of different age group patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of this study was to explore the impact of chemotherapy on survival prognosis of elderly patients with SCLC. METHODS: Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, 57,460 SCLC patients between 2004 and 2015 were identified and divided into a ≤ 80 years group (n = 50,941) and a >80 years group (n = 6,519). Confounding factors were controlled by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Kaplan Meier (KM) analysis was performed to determine the impact of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and lung-cancer specific survival (LCSS) of the patients. Other variables that could affect survival of SCLC patients were also examined by COX analysis. RESULTS: KM analysis showed that both OS and LCSS were improved in chemotherapy group compared to those in non-chemotherapy group (log rank P < 0.001) in both age groups after PSM. Cox analysis demonstrated the survival benefit of chemotherapy in both ≤ 80 years group (OS: HR 0.435; 95% CI 0.424-0.447; LCSS: HR 0.436; 95% CI 0.424-0.448) and >80 years group (OS: HR 0.424; 95% CI 0.397-0.451; LCSS: HR 0.415; 95% CI 0.389-0.444). Additionally, the following parameters had a negative impact on survival of elderly patients: male sex, tumor location in main bronchus, increased stage, bilateral tumor, no surgery or radiation, and lower median household income. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with SCLC should be encouraged to receive chemotherapy provided their general conditions permit.