Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT).

BACKGROUND: Gait disorders and cognitive impairments are prime causes of disability and institutionalization after stroke. We hypothesized that relative to single-task gait rehabilitation (ST GR), cognitive-motor dual-task (DT) GR initiated at the subacute stage would be associated with greater improvements in ST and DT gait, balance, and cognitive performance, personal autonomy, disability, and quality of life in the short, medium and long terms after stroke. METHODS: This multicenter (n=12), two-arm, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), controlled clinical study is a superiority trial. With p<0.05, a power of 80%, and an expected loss to follow-up rate of 10%, the inclusion of 300 patients will be required to evidence a 0.1-m.s-1 gain in gait speed. Trial will include adult patients (18-90 years) in the subacute phase (0 to 6 months after a hemispheric stroke) and who are able to walk for 10 m (with or without a technical aid). Registered physiotherapists will deliver a standardized GR program (30 min three times a week, for 4 weeks). The GR program will comprise various DTs (phasic, executive function, praxis, memory, and spatial cognition tasks during gait) in the DT (experimental) group and gait exercises only in the ST (control) group. The primary outcome measure is gait speed 6 months after inclusion. The secondary outcomes are post-stroke impairments (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and the motor part of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the lower extremity), gait speed (10-m walking test), mobility and dynamic balance (timed up-and-go test), ST and DT cognitive function (the French adaptation of the harmonization standards neuropsychological battery, and eight cognitive-motor DTs), personal autonomy (functional independence measure), restrictions in participation (structured interview and the modified Rankin score), and health-related quality of life (on a visual analog scale). These variables will be assessed immediately after the end of the protocol (probing the short-term effect), 1 month thereafter (the medium-term effect), and 5 months thereafter (the long-term effect). DISCUSSION: The main study limitation is the open design. The trial will focus on a new GR program applicable at various stages after stroke and during neurological disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03009773 . Registered on January 4, 2017.

Determinants of disability at 6 months after stroke: The GRECogVASC Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the contributions of background disorders responsible for participation restriction as indexed by a structured interview for the modified Rankin Scale (mRS-SI). METHODS: A subset of 256 patients was assessed at 6 months after stroke using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), gait score, comprehensive cognitive battery (yielding a global cognitive Z-score), behavioral dysexecutive disorders (DDs), anxiety and depressive symptoms, epilepsy, and headache. Following bivariate analyses, determinants of participation restriction were selected using ordinal regression analysis with partial odds. RESULTS: Poststroke participation restriction (mRS-SI score > 1) was observed in 59% of the patients. In bivariate analyses, mRS-SI score was associated with prestroke mRS-SI score, 6-month NIHSS score, gait score, global cognitive Z-score, behavioral DDs, and presence of anxiety and depression (all: p = 0.0001; epilepsy: p =0.3; headache: p = 0.7). After logistic regression analysis, NIHSS score was associated with increasing mRS-SI score (p = 0.00001). Prestroke mRS-SI score (p = 0.00001), behavioral DDs (p = 0.0008) and global cognitive Z-score (p = 0.01) were associated with both mRS-SI score > 1 and mRS-SI score > 2. In addition, gait score was associated with mRS-SI score > 2 (p = 0.00001). This model classified 85% of mRS-SI scores correctly (p = 0.001). Structural equation modeling showed the contributions of gait limitation (standardized coefficient [SC]: 0.68; p = 0.01), prestroke mRS-SI (SC: 0.41; p = 0.01), severity of neurological impairment (SC: 0.16; p = 0.01), global cognitive Z-score (SC: -0.14; p = 0.05), and behavioral DDs (SC: 0.13; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: These results provide a statistical model of weights of determinants responsible for poststroke participation restriction and highlight a new independent determinant: behavioral DDs.

Rod and frame test and posture under optokinetic stimulation used to explore two complementary aspects of the visual influence in postural control after stroke.

BACKGROUND: Balance rehabilitation should consider individual comportments according to visual input (VI). Indeed, visual dependence (VD), defined as the predominance given to the VI whatever the circumstances, frequent after stroke it could disturb balance. Because the term VD is a bit restrictive and cannot be deduced from clinical tests, the term visual sensitivity (VS) is preferred here. HYPOTHESIS: VI could have different influence depending on the task for a given individual. METHODS: We retrospectively compared 2 VS tests routinely used: the rod and frame test (RFT) and optokinetic stimulation (OKS). In RFT, VS was defined by a misperception of the visual verticality induced by a tilted frame (VS RFT) and in OKS by tilted sitting posture induced by rotational OKS (VS OKS). We studied the relations between VS RFT and VS OKS. RESULTS: We analysed data for 84 patients, mean age 55±10years, 45±30days after stroke. Scores for both tests were correlated with autonomy measured by the functional independence measure (r=-0.3, p=0.01 and r=-0.2, p=0.02). VS OKS score was also correlated with balance measured by the postural assessment scale for stroke (r=-0.3, p=0.03). VS RFT score was not correlated with VS OKS score (p=0.4, r=0.04). DISCUSSION - CONCLUSION: A patient may display VS for one test without sensitivity for the other because these tests investigate different neural organisation - perception for RFT or action for OKS. Their relation to balance disorders should be further investigated to build individualized rehabilitation programs.