A Phase 2b randomized trial of lorecivivint, a novel intra-articular CLK2/DYRK1A inhibitor and Wnt pathway modulator for knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Lorecivivint (LOR; SM04690), an investigational Wnt pathway modulator, previously demonstrated patient-reported and radiographic outcome improvements vs placebo in clinically relevant subjects with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study's objective was to identify effective LOR doses. DESIGN: Subjects in this 24-week, Phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial received an intra-articular injection of 2 mL LOR (0.03, 0.07, 0.15, or 0.23 mg), PBO, or dry-needle sham. The primary efficacy endpoints were changes in Pain NRS [0-10], WOMAC Pain [0-100], WOMAC Function [0-100], and radiographic mJSW outcomes, which were measured using baseline-adjusted analysis of covariance at Week 24. Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modeling (MCP-Mod) was performed for dose modeling. RESULTS: In total, 695/700 subjects were treated. Pain NRS showed significant improvements vs PBO after treatment with 0.07 mg and 0.23 mg LOR at Weeks 12 (-0.96, 95% CI [-1.54, -0.37], P = 0.001; -0.78 [-1.39, -0.17], P = 0.012) and 24 (-0.70 [-1.34, -0.06], P = 0.031; -0.82 [-1.51, -0.12], P = 0.022). Additionally, 0.07 mg LOR significantly improved WOMAC Pain and Function subscores vs PBO at Week 12 (P = 0.04, P = 0.021), and 0.23 mg LOR significantly improved both WOMAC subscores at Week 24 (P = 0.031, P = 0.017). No significant differences from PBO were observed for other doses. No radiographic progression was observed in any group at Week 24. MCP-Mod identified 0.07 mg LOR as the lowest effective dose. CONCLUSION: This 24-week Phase 2b trial demonstrated the efficacy of LOR on PROs in knee OA subjects. The optimal dose for future studies was identified as 0.07 mg LOR.

Modulation of the Wnt pathway through inhibition of CLK2 and DYRK1A by lorecivivint as a novel, potentially disease-modifying approach for knee osteoarthritis treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Wnt pathway upregulation contributes to knee osteoarthritis (OA) through osteoblast differentiation, increased catabolic enzymes, and inflammation. The small-molecule Wnt pathway inhibitor, lorecivivint (SM04690), which previously demonstrated chondrogenesis and cartilage protection in an animal OA model, was evaluated to elucidate its mechanism of action. DESIGN: Biochemical assays measured kinase activity. Western blots measured protein phosphorylation in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), chondrocytes, and synovial fibroblasts. siRNA knockdown effects in hMSCs and BEAS-2B cells on Wnt pathway, chondrogenic genes, and LPS-induced inflammatory cytokines was measured by qPCR. In vivo anti-inflammation, pain, and function were evaluated following single intra-articular (IA) lorecivivint or vehicle injection in the monosodium iodoacetate (MIA)-induced rat OA model. RESULTS: Lorecivivint inhibited intranuclear kinases CDC-like kinase 2 (CLK2) and dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A). Lorecivivint inhibited CLK2-mediated phosphorylation of serine/arginine-rich (SR) splicing factors and DYRK1A-mediated phosphorylation of SIRT1 and FOXO1. siRNA knockdowns identified a role for CLK2 and DYRK1A in Wnt pathway modulation without affecting ß-catenin with CLK2 inhibition inducing early chondrogenesis and DYRK1A inhibition enhancing mature chondrocyte function. NF-κB and STAT3 inhibition by lorecivivint reduced inflammation. DYRK1A knockdown was sufficient for anti-inflammatory effects, while combined DYRK1A/CLK2 knockdown enhanced this effect. In the MIA model, lorecivivint inhibited production of inflammatory cytokines and cartilage degradative enzymes, resulting in increased joint cartilage, decreased pain, and improved weight-bearing function. CONCLUSIONS: Lorecivivint inhibition of CLK2 and DYRK1A suggested a novel mechanism for Wnt pathway inhibition, enhancing chondrogenesis, chondrocyte function, and anti-inflammation. Lorecivivint shows potential to modify structure and improve symptoms of knee OA.

A small-molecule inhibitor of the Wnt pathway (SM04690) as a potential disease modifying agent for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVES: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease characterized by loss of cartilage and increased subchondral bone within synovial joints. Wnt signaling affects the pathogenesis of OA as this pathway modulates both the differentiation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes, and production of catabolic proteases. A novel small-molecule Wnt pathway inhibitor, SM04690, was evaluated in a series of in vitro and in vivo animal studies to determine its effects on chondrogenesis, cartilage protection and synovial-lined joint pathology. DESIGN: A high-throughput screen was performed using a cell-based reporter assay for Wnt pathway activity to develop a small molecule designated SM04690. Its properties were evaluated in bone-marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) to assess chondrocyte differentiation and effects on cartilage catabolism by immunocytochemistry and gene expression, and glycosaminoglycan breakdown. In vivo effects of SM04690 on Wnt signaling, cartilage regeneration and protection were measured using biochemical and histopathological techniques in a rodent acute cruciate ligament tear and partial medial meniscectomy (ACLT + pMMx) OA model. RESULTS: SM04690 induced hMSC differentiation into mature, functional chondrocytes and decreased cartilage catabolic marker levels compared to vehicle. A single SM04690 intra-articular (IA) injection was efficacious in a rodent OA model, with increased cartilage thickness, evidence for cartilage regeneration, and protection from cartilage catabolism observed, resulting in significantly improved Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histology scores and biomarkers, compared to vehicle. CONCLUSIONS: SM04690 induced chondrogenesis and appeared to inhibit joint destruction in a rat OA model, and is a candidate for a potential disease modifying therapy for OA.

A novel Wnt pathway inhibitor, SM04690, for the treatment of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee: results of a 24-week, randomized, controlled, phase 1 study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory efficacy of SM04690, a novel Wnt pathway inhibitor, as a potential disease modifying treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Subjects with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 knee OA were randomized in successive dose-escalation cohorts to receive a knee intra-articular (IA) injection with 0.03, 0.07, or 0.23 mg SM04690, or placebo (PBO) (4:1 ratio). Safety, pharmacokinetics, efficacy (WOMAC Total/Function/Pain, Pain VAS, Physician Global Assessment [MDGA], and OMERACT-OARSI Response), OA-related biomarker (P1NP, ß-CTX, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein [COMP]), and radiographic/imaging data were collected at baseline and during 24-week follow-up. RESULTS: 61 subjects (SM04690 n = 50; PBO n = 11) enrolled. Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), increased pain following injection and paroxysmal tachycardia (also the single serious AE), were reported in the 0.07 mg cohort. A total of 72 AEs were reported; Sixteen (occurring in eight subjects) were considered related to study medication. There were three discontinuations; one due to an AE (0.03 mg cohort). Bone marrow edema (BME) remained constant for most subjects. No doses were excluded from further study due to DLT criteria. Plasma levels of SM04690 were below the limit of detection at all time points. At Week 24, improvements from baseline were seen in all cohorts for the exploratory measures WOMAC Total, WOMAC Function, WOMAC Pain, MDGA, Pain VAS, and OMERACT-OARSI response. Joint space width (JSW) improvement was observed in the 0.07 mg cohort (P = 0.02 vs PBO). CONCLUSION: SM04690 appeared safe and well tolerated, with no evidence of systemic exposure. Exploratory efficacy analyses suggested positive trends for measurements of OA pain, function and disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) properties. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02095548.

Results of a questionnaire on the treatment of patients with Behçet's syndrome: a trend for more intensive treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the preferred treatment for patients with Behçet's syndrome. METHODS: A questionnaire was given to all participants of the 2010 meeting of the International Society for Behçet's Disease. RESULTS: Forty-one respondents from 6 different subspecialties. In the case of a patient with (severe) posterior uveitis or parenchymal central nervous system (CNS) disease no consensus was seen. A diffuse spectrum of different schedules were given. In both uveitis and CNS disease the majority of respondents preferred treatment options consisting of combination systemic therapy and systemic corticosteroids. TNF was preferred as first line drug in uveitis in 7.5% and in severe uveitis in 32.5% of respondents. In parenchymal CNS disease TNF blockage was given by 17% of the respondents. EULAR guidelines regarding uveitis were followed by 12/40 physicians. In patients with a new deep vein thrombosis, 90% of respondents would intensify immunosuppression. More than half would also anticoagulate. CONCLUSIONS: Although consensus about how to treat patients with Behçet syndrome in different clinical situations is far from present, treatment has become more intensive when compared to 10-20 years ago. More uniformity should be sought for in the decision process in individual patients with Behçet's syndrome, regarding their treatment, as well as adhering to evidence, as presented in the EULAR guidelines, when present.

Greater remission rates in patients with early versus long-standing disease in biologic-naive rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept: a post hoc analysis of randomized clinical trial data.

OBJECTIVES: Current aim of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is to achieve remission in as many patients as possible. Rates of remission and clinical outcomes after treatment with abatacept in biologic-naive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with early disease and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) versus patients with ≥ 10 years of disease were assessed. METHODS: Data from two trials assessing the efficacy of abatacept in MTX inadequate responders were pooled for this exploratory post hoc analysis. Patients with disease duration of ≤ 2 years at baseline (early disease), originally assigned to an abatacept approximately 10 mg/kg treatment arm and entered into a long-term extension (LTE), were compared with patients with ≥ 10 years of disease (long-standing RA). Remission, DAS28-CRP, ACR 70 responses and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), improvement in physical function as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of these patients (n=108) had early disease. A higher percentage of patients with early disease achieved DAS28-CRP remission versus patients with long-standing disease (35.2% vs. 19.4% at year 1, p<0.01; 46.0% vs. 30.9% at year 3, p<0.05). In addition, a higher percentage of the subgroup with early RA achieved ACR70 responses. More patients with early RA had a meaningful improvement in their HAQ-DI (75.2% vs. 60.4%; p<0.05) and RAPID3 scores at one year (mean changes from baseline of -9.6 vs. -8.1; p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide additional support for the possible use of abatacept in biologic-naive patients who have had inadequate response to MTX, earlier in their disease course.

Long-term safety of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Methotrexate (MTX) has been the anchor treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the last 15 years, and is used in combination with biologic agents to enhance efficacy over the last decade or so. The safety profile of MTX has been studied over 25 years with very few clinically important adverse events in the weekly low-doses used for RA treatment. The importance of MTX in earlier and more aggressive management of RA patients cannot be overstated. MTX courses show some of the longest continuation rates reported in clinical medicine, due to both effectiveness and safety. The safety profile of MTX indicates that it is among the safest of any mediation used for the treatment of any arthritis. Better information on the effectiveness and safety of weekly-low dose MTX should be communicated to all health professionals involved in the management of RA patients.

Differences in pain and fatigue perception among a group of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the United States and in Turkey who have similar disease activity and functional status.

OBJECTIVES: The concordance of patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) among different countries has not been studied in detail. We tried to determine the differences in pain and fatigue perception among a group of RA patients in the US and in Turkey who had similar disease activity and functional score in multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ FN). METHODS: One hundred and thirty seven RA patients from Turkey and 129 from the US were studied. An MDHAQ was obtained and a DAS28 was calculated for each patient. Pain and fatigue perception was compared between the two groups after adjusting for age, sex, MDHAQ FN and DAS 28. RESULTS: Turkish patients had less pain than their US counterparts when adjusted for MDHAQ FN, DAS 28, age and sex (3.56 (2.24) vs. 4.35 (2.23), p=0.005) whereas there was no difference in fatigue between the two groups (3.85 (2.44) vs. 4.25 (2.45), p=0.194). When the patients with a DAS28 score of above 5.1 and below 2.6 were compared in both groups, Turkish patients had again less pain albeit less in the high disease activity group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Turkish patients have less pain than the US patients when controlled for age, gender and MDHAQFN and DAS28 scores. This is at odds to the conventional wisdom that pain perception is increased among the non-Western cultures.

Disparities in rheumatoid arthritis disease activity according to gross domestic product in 25 countries in the QUEST-RA database.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse associations between the clinical status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the gross domestic product (GDP) of their resident country. METHODS: The Quantitative Standard Monitoring of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (QUEST-RA) cohort includes clinical and questionnaire data from 6004 patients who were seen in usual care at 70 rheumatology clinics in 25 countries as of April 2008, including 18 European countries. Demographic variables, clinical characteristics, RA disease activity measures, including the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28), and treatment-related variables were analysed according to GDP per capita, including 14 "high GDP" countries with GDP per capita greater than US$24,000 and 11 "low GDP" countries with GDP per capita less than US$11,000. RESULTS: Disease activity DAS28 ranged between 3.1 and 6.0 among the 25 countries and was significantly associated with GDP (r = -0.78, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.90, r(2) = 61%). Disease activity levels differed substantially between "high GDP" and "low GDP" countries at much greater levels than according to whether patients were currently taking or not taking methotrexate, prednisone and/or biological agents. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical status of patients with RA was correlated significantly with GDP among 25 mostly European countries according to all disease measures, associated only modestly with the current use of antirheumatic medications. The burden of arthritis appears substantially greater in "low GDP" than in "high GDP" countries. These findings may alert healthcare professionals and designers of health policy towards improving the clinical status of patients with RA in all countries.

The COX-2 inhibitor market withdrawals and prescribing patterns by rheumatologists in patients with gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVE: To examine effects of the COX-2 inhibitor market withdrawals on NSAID utilization among patients at increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) toxicities. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted using patients enrolled in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) Registry. The study population included rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients prescribed NSAIDs by rheumatologists from 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2005. Three cohorts were defined based on calendar year. The primary outcome assessed whether or not an NSAID gastroprotective strategy was prescribed. Secondary outcomes included rates of COX-2 inhibitor utilization and gastroprotective co-therapy utilization, stratified by the presence of cardiac and GI risk factors. RESULTS: NSAID gastroprotection utilization decreased from 65.1% in 2003 to 47.7% (p<0.001) in 2005. COX-2 inhibitor use decreased from 55.1% to 29.2% (p<0.001), whereas nonselective NSAIDs (nsNSAIDs) use increased from 50.2% to 73.9% (p=<0.01). Among patients with two or more risk factors for NSAID related GI bleeding, gastroprotection decreased from 74.4% in 2003 to 60.9% (p<0.01). For patients with two or more CV risk factors from 2003 to 2005, COX-2 inhibitor utilization decreased significantly, whereas nsNSAID utilization increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The COX-2 inhibitor withdrawals resulted in a rapid decline in NSAID gastroprotection prescribed by participating U.S. rheumatologists despite the availability of other gastroprotective options. Channeling toward nsNSAID use was widespread, including among patients at increased CV risk. Longer term follow-up is required to determine the clinical significance of these changes in NSAID prescribing, particularly for NSAID-related GI and CV-related toxicities.

Increased lipid levels but unchanged atherogenic index in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: published experience.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of increased mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and it is recommended to treat risk factors for CVD in RA patients aggressively, including increased lipid levels. However, the effect of biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) on the lipid profile of RA patients remains under-researched, and what data exist are often contradictory. OBJECTIVES: To review available data published to date on lipid profile changes in RA patients treated with biologic DMARDs. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database without time limits until January 31, 2008 for original clinical trials regarding the effect of biological DMARDs on the lipid profiles of RA patients, tabulating total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and atherogenic index (ratio of total cholesterol to HDL) data for RA patients treated with biologic DMARDs. Percent change values from baseline to end of study were calculated. RESULTS: Eighteen studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The total cholesterol levels of patients treated with biological DMARDs was reported to increase in eleven studies (mean change 14.8%). One study reported a decrease (change 4.07%), and six reported no significant change. In HDL levels, nine studies reported increases (mean change 13.1%), two reported decreases (mean change 8.69%) and six reported no significant changes. Five studies reported an increase in LDL levels (mean change 11.2%), no studies reported a decrease, and six studies reported no significant change. The atherogenic index was reported to increase in two studies (mean change 4.27%), decrease in two studies (mean change 7.26%), and not significantly change in nine studies. Only a third of the reviewed articles reported on the LDL/HDL ratio, but of those that did, two reported an increase (mean change 4.55%), one reported a decrease (change 8.03%), and three reported no significant changes. DISCUSSION: Our data suggest increases in lipid levels between baseline and end of study in clinical trials of RA patients treated with biologic DMARDs. However, the clinical implications of this finding with regard to cardiovascular outcomes are not clear in part due to the fact that in most of the studies the atherogenic index was not significantly changed from baseline to end of study. Those studies that do provide data on effects on cholesterol rarely provide information on the complete lipid profile.

Patient and physician perception of the infusion process of the biologic agents abatacept, infliximab, and rituximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the process related to each infusible biologic used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with regard to patient and physician engagement in the infusion process, ancillary services required, and participant preferences. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of patients with RA and their physicians. Biologic-naïve patients with RA starting abatacept, infliximab, or rituximab were included. Both patients and physicians completed detailed questionnaires related to the infusion and satisfaction with the process. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients were enrolled: abatacept (n=102), infliximab (n=74), rituximab (n=29). Patients were primarily female (75%), Caucasian (85%), with a mean age of 58 years. Patients had a mean disease duration of approximately 8 years and had typically failed multiple DMARDs. Rituximab required the most pre-infusion preparation and the longest infusion time. Abatacept was associated with a shorter mean infusion time (42 minutes) than infliximab (131 minutes; p<0.0001) or rituximab (274 minutes; p<0.0001) and required less time away from work/home (p=0.01 and p<0.0001, respectively). Abatacept patients reported significantly less discomfort than rituximab patients (p=0.03), while discomfort was similar between abatacept and infliximab. From the physicians' perspective, compared to infliximab and rituximab abatacept was very easy to administer (57% vs. 27% and 5%, respectively), caused no pain/discomfort (52% vs. 42% and 31%), and had very infrequent infusion reactions (75% vs. 30% and 44%). CONCLUSION: The process involved in infusion administration, as perceived by both the patient and physician, seems to differ across the three infusible biologic agents and may have an impact on the decision-making process regarding which infusible biologic to use.

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels are poorly correlated with clinical measures of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and osteoarthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the patterns and correlation of elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels with outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and compare it to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and osteoarthritis (OA) patients. METHODS: Brooklyn Outcomes Arthritis Registry Database (BOARD) was analyzed to determine both first visit and mean values of ESR and CRP, along with disease activity measures in each patient. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and correlations. RESULTS: Among all patients half of all (n=377) ESR results were elevated. In RA patients the proportions of having both ESR and CRP elevated, both within normal levels, and only one elevated and the other normal were similar. For all diagnosis, both ESR and CRP have weak positive correlations with disease activity measures measured at first visits. ESR and CRP have a modest positive correlation with each other across all three disease groups. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of RA, SLE and OA patients, ESR and CRP values were modestly correlated with each other and they were weakly correlated with disease activity measures. These data suggest that another look at the role of ESR and CRP as markers of inflammation in RA patients seen in routine care may be in order.

Behçet's syndrome patients have high levels of functional disability, fatigue and pain as measured by a Multi-dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ).

OBJECTIVE: Current tools for assessing Behçet's syndrome (BS) do not include patient-reported outcomes such as functional disability, pain or fatigue. We examined various outcome measures using the multi-dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and compared them between BS patients with and without arthritis. We also compared the results to those for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the disease in relation to which the MDHAQ has been most thoroughly studied. METHODS: We conducted a comparative review of BS and early RA patients being followed at the New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases (NYU HJD) and the Behçet's Syndrome Center. All patients completed an MDHAQ at each visit, which included functional disability, pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, and patient and physician global assessments of disease activity. A chart review for BS manifestations and treatments was also carried out. All patient evaluations reported here represent the baseline values at first visit. RESULTS: 129 patients with BS and 116 with early RA were surveyed. BS patients had similar pain levels and physician global assessment of disease activity to the RA patients and higher functional disability, fatigue and patient assessments of global disease activity. Among BS patients, those with arthritis had significantly higher scores for all the outcome measures examined except the physician global assessment of disease activity. CONCLUSION: Using the MDHAQ could reveal previously under-recognized problems in BS, as was observed in this survey of BS patients with arthritis. Such information might be helpful in the management of patients with BS.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, methotrexate or both? An inquiry into the formal evidence for when they are to be used in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The relative high cost and potential side effects mandate careful scrutiny as to when tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitors should be used in everyday practice. We surveyed how TNF inhibitors performed in randomized controlled trials when compared to methotrexate in methotrexate naive rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: We identified all randomized controlled trials with TNF inhibitors and methotrexate. We surveyed A-whether the patients enrolled were methotrexate naive or not; B-efficacy outcomes and C-radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: Four studies that had been reported to be conducted among metho-trexate naive patients were identified. TEMPO trial was not done entirely in methotrexate naive patients, contrary to what has been reported by its authors. Among these studies the methotrexate naive arms did as well as the TNF inhibitor alone. The combination was better than either drug alone. Among the 6 studies in which the methotrexate failure patients had been enrolled, the TNF inhibitors always performed better when analyzed head to head with the methotrexate alone arms. CONCLUSIONS: Available data indicate that TNF inhibitors are superior to solo methotrexate use only in the setting of combination treatment.

Most tumour necrosis factor inhibitor trials in rheumatology are undeservedly called 'efficacy and safety' trials: a survey of power considerations.

OBJECTIVES: Many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are labelled efficacy and safety while due consideration for power is provided only for efficacy outcomes. This in turn necessitates a discussion of the inadequacy of sample size (type II error) for identifying harm. This is particularly important in RCTs of TNF inhibitors as harm related to these agents is still a matter of debate. METHODS: PubMed was searched for all RCTs published examining TNF inhibitors in RA, PsA and AS. Only original study reports were surveyed for whether: (i) they were labelled as efficacy, safety or both; (ii) the methods sections included safety as a primary or secondary end point; (iii) power calculations were adequately explained; (iv) statistical tests of significance were given for harm; and finally (v) any discussion of type II error for harm was present. RESULTS: Of the 34 articles surveyed, 24 (71%) were labelled as efficacy and safety. Among these, 23 (96%) did not include safety as a formal primary or secondary end point. In only 2/24 (8%) power calculations were given for safety. Finally, in only 3/22 (14%) any discussion about the inadequate sample size (type II error) for detecting harm could be found. CONCLUSIONS: Most reports of RCTs of TNF inhibitors in rheumatological diseases are inappropriately labelled as addressing efficacy and safety. Their lack of power in detecting harm is not adequately discussed, either.

An index of only patient-reported outcome measures, routine assessment of patient index data 3 (RAPID3), in two abatacept clinical trials: similar results to disease activity score (DAS28) and other RAPID indices that include physician-reported measures.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the capacity of routine assessment of patient index data 3 (RAPID3), an index of only the three patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in the RA Core Data Set-physical function, pain and global status-to distinguish abatacept from control treatments in two clinical trials, and to compare RAPID3 results with the disease activity score 28 (DAS28) and RAPID-based indices that add a tender or swollen joint count and/or physician/assessor global estimate of status. METHODS: Clinical trial data from AIM (Abatacept in Inadequate response to Methotrexate) and ATTAIN [Abatacept Trial in Treatment of Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) INadequate responders] were reanalysed. Mean values were computed at baseline, endpoint and for change between baseline and endpoint for RAPID3, DAS28 and additional RAPID indices to study whether they had greater capacity to distinguish abatacept from control therapy. RAPID4TJC adds to RAPID3 a tender joint count; RAPID4SJC, a swollen joint count; RAPID4MD, a physician/assessor global estimate; and RAPID5 adds both a tender joint count and physician/assessor global estimate. RAPID2 includes only physician/assessor and patient global estimates. RESULTS: All indices indicated significant differences of 19-28% between abatacept and control groups. Results were similar for RAPID3 of only patient measures, compared to DAS28 and other RAPID-based indices. CONCLUSION: A RAPID3 'patient-only' index, without a joint count or any measure from a health professional or laboratory, distinguishes active from control treatments in two abatacept clinical trials, at levels similar to DAS28 and to other RAPID-based indices that add physician-reported measures.

Quantitative measurement of patient status in the regular care of patients with rheumatic diseases over 25 years as a continuous quality improvement activity, rather than traditional research.

Patient assessment in rheumatology is characterized by an important paradox: many extensively-characterized quantitative measures and indices have been developed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), ankylosing spondylitis, vasculitis, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and other rheumatic diseases. However, most regular rheumatology care is guided largely by qualitative clinical impressions, without such measures or indices or any quantitative data other than laboratory tests to assess patient status and/or quality of care. This paradox may be explained in part by regarding the development of measures primarily as clinical research activities, while viewing the application of measurements in regular clinical care as continuous quality improvement (CQI) activities. The development of measures has emphasized validity and reliability, but generally ignored feasibility and acceptability to patients and health professionals, both of which are needed for application in regular clinical care. A summary of the application of clinical measurement in patients with RA over 25 years between 1982 and 2007 at a weekly academic rheumatology clinic conducted by the senior author is presented as 20 often contemporaneous CQI cycles. These cycles include development of a user-friendly modified health assessment questionnaire (MHAQ); assessment of psychological status; monitoring of mortality outcomes; comparisons of joint counts, radiographic scores, and laboratory tests to the MHAQ; a 28-joint count; prospective study of the MHAQ to predict mortality when joint counts, radiographic scores, and laboratory tests are available; development of a multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ) with complex activities; a fatigue scale; a self-report joint count; scoring templates; a computerized data management system; flow sheets to monitor MDHAQ status; visual analog scales as 21 circles rather than 10 cm lines; composite RAPID3 (rheumatology assessment patient index data) scores for 3 patient measures; and defining RAPID categories for high, moderate and low severity, and near remission. The latter cycles remain under study as ongoing CQI activities.