RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We used dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and periapical radiography to assess bone density differences after conventional and bone-condensing dental implant techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Single-tooth dental implants were placed by both conventional and bone-condensing techniques in 14 patients with bilateral missing teeth. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry was used to calculate bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) before and 6 and 12 months after implant placement. Furthermore, photodensitometry of periapical radiographs was also assessed. RESULTS: The success rate was 92.9% for the conventional technique and 71.5% for the bone-condensing technique. The BMD was observed to be significantly higher 6 and 12 months after implant placement. The BMC and photodensitometry were significantly increased 6 months after implant placement but showed no further after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in BMD, BMC, and photodensitometry between the two implant placement techniques. However, success rate of the conventional technique was greater than the bone-condensing technique, which may be the result of trabecular fracture associated with the bone-condensing.
