The feasibility study of using multiple partial volumetric-modulated arcs therapy in early stage left-sided breast cancer patients.

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a multiple partial volumetric-modulated arcs therapy (MP-VMAT) technique on the left breast irradiation and to evaluate the dosimetry and treatment efficiency. Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer who had been treated by whole breast irradiation were selected for the treatment plan evaluation by using six partial volumetric modulated arcs. Each arc consisted of a 50° gantry rotation. The planning target volumes and the normal organs, including the right breast, the bilateral lungs, left ventricle, heart, and unspecified tissue, were contoured on the CT images. Dose-volume histograms were generated and the delivery time for each arc was recorded. The PTV received greater than 95% of the V(95) for all cases, and the maximum dose was within ± 1% of 110% of the prescription dose. The mean homogeneity index (HI) was 10.61 ± 0.99, and mean conformity index (CI) was 1.21 ± 0.03. The mean dose, V(5), V(10), V(25), and V(30) of the heart were 7.61 ± 1.38 Gy, 59.73% ± 15.87%, 24.39%± 6.82%, 2.52%± 1.11%, and 1.57% ± 0.71%, respectively. The volume of the left ventricle receiving 25 Gy was 5.15% ± 2.23%. The total lung mean dose was 5.57 ± 0.36 Gy, with V(5) of 25.39% ± 3.88% and V(20) of 5.66% ± 0.89%. The right breast received a mean dose of 2.13 ± 0.22 Gy, with V(5) of 1.83% ± 1.22% and V(10) of 0.04% ± 0.12%. The mean dose of unspecified tissue was 5.34 ± 0.37 Gy and V(5) was 22.23% ± 1.57%. The volume of the unspecified tissue receiving 50 Gy was 0.50% ± 0.14%. The mean delivery time for each arc was 13.9 seconds. The average MU among ten patients was 511 MU (range 443 to 594 MUs). The MP-VMAT technique for the left-sided breast cancer patients achieved adequate target dose coverage while maintaining low doses to organs-at-risk, and therefore reduced the potential for induction of second malignancy and side effects. The highly efficient treatment delivery would be beneficial for improving patient throughput, providing patient comfort, and achieving precise treatment with the breathing control system.

Measurement-based Monte Carlo dose calculation system for IMRT pretreatment and on-line transit dose verifications.

The aim of this study was to develop a dose simulation system based on portal dosimetry measurements and the BEAM Monte Carlo code for intensity-modulated (IM) radiotherapy dose verification. This measurement-based Monte Carlo (MBMC) system can perform, within one systematic calculation, both pretreatment and on-line transit dose verifications. BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc 2006 were used to simulate radiation transport from the treatment head, through the patient, to the plane of the aS500 electronic portal imaging device (EPID). In order to represent the nonuniform fluence distribution of an IM field within the MBMC simulation, an EPID-measured efficiency map was used to redistribute particle weightings of the simulated phase space distribution of an open field at a plane above a patient/phantom. This efficiency map was obtained by dividing the measured energy fluence distribution of an IM field to that of an open field at the EPID plane. The simulated dose distribution at the midplane of a homogeneous polystyrene phantom was compared to the corresponding distribution obtained from the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) for pretreatment verification. It also generated a simulated transit dose distribution to serve as the on-line verification reference for comparison to that measured by the EPID. Two head-and-neck (NPC1 and NPC2) and one prostate cancer fields were tested in this study. To validate the accuracy of the MBMC system, film dosimetry was performed and served as the dosimetry reference. Excellent agreement between the film dosimetry and the MBMC simulation was obtained for pretreatment verification. For all three cases tested, gamma evaluation with 3%/3 mm criteria showed a high pass percentage (> 99.7%) within the area in which the dose was greater than 30% of the maximum dose. In contrast to the TPS, the MBMC system was able to preserve multileaf collimator delivery effects such as the tongue-and-groove effect and interleaf leakage. In the NPC1 field, the TPS showed 16.5% overdose due to the tongue-and-groove effect and 14.6% overdose due to improper leaf stepping. Similarly, in the NPC2 field, the TPS showed 14.1% overdose due to the tongue-and-groove effect and 8.9% overdose due to improper leaf stepping. In the prostate cancer field, the TPS showed 6.8% overdose due to improper leaf stepping. No tongue-and-groove effect was observed for this field. For transit dose verification, agreements among the EPID measurement, the film dosimetry, and the MBMC system were also excellent with a minimum gamma pass percentage of 99.6%.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy for T1 to T3 prostate cancer: an experience in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: To report outcomes for localized prostate cancer patients treated with the combination of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS: Eighty-five Stage T1c to T3b prostate cancer patients treated with HDR brachytherapy plus EBRT were included. An HDR dose of 16.5 Gy in 3 fractions over 24 hours was given 2 weeks before EBRT. An EBRT dose of 50.4 Gy was administered to the prostate and seminal vesicles. Younger patients (aged less than 75 years) with greater than 15% risk of nodal metastasis received whole-pelvis RT (45 Gy in 25 fractions) as part of EBRT. RESULTS: Fifty percent of patients belonged to the high-risk (T3a or Gleason score 8-10 or prostate-specific antigen greater than 20 ng/mL) or very-high-risk (T3b) groups. After a median follow-up of 49 months (range, 24 to 70 months), 4-year biochemical control survival (less than nadir + 2) was 86% (100%, 91%, and 81% for patients in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, respectively. Three of four T3b patients experienced early biochemical failure. Four patients (5%) had grade 3 implant-related urinary retention. Chronic gastrointestinal toxicities were limited, but four grade 3 chronic genitourinary toxicities (5%) were noted in relation to urethral stricture and severe hematuria. Whole-pelvis EBRT was a major contributing factor to acute but not to chronic gastrointestinal toxicities. Among 60 patients with pretreatment sexual potency, 17 (26%) retained capability after 4 years. Six patients (10%) lost potency merely as a result of salvage hormone therapy. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose-rate brachytherapy plus EBRT can achieve satisfactory biochemical control with acceptable complications for T1c to T3a prostate cancer patients.