Comparing Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Valve-Sparing Versus Transannular Patch Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Transannular patch (TAP) repair of tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) relieves right ventricular tract obstruction but may lead to pulmonary regurgitation. Valve-sparing (VS) procedures can avoid this but there is potential for residual pulmonic stenosis. We aimed to evaluate clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of TAP and VS repair for ToF. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases was carried out to identify articles comparing conventional TAP repair and VS repair for ToF. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were meta-analyzed using random-effects models. RESULTS: 40 studies were included in this meta-analysis with data on 11,723 participants (TAP: 6,171; VS: 5,045). Participants that underwent a VS procedure experienced a significantly lower cardiopulmonary bypass time (MD: -14.97; 95% CI: -22.54, -7.41), shorter ventilation duration (MD: -15.33; 95% CI: -30.20, -0.46), and shorter lengths of both ICU (MD: -0.67; 95% CI: -1.29, -0.06) and hospital stay (MD: -2.30; 95% CI: [-4.08, -0.52). There was also a lower risk of mortality (RR: 0.40; 95% CI: [0.27, 0.60]) and pulmonary regurgitation (RR: 0.35; 95% CI: [0.26, 0.46]) associated with the VS group. Most other clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirms the well-established increased risk of pulmonary insufficiency following TAP repair, while also demonstrating that VS repairs are associated with several improved clinical outcomes. Continued research can identify the criteria for adopting a VS approach as opposed to a traditional TAP repair.

Healthcare Workers' Knowledge and Attitude Toward Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global Survey.

Introduction Telemedicine is the utilization of communication technologies to provide healthcare services remotely. It has an increasingly pivotal role in enabling medical professionals to extend the provision of care to patients facing geographical barriers. The benefits of telemedicine have become more apparent during the coronavirus pandemic. To maximize its application, it is crucial to ascertain the understanding and attitudes of healthcare professionals toward its use. The aim of this study is to collect data and evaluate the current knowledge and perceptions of medical staff toward the use of telemedicine. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we conducted a global survey of 1091 healthcare workers. Data were collected through a questionnaire after an extensive literature review. Frequency, percentages, and cumulative percentages were calculated to portray the profile of the participants. Results Of the respondents, the majority had heard about (90.9%), witnessed (65.3%), or were familiar with (74.6%) how telemedicine is used in practice. Seventy-two point two percent (72.2%) were familiar with the tools that may be used in this technology. The familiarity with telemedicine was noted to be consistently higher in those with a medical degree and experience of less than five years. Furthermore, attitudes toward providing healthcare remotely were generally positive with 80% thinking that telemedicine reduced staff workload, 80.6% reporting that it reduces the unnecessary transportation cost, and 83% believing that it saves clinicians' time. However, 20% of respondents said that telemedicine increases staff workload and 40.5% of healthcare workers believed telemedicine threatens information confidentiality and patient privacy. Conclusion Although telemedicine is a novel and emerging practice in many countries, it appears to have a promising contribution to healthcare services. This is particularly important during a pandemic, as it ensures effective healthcare with the maintenance of social distancing measures. Moreover, the respondents of this study showed good knowledge and positivity in their attitude toward telemedicine.

The inclination of undergraduate students at King Edward Medical University towards research and its perceived barriers and facilitators; a cross-sectional study.

Introduction: Research participation by medical students in the early years of their medical studies can change their attitude towards research conduction in the years to come. To identify the shortcomings in our system, it is essential to determine the perception, tendencies, and knowledge of Pakistani medical students about the field of research. Methods: This survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted at KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, Lahore with 305 MBBS students. The relevant data for the study was collected in the shape of a pretested, semi-structured questionnaire assembled in the form of google form. The collected data was analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 16. Results: 36.7% of the final year students have conducted research, however, the percentage comes down to 0% and 10.6% for 1st and 2nd year respectively. 50.6% of the final year students claimed they had a good grip on the steps involved in the conduction of research while the percentage for 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year was 7.1%, 21.3%, 20.9%, and 51.2% respectively. More than 70% of the participants from each year considered research as an important help for critical thinking and improvement in patients' care. Discussion: The reasons for the interest of the students in research as indicated by our study include improvement in the professional standards, help in becoming a better self-directed learner, and opportunities for team-based learning via research conduction. Academic overload, lack of structured research training, and difficulty in publishing are the biggest barriers to the conduction of research as recognized by our study. Conclusion: Conduction of research seminars, organizing platforms for communication between students and teaching staff, restructuring of the medical curriculum, and providing students with the required technical staff can help us overcome these hurdles.

An audit of foeticide, neonaticide and infanticide: A retrospective study in the Department of Forensic Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore.

The deliberate killing of a foetus in the womb, or a child from the first 24 h of birth to one month of age, or within the first year of life, is called foeticide, neonaticide and infanticide, respectively. Socioeconomic stress, mental illness, gender selection, shame or fear of punishment of adultery or illegitimacy, grudge and jealousy with parents and negligent delivery by dai are major causative factors in such cases. This is a retrospective, descriptive, observational study, and the sample pool consisted of 35 cases. Foeticide cases were 42.9% of the total and the same percentage of cases were neonaticides, while 14.3% of cases were of infanticide. The male-to-female ratio was 1.26:1 and the major cause of death was head injury. The study shows a prevalence of foeticide and neonaticide as compared to infanticide. It also displays the prevalence of males in overall cases and a higher number of unknown cases in our setting.