RESUMO
It is often difficult to distinguish acute renal failure clinically from chronic renal failure, especially in patients who do not have records of their medical history. We investigated the magnitude of iPTH increase in ARF and the potential role of iPTH as a marker for differential diagnosis of ARF and CRF in new patients referred to our renal unit. We prospectively analyzed 122 (ARF n = 64, CRF n = 58) patients referred to our renal unit with serum creatinine higher than 2 mg/dL. ROC curve analysis was performed to investigate role of iPTH for differentiating ARF from CRF. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of iPTH in discrimination of ARF and CRF were calculated. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the means of age, sex distribution, and serum chemistry between patients with ARF or CRF. But serum iPTH (p < 0.0001) levels were lower in patients with ARF than in those with CRF. A cutoff, set at 170 pg/mL for iPTH to discriminate patients with CRF, yielded a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 89%. This study confirms that the iPTH measurement is of clinical value in differentiating acute from chronic renal failure.
