Clinical implications of loss of bone marrow minimal residual disease negativity in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients frequently attain a bone marrow (BM) minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity status in response to treatment. We identified 568 patients who achieved BM MRD negativity following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and maintenance combination therapy with an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. BM MRD was evaluated by next-generation flow cytometry (sensitivity of 10-5 cells) at 3- to 6-month intervals. With a median follow-up of 9.9 years from diagnosis (range, 0.4-30.9), 61% of patients maintained MRD negativity, whereas 39% experienced MRD conversion at a median of 6.3 years (range, 1.4-25). The highest risk of MRD conversion occurred within the first 5 years after treatment and was observed more often in patients with abnormal metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities (95% vs 84%; P = .001). MRD conversion was associated with a high risk of relapse and preceded it by a median of 1.0 years (range, 0-4.9). However, 27% of MRD conversion-positive patients had not yet experienced a clinical relapse, with a median follow-up of 9.3 years (range, 2.2-21.2). Landmark analyses using time from ASCT revealed patients with MRD conversion during the first 3 years had an inferior overall and progression-free survival compared with patients with sustained MRD negativity. MRD conversion correctly predicted relapse in 70%, demonstrating the utility of serial BM MRD assessment to complement standard laboratory and imaging to make informed salvage therapy decisions.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an underrecognized disorder due to the variability of its presentation and the fact that in adults, its diagnosis is based on cumbersome, pediatric-based criteria. Data regarding demographics, underlying causes, clinical features, laboratory results, complications, treatments received, and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed in 41 patients who were diagnosed and treated at University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences between 2007 and 2019. In this group, 51% were male, the median age at diagnosis was 47 years, and 85% (35/41) met the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria (5/8 variables). When evaluating seven extended variables easily obtained by routine laboratory test, 93% (38/41) of patients met 8 out of 15 criteria. The overall mortality in our patient population was 54% (22/41). The 30-day and 1-year overall survival estimates were 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.84) and 0.46 (95% confidence interval 0.29, 0.62), respectively. Thirty-five patients (85.4%) received HLH-directed therapy, and 19 patients (46.3%) achieved remission. The most common regimen for treating HLH was dexamethasone plus etoposide (53.7%). The patients with malignancy-related HLH had a worse prognosis than those without underlying malignancy, with a 73.33% (11/15) vs 34.62% (9/26) mortality (P = 0.02). In conclusion, despite increasing recognition, HLH remains an enigmatic disorder with increased mortality, even more so with malignancy-associated HLH.

Genomic analysis of primary plasma cell leukemia reveals complex structural alterations and high-risk mutational patterns.

Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare and aggressive form of multiple myeloma (MM) that is characterized by the presence of ≥20% circulating plasma cells. Overall survival remains poor despite advances of anti-MM therapy. The disease biology as well as molecular mechanisms that distinguish pPCL from non-pPCL MM remain poorly understood and, given the rarity of the disease, are challenging to study. In an attempt to identify key biological mechanisms that result in the aggressive pPCL phenotype, we performed whole-exome sequencing and gene expression analysis in 23 and 41 patients with newly diagnosed pPCL, respectively. The results reveal an enrichment of complex structural changes and high-risk mutational patterns in pPCL that explain, at least in part, the aggressive nature of the disease. In particular, pPCL patients with traditional low-risk features such as translocation t(11;14) or hyperdiploidy accumulated adverse risk genetic events that could account for the poor outcome in this group. Furthermore, gene expression profiling showed upregulation of adverse risk modifiers in pPCL compared to non-pPCL MM, while adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix proteins became increasingly downregulated. In conclusion, this is one of the largest studies to dissect pPCL on a genomic and molecular level.

Nivolumab-induced immune-mediated neurotoxicity in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death-1 used to treat multiple cancers, has fewer side effects than traditional chemotherapy but has displayed a propensity to cause a host of immune-related adverse events. We describe a case of nivolumab immune-mediated neurotoxicity in a 42-year-old Hispanic man with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma who presented with unilateral facial droop, dysarthria, and dysphagia 1 week after receiving nivolumab. His symptoms rapidly improved with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and infliximab.

Immunotherapy Outcomes in Advanced Melanoma in Relation to Age.

INTRODUCTION: Older age is a melanoma risk factor. Elderly individuals are likelier to have immunosenescence, which could help melanoma cells escape immune surveillance. Hence, it is believed that elderly people cannot mount a potent immune response to checkpoint inhibitors to eliminate melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To investigate age-related differences in the time to progression, overall survival, and immunotherapy-related adverse events among patients with metastatic melanoma who received checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients at our institution between January 2012 and December 2016 with stage IV melanoma who received at least 1 dose of ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or combined ipilimumab and nivolumab. Demographic, pathologic, and clinical characteristics were obtained. Immune-related response criteria were used to define responses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were younger than age 65 years and 31 were age 65 years or older. Time to progression was comparable between the age groups (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.37-1.70, p = 0.46). Overall survival was not significantly different after immunotherapy between groups (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval = 0.31-1.82, p = 0.491). Overall, immunotherapy-related adverse events were comparable between groups, with 62% in younger patients (18/29) and 45% in older patients (14/31 p = 0.19). Of 60 patients, 30 responded to immunotherapy. Nonresponders were more likely than responders to have BRAF-mutated melanomas (16 [53.3%] vs 8 [27.6%]; p = 0.04) and less likely to have immunotherapy-related adverse events (12 [40%] vs 20 [66.7%]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Aging does not seem to affect response to checkpoint inhibitors. Elderly patients with metastatic melanoma should be treated similarly to younger patients.

Mechanisms of resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors and clinical update of US Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapy in advanced melanoma.

Approximately 50% of melanomas harbor an activating BRAF mutation. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibitors such as dabrafenib and trametinib, vemurafenib and cobimetinib, and encorafenib and binimetinib are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved to treat patients with BRAF V600-mutated advanced melanoma. Both genetic and epigenetic alterations play a major role in resistance to BRAF inhibitors by reactivation of the MAPK and/or the PI3K-Akt pathways. The role of BRAF inhibitors in modulating the immunomicroenvironment and perhaps enhancing the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors is gaining interest. This article provides a comprehensive review of mechanisms of resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors in melanoma and summarizes landmark trials that led to the FDA approval of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma.

High-dose interleukin-2 therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a contemporary experience.

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience of high-dose interleukin-2 (HDIL-2) in a high-volume National Cancer Institute-designated center for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: Patients with mRCC who received HDIL-2 monotherapy as a first- or second-line therapy during 2004-2011 were identified. Demographics, pathologic variables, renal function, time until the start of HDIL-2 therapy, number of cycles (1-3), responses (complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease), and primary renal cell carcinoma treatment were analyzed. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were determined. RESULTS: Of 906 patients in the kidney cancer database, 91 patients with mRCC were treated with HDIL-2 and 18 patients (20.5%) underwent prior cytoreductive nephrectomy. Median age was 51 years, and 73.9% were men. Median follow-up was 45 months. Pretreatment renal function impairment led to more treatment cycles (2-3) than in those with adequate initial kidney function (92.3% vs 50.6%, respectively; P = .002). Lower tumor stage correlated with a better response (P = .023) and with longer time from diagnosis to initiation of HDIL-2 (P = .011). Complications included hypotension (67.4%), renal impairment (63%), impaired liver function (42.4%), and thrombocytopenia (31.5%). Four patients (4.5%) had a complete response, 10 (11.4%) had a partial response, and 28 (31.8%) had a stable disease. Median progression-free survival and OS were 8.6 and 35.5 months, respectively. The estimated 2-year OS rate was 60.6%. CONCLUSION: Incorporating HDIL-2 therapy in the treatment strategies for mRCC added to the patients' survival in this series. HDIL-2 therapy is well tolerated in patients with pre-existing renal impairment with no long-term renal toxicity.

Major response to cyclophosphamide and prednisone in recurrent castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous cancer among men. This case report describes a 43-year-old man with rapidly progressing castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) that responded initially to docetaxel and did not tolerate cabazitaxel. He subsequently received a third line of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and prednisone, and experienced a dramatic clinical and radiographic response in his liver metastases. This therapeutic intervention led to a significant clinical benefit and confirms the potential use of cyclophosphamide in patients with CRPC, particularly those with liver metastases.