Liposomal bupivacaine addition versus standard bupivacaine alone for colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Aim: This study evaluated use of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus standard bupivacaine (SB) alone in quadratus lumborum (QL) blocks for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Materials & methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients received QL1 blocks with either LB (40 ml 0.125% SB plus 20 ml of LB) or SB (60 ml of 0.25% SB) with 30 ml per side. Opioid usage, pain scores, side effects and other medications were recorded. Results: For 78 patients (38 LB; 40 SB), all parameters were similar between groups, except that the LB group had a higher 48 h need for metoclopramide. Conclusion: LB provided no analgesic benefit over SB alone for QL blocks. Clinical Trials registration number: NCT03702621.

Lay abstract This study evaluated use of extended release bupivacaine (LB) versus standard bupivacaine (SB) alone in nerve blocks for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Patients undergoing colorectal surgery received nerve blocks with either LB combined with SB, or SB alone. Opioid usage, pain scores, side effects and other medications were recorded. For 78 patients (38 LB + SB; 40 SB), all parameters were similar between groups, except that the LB group had a higher 48 h need for anti-nausea medication. LB provided no pain control benefit over SB alone for nerve blocks in colorectal surgery.

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Continuous catheter infusion provides no additional analgesic benefit over single-injection ropivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are useful for adjunctive pain control following laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN). The objective was to determine if TAP catheter provides additional analgesia compared with single-injection TAP block alone for kidney donors. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, LLDN patients received a single TAP injection of 30 mL 0.2% ropivacaine and had a catheter inserted into the TAP space. Postoperatively, either 0.2% ropivacaine (TAP catheter group; TAP-C) or saline (TAP saline group; TAP-S) was infused at 10 mL/h. Pain scores, narcotic usage, nausea, and sedation were evaluated at 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours. RESULTS: The study population included 70 patients (35 randomly assigned to each group). No differences in pain scores, narcotic usage, nausea, or sedation were observed at any time point (with the exception of lower median pain score for TAP-S at 60 hours; 3.2 vs 3.9 for TAP-C; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The lower pain score for placebo group at 60-hour postoperative is likely clinically insignificant. The TAP catheter infusion provided no benefit over a single-injection TAP block; thus, the added risk and cost are not supported. Liposomal bupivacaine should be evaluated in future studies.

Comparison of methods of providing analgesia after pancreas transplant: IV opioid analgesia versus transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or continuous catheter infusion.

BACKGROUND: Current practices emphasize a multimodal approach to perioperative analgesia due to higher efficacy and decreased opioid usage. Analgesia for pancreas transplant (PT) has traditionally been managed with intravenous (IV) opioids, and reports of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are limited in this population. METHODS: Three interventions were compared in adult PT patients, including IV opioids, TAP catheter, and TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine. Time to return of intestinal function and oral diet, postoperative pain scores, opioid usage, and length of stay were recorded. RESULTS: Study included 197 PT patients: 62 (32%) standard care, 90 (45%) TAP catheters with continuous 0.2% ropivacaine, and 45 (23%) single liposomal bupivacaine TAP block. Pain scores were lowest for the IV opioid group (P < 0.001). The liposomal bupivacaine group had lower pain scores on postoperative days (POD) 1-5 than the TAP catheter group. Opioid use during POD 1-5 was lower for both TAP block groups (P = 0.03). Time to bowel function was faster for the TAP block groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IV opioid analgesia, TAP block interventions were associated with lower overall use of opioids and a faster time to intestinal function following pancreas transplant.