Systemic administration of donepezil attenuates the efficacy of environmental enrichment on neurobehavioral outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) donepezil (DON) is recommended as a potential treatment for cognition after clinical traumatic brain injury (TBI) and therefore may be prescribed as an adjunct therapy during rehabilitation. However, a dose-response study evaluating DON after a controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury in rats did not reveal cognitive benefits. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of DON on behavioral and histological outcome when combined with environmental enrichment (EE), a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation. It was hypothesized that the combined treatments would produce a synergistic effect yielding improved recovery over neurorehabilitation alone. METHODS: Isoflurane-anesthetized adult male rats received a CCI or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing plus systemic injections of DON (0.25 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH; 1.0 mL/kg saline) once daily for 19 days beginning 24 hr after injury. Function was assessed by established motor and cognitive tests on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 19. RESULTS: DON was ineffective when administered alone. In contrast, EE conferred significant motor and cognitive benefits, and reduced cortical lesion volume vs. STD (p < 0.05). Combining the therapies weakened the efficacy of rehabilitation as revealed by diminished motor and cognitive recovery in the TBI+EE+DON group vs. the TBI+EE+VEH group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data replicate previous findings showing that EE is beneficial and DON is ineffective after CCI and add to the literature a novel and unpredicted finding that supports neither the hypothesis nor the use of DON for TBI. Investigation of other AChEIs after CCI injury is necessary to gain further insight into the value of this therapeutic strategy.

Environmental enrichment promotes robust functional and histological benefits in female rats after controlled cortical impact injury.

Environmental enrichment (EE) consistently induces marked benefits in male rats after traumatic brain injury (TBI), but whether similar efficacy extends to females is not well established. Hence, the aim of this study was to reassess the effect of EE on functional and histological outcome in female rats after brain trauma. Twenty-four normal cycling adult female rats underwent verification of estrous stage prior to controlled cortical impact (CCI) or sham injury and then were assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing. Motor function was assessed with beam-balance/beam-walk and rotarod tasks on post-operative days 1-5 and every other day from 1-19, respectively. Spatial learning/memory was evaluated in a Morris water maze on days 14-19. Morphologically intact hippocampal CA(1/3) cells and cortical lesion volume were quantified 3 weeks after injury. No differences were observed between the EE and STD sham groups in any endpoint measure and thus the data were pooled. In the TBI groups, EE improved beam-balance, beam-walk, rotarod, and spatial learning performance vs. STD (p's<0.05). EE also provided significant histological protection as confirmed by increased CA(1/3) cell survival and decreased cortical lesion size vs. STD. These data demonstrate that EE confers robust benefits in female rats after CCI injury, which parallels numerous studies in males and lends further credence for EE as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation.

Elucidating the role of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(7) receptors on 8-OH-DPAT-induced behavioral recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury.

8-OH-DPAT is a 5-HT(1A/7) receptor agonist that enhances behavioral recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study is a first attempt to decipher whether the benefits induced by 8-OH-DPAT after TBI are mediated by 5-HT(1A) or 5-HT(7) receptors. A single i.p. injection of 8-OH-DPAT (0.5 mg/kg) alone or co-administered with either the 5-HT(1A) or 5-HT(7) receptor antagonists WAY 100635 (0.5 mg/kg) or SB 269970 HCl (2.0 mg/kg), respectively, or vehicle control (1.0 mL/kg) was given 15 min after cortical impact or sham injury. Function was assessed by established motor and cognitive tests. No difference in motor performance was observed among the TBI groups. Spatial acquisition was enhanced, relative to vehicle controls, by 8-OH-DPAT alone and when co-administered with WAY 100635, but not when combined with SB 269970 HCl. These data imply that 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonism does not abate the 8-OH-DPAT-induced cognitive benefits, but 5-HT(7) receptor antagonism does, which suggests that the 8-OH-DPAT-induced benefits in this single administration paradigm may be mediated more by 5-HT(7) versus 5-HT(1A) receptors. Evaluation of a specific 5-HT(7) receptor agonist will further elucidate the contribution of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(7) receptors on behavioral recovery conferred by acute 8-OH-DPAT treatment after TBI.