Enhanced recovery after surgery day surgery for MAKO® robotic-arm assisted TKA; better outcome for patients, improved efficiency for hospitals.

Introduction: Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was designed to improve implant position accuracy by providing surgeons with real-time intra-operative data to tailor the operation to the patient. Proponents of robotic-assisted TKA believe that this translates into meaningful improvements in outcomes. However, there are concerns that the longer surgical duration associated with robotic-assisted TKA leads to longer length of stay (LOS). In this study, the authors investigated the outcome of MAKO® Robotic-arm Assisted TKA combined with ERAS protocol to assess its effect on LOS and short-term outcomes. Methods: All patients who had undergone unilateral MAKO® ERAS Day Surgery TKA from August 2020 to July 2021 were prospectively followed up and matched to patients who underwent conventional ERAS Day Surgery TKA in the same time period. Factors such as surgical duration, LOS, immediate reduction in pain, 30-days complications, and 6-month PROMs and knee ROM were compared between the two groups. Results: 42 patients underwent MAKO® ERAS Day surgery TKA and were matched to 42 patients who underwent conventional ERAS Day surgery TKA. The study found that despite the longer surgical duration, LOS was comparable between both groups (1.1 ± 0.9days in the MAKO® group vs 1.0 ± 0.3days in the conventional group, p = 0.755) with successful 24-hour discharge in 88.1 % of patients in the MAKO® group. The MAKO® group achieved significantly better ROM compared to the conventional group 6-months post operatively. Post-operative PROMs were comparable between both groups. Conclusion: ERAS Day Surgery protocol can significantly reduce the LOS of patient undergoing MAKO® Robotic-arm Assisted TKA, conferring cost savings and making it a valid option for patients.

Effect of Context Specificity on Response to the Shortened WOMAC Function Scale in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To determine, in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether increasing context specificity of selected items of the shortened version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function (WOMAC-F) scale (ShortMAC-F) (1) enhanced the convergent validity of the ShortMAC-F with performance-based mobility measures (ii) affected mean scale score, structural validity, reliability, and interpretability. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of randomized clinical trial data. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing TKA (N=114). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The ShortMAC-F was modified by specifying the "ascending stairs" and "rising from sitting" items to enquire about difficulty in performing the tasks without reliance on compensatory strategies, whereas the modified "level walking" item enquired about difficulty in walking 400 m. Before and 12 weeks after TKA, patients completed the WOMAC-F questionnaire, modified ShortMAC-F questionnaire, knee pain scale questionnaire, sit-to-stand test, fast gait speed test, and stair climb test. Interpretability was evaluated by calculating anchor-based substantial clinical benefit estimates. RESULTS: The modified ShortMAC-F correlated significantly more strongly than ShortMAC-F or WOMAC-F with pooled performance measures (differences in correlation values, 0.12-0.14). Increasing item context specificity of the ShortMAC-F did not influence its psychometric properties of unidimensionality (comparative fit and Tucker-Lewis indices, >0.95; root mean square error of approximation, 0.05-0.08), reliability (Cronbach's α, 0.75-0.83), correlation with pain intensity (correlation values, 0.48-0.52), and substantial clinical benefit estimates (16 percentage points); however, it resulted in lower mean score (4.5-4.8 points lower). CONCLUSIONS: The modified ShortMAC-F showed sufficient measurement properties for clinical application, and it seemed more adept than WOMAC-F at correlating with performance-based measures in TKA.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in obese patients, poorer survivorship at 15 years.

Introduction: The preclusion of obese patients from unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increasingly been challenged. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on UKA at 15-year follow-up. Materials and methods: 169 unilateral UKA patients from 2003 to 2007 were followed-up prospectively for at least 15 years. 70 patients were left for analysis after accounting for patient demise, revision surgery and loss to follow-up. 48 of these patients (69%) were in the Control group (BMI <30 kg/m2) and 22 (31%) were in the Obese group (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Patients were assessed before and after operation using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) component of the Short Form 12. Survivorship analysis was also performed. Results: Obese patients went through UKA at an earlier age than the non-obese patients (54.7 ± 4.7 years compared to 59.9 ± 7.8 years, p = 0.005). At 2, 10, and 15-year follow-up, both groups achieved clinically significant improvements in outcomes. There was no significant association found between obesity and outcome using multiple linear regression. While propensity matching found PCS improvement at 2 years to be greater in obese patients, no significant association between obesity and 15-year outcome was found. All 13 patients who required revision, underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The overall 15-year survivorship was 74.2% within the obese group and 92.4% within the control group. Conclusion: Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had poorer 15-year survivorship with greater odds of requiring revision surgery. However, assuming implant survival, obese patients can expect a non-inferior outcome relative to their non-obese counterparts in all patient reported outcome measures 15 years after surgery.

Postponement of total knee arthroplasties due to pandemic causes significant deterioration on patients' preoperative knee and quality of life scores.

Introduction: Elective surgeries were postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic to alleviate healthcare strains, affecting majority of elective orthopaedic surgeries such as total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact on knee function and quality of life of patients who had their planned TKA postponed due to the pandemic. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data collected in a tertiary hospital. Patients included were diagnosed with primary knee osteoarthritis and they were initially scheduled for primary TKA between January to April 2020 but surgery was postponed by at least 6 months from the initial operative date. 160 patients were included in this study (53 males and 107 females, mean age 68.0 ± 8.1). Patients were assessed prior to initial surgery date and assessed again, prior to the postponed surgery date. Clinical scores included Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee scores (OKS) and Short-Form 36 Physical and Mental Component Scores. (SF36 PCS and MCS). Paired T-test was performed for parametric data whereas Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis was performed for non-parametric data. Results: Comparing initial preoperative versus postponement preoperative scores, the cohort had significantly poorer KSKS (38.4 ± 15.4 and 36.5 ± 15.4, p = 0.034), SF36 PCS (34.3 ± 9.2 and 32.7 ± 8.6, p = 0.02) and OKS (34.9 ± 0.77 and 35.8 ± 8.6, p = 0.02) scores respectively. Conclusion: The postponement of elective TKAs has resulted in a significant deterioration of knee scores and physical quality of live scores of patients in a short span of 6 months. Further studies can evaluate if there are repercussions on long term TKAs outcomes. Level of evidence: Retrospective study, Level III.

Severe genu varus deformity does not affect enhanced recovery after surgery total knee arthroplasty outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been increasingly adopted in orthopaedic surgery. Although not an exclusion criterion, patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with preoperative severe varus deformity may be less likely to be enrolled for ERAS. This study aimed to compare the success of ERAS TKA between patients with severe preoperative varus deformities (≥ 15° varus) and the control group (< 15° varus to 14° valgus). Our secondary aim was to compare postoperative complications and functional outcomes between the two groups. MATERIALS & METHODS: 310 TKAs performed from August 2019 to February 2021 were analyzed with a follow-up of 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome, ERAS TKA success, was defined as length of hospital stay of < 24 h. Other parameters included 30-day postoperative complications and clinical outcomes such as the original Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Knee Society Knee (KSKS) and Function Score (KSFS), Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-P), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS). RESULTS: There were 119 patients in the severe deformity group and 191 patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in ERAS success between the severe deformity group and control group, with both groups achieving similarly high rates (> 90%) of ERAS success. There were also no differences in 30-day postoperative complications and 6-month postoperative clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe preoperative varus deformity undergoing ERAS TKA achieved high ERAS success rates (> 90%). Genu varum is not a contraindication for ERAS TKA.

Cost and outcomes of Hospital-based Usual cAre versus Tele-monitor self-directed Rehabilitation (HUATR) in patients with total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of telemonitored self-directed rehabilitation (TR) compared with hospital-based rehabilitation (HBR) for patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DESIGN: In this randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial, 114 patients with primary TKA who were able to walk independently preoperatively were randomized to receive HBR (n = 58) or TR (n = 56). HBR comprised at least five physical therapy sessions over 10 weeks. TR comprised a therapist-led onboarding session, followed by a 10-week unsupervised home-based exercise program, with asynchronous monitoring of rehabilitation outcomes using a telemonitoring system. The primary outcome was fast-paced gait speed at 12 weeks, with a non-inferiority margin of 0.10 m/s. For economic analysis, quality-adjusted-life-years (QALY) was the primary economic outcome (non-inferiority margin, 0.027 points). RESULTS: In Bayesian analyses, TR had >95% posterior probability of being non-inferior to HBR in gait speed (week-12 adjusted TR-HBR difference, 0.02 m/s; 95%CrI, -0.05 to 0.10 m/s; week-24 difference, 0.01 m/s; 95%CrI, -0.07 to 0.10 m/s) and QALY (0.006 points; 95%CrI, -0.006 to 0.018 points). When evaluated from a societal perspective, TR was associated with lower mean intervention cost (adjusted TR-HBR difference, -S$227; 95%CrI, -112 to -330) after 24 weeks, with 82% probability of being cost-effective compared with HBR at a willingness to pay of S$0/unit of effect for the QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with uncomplicated TKAs and relatively good preoperative physical function, home-based, self-directed TR was non-inferior to and more cost-effective than HBR over a 24-week follow-up period. TR should be considered for this patient subgroup.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces need for patient selection for day surgery total knee arthroplasty.

Introduction: This study explored the safety and efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) together with a Day-surgery protocol on some commonly used selection criteria for expedited discharge after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: ERAS Day surgery TKA performed between Aug 2020 to July 2021 were included in this study. Discharge within 24 h was considered passing protocol. Complications such as infection, re-admission, and re-operation within 30-days were recorded. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and outcome measures at 6-month post-operatively were analysed between those who were successfully discharged within 24 h and those with prolong admission. Results: A total of 342 patients were included in the study. 315 patients (92.1 %) were discharged within 24 h s. Inadequately controlled pain was the most common reason for delayed discharge (17.9 %). No statistically significant difference in gender, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Body Mass Index (BMI), and American Society of Anaesthesiologist Classification (ASA) were noted between patients who failed protocol and those who passed. Readmission rate within 30days was 2.6 %. Infection occurred in 5 cases, including 2 prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requiring debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), 2 surgical site infection treated with antibiotics, and 1 pneumonia. No 30-days complication occurred in patients who initially failed ERAS Day-surgery protocol. Binary logistic regression was statistically insignificant on effect of gender, age, CCI, BMI, and ASA on passing protocol or 30-days complications. Propensity score matching of patients with prolong stay of more than 24 h did not demonstrate any difference in 6-month outcome. Conclusion: Patient characteristics such as gender, age, CCI, BMI, and ASA did not influence successful completion of ERAS Day-surgery protocol. Even if patients were initially enrolled in ERAS Day-surgery protocol but failed to be discharged within 24 h, this did not predispose them to increased 30-days complication or poorer 6-month outcome. Level of evidence: III.

Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and 36-Item Short Form Survey Ten Years Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) refers to a cutoff value on any patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) scale, beyond which patients consider themselves as having achieved an acceptable outcome. This study aimed to identify PASS thresholds for knee-specific and generic PROMs at 10 years post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: There were 269 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis from 2004 to 2007 at a single institution and were surveyed preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Score (MCS), and SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS). Treatment outcomes and expectations were assessed using an anchor question, and PASS attainment was determined using the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Also, a similar study that identified 2-year long-term PROM PASS thresholds for UKA was referenced and compared. RESULTS: Overall, 91.1% reported acceptable outcomes. The area under the curve for ROCs of KSKS, OKS, and PCS were 0.80, 0.75, and 0.71, respectively. The area under the curve for ROCs of KSFS and MCS were both 0.64. The PASS thresholds were 67.5 for KSFS, 70.5 for KSKS, 39.5 for OKS, 44.6 for PCS, and 43.8 for MCS. Patients who achieved a PASS were at least 3 times more likely to have satisfactory outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study that identified 10-year long-term PROM PASS thresholds for UKA. Accounting for our finding that a decade-long follow-up yielded lower PASS thresholds, time-specific UKA PROM PASS thresholds should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Enhanced recovery after day surgery total knee arthroplasty, the new standard of care: An Asian perspective.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with day-surgery protocol to assess the outcome of ERAS day surgery TKA compared with traditional ERAS inpatient TKA in terms of length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from August 2020 to July 2021 were followed up. All TKAs were performed with the ERAS protocol. Patients who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria were offered day-surgery protocol: (1) ASA ≤ 3; (2) agreeable for discharge home. In addition, this day-surgery protocol comprised the following: (i) on-call physiotherapy review; (ii) home visit by physiotherapist at 1 week postoperative; (iii) home visit by nurse at 2 weeks postoperative. Day surgery was defined as discharge within 24 h. Patients were followed up for 6 months and PROMs, postoperative complications, and re-admissions recorded. RESULTS: A total of 738 patients were included (342 ERAS day surgery, 396 ERAS inpatient). 92.4% of patients in the day-surgery group were successfully discharged within 24 h, leading to a shorter mean LOS of 1.13 days compared with 4.12 days in the inpatient group (P < 0.005). Both groups achieved significant and comparable improvement in Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Physical and Mental component of Short Form-36. Both groups had similar rate of 30-day readmission and complications. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent ERAS day surgery TKA achieved similar functional and quality of life improvement compared with ERAS inpatient TKA with no increased complication rate. ERAS day surgery TKA is safe and cost effective, and its use should be promoted.

Novel morphogenic knee implant delivers comparable mid-term outcomes as compared to conventional non-morphogenic implants.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA) implants have well-established mid- and long-term outcomes. The novel TKA (N-TKA) implants provide morphogenic implant components with smaller size increments to facilitate anatomical replication. The aim of the study is to evaluate if these advantages provides better clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Registry data prospectively collected within a single institution from 2014 to 2018 was reviewed and propensity score matching was performed to match C-TKA to N-TKA. 70 pairs of cruciate retaining (CR) TKA and 116 pairs of posterior stabilized (PS) TKA were identified. Range of motion, SF-36, Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were assessed preoperatively, 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Satisfaction was assessed 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Independent T test was performed for parametric data, whereas Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis was performed for non-parametric data. RESULTS: Both C-TKA and N-TKA cohorts demonstrated statistically significant improvement for KSKS, KSFS, OKS and SF-36 at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. C-TKA CR patients had better flexion at 6 months as compared to N-TKA CR (108.7° versus 98.3°, respectively, p = 0.046). At 24 months, there was no difference between C-TKA and N-TKA for range of motion, KSKS, KSFS, OKS and SF-36 PCS, regardless of insert type (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both models showed great postoperative improvements in KSFS, KSKS, OKS and SF-36 and have comparable early and mid-term outcomes, suggesting that N-TKAs are suitable substitutes for C-TKA. Longer follow-up studies are required to evaluate the long-term outcomes of N-TKAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: lll.

Discordance Between Self-Reported and Performance-Based Physical Function in Patients Who Have Knee Osteoarthritis: Associations With Pain Intensity and Negative Affect.

BACKGROUND: Although self-reported measures of physical disability are strong indication criterion for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in painful knee osteoarthritis (OA), some patients may report greater-than-observed disability. Contributing factors to this discordance are relatively unexplored. We aimed to examine whether pain and negative affect, including anxiety and depression, were associated with the discordance of self-reported measures with performance-based measures (PPM) of physical function. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data (n = 212) from two randomized rehabilitation trials in knee OA. All patients were assessed for knee pain intensity and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Self-reported function was assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) physical-function subscale. Objective performance-based measures (PPMs) of physical function were assessed by timed gait and stair tests. Continuous discordance scores were quantified by the difference in percentiles between WOMAC and PPMs (WOMAC-PPM), where a positive discordance, WOMAC-PPM >0, implied greater perceived than observed disability. RESULTS: Around 1 in 4 patients had >20 percentile units in WOMAC-PPM discordance. In Bayesian regression analyses, knee pain intensity had >99% posterior probability of positive associations with WOMAC-PPM discordance. Among patients awaiting TKA, anxiety intensity had approximately 99% probability of positive associations with discordance, and these associations had >65% probability of exceeding 10 percentile units. In contrast, depression had low (79% to 88%) probability of any association with discordance. CONCLUSION: In patients who have knee OA, a sizable proportion reported substantially greater physical disability than actually observed. Pain and anxiety intensity, but not depression, were meaningful predictors of this discordance. If validated, our findings may help in refining patient selection criteria for TKA.

Clinical Frailty Scale is a better predictor for adverse post-operative complications and functional outcomes than Modified Frailty Index and Charlson Comorbidity Index after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Studies have demonstrated correlations between frailty and comorbidity scores with adverse outcomes in total knee replacement (TKR). However, there is a lack of consensus on the most suitable pre-operative assessment tool. This study aims to compare Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Modified Frailty Index (MFI), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in predicting adverse post-operative complications and functional outcomes following a unilateral TKR. METHODS: In total, 811 unilateral TKR patients from a tertiary hospital were identified. Pre-operative variables were age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, CFS, MFI, and CCI. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain odd ratios of pre-operative variables on adverse post-operative complications (length of stay < LOS >, complications, ICU/HD admission, discharge location, 30-day readmission, 2-year reoperation). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to estimate the standardized effects of pre-operative variables on the Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: CFS is a strong predictor for LOS (OR 1.876, p < 0.001), complications (OR 1.83-4.97, p < 0.05), discharge location (OR 1.84, p < 0.001), and 2-year reoperation rate (OR 1.98, p < .001). ASA and MFI were predictors for ICU/HD admission (OR:4.04, p = 0.002; OR 1.58, p = 0.022, respectively). None of the scores was predictive for 30-day readmission. A higher CFS was associated with a worse outcome for 6-month KSS, 2-year KSS, 6-month OKS, 2-year OKS, and 6-month SF-36. CONCLUSION: CFS is a superior predictor for post-operative complications and functional outcomes than MFI and CCI in unilateral TKR patients. This suggests the importance of assessing pre-operative functional status when planning for TKR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, II.

Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Decision Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) may improve clinical outcomes for patients who have end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. However, the costs of rTKA are high, and there is a paucity of data evaluating the cost-effectiveness of rTKA. We aimed to analyze the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of rTKA relative to manual TKA. METHODS: A Markov decision analysis was performed using known parameters for costs, outcomes, implant survivorships, and mortalities. The cost-effectiveness of rTKA relative to manual TKA was assessed for end-stage knee osteoarthritis patients who had a mean age of 65 years (range, 27 to 94 years). The rTKA costs were calculated for a pay-per-use contract robot. RESULTS: Using the Markov Model with an annual case volume of 500 patients and a mean age of 65 years, the overall health gain per patient was 13.34 QALYs after rTKA and 13.31 QALYs after manual TKA. This resulted in an overall gain in QALYs of 0.03 for each patient undergoing an rTKA compared with manual TKA and an incremental cost of $128,526 Singapore Dollars per QALY. CONCLUSION: Robotic TKA is not a cost-effective alternative to conventional TKA using a pay-per-use contract robot.

Clinical Interpretability of Quadriceps Strength and Gait Speed Performance in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Longitudinal Study.

OBJECTIVE: After a total knee arthroplasty, physical assessments of quadriceps strength and gait speed performance are often undertaken during rehabilitation. Our study aimed to improve their clinical interpretability by examining trajectory curves across levels of self-reported walking and stair climbing function. DESIGN: A sample of 2624 patients with primary total knee arthroplasty participated in this retrospective longitudinal study. Monthly, for 4 mos after surgery, quadriceps strength and gait speed were quantified. At the month-6 time point, self-reported walking and stair climbing function was measured. RESULTS: All physical measures improved nonlinearly over time. In mixed-effects models, greater quadriceps strength and gait speed over time were associated with higher month-6 self-reported walking and stair climbing function ( P < 0.001). Steeper gains in quadriceps strength and gait speed were associated with higher levels of walking and stair-climbing function (interaction P < 0.001). Among female patients who had great difficulty with stair ascent and ambulation, quadriceps strength trajectory curves plateaued after 8 wks after total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: By stratifying trajectory curves across clinically interpretable functional levels, our findings potentially provide patients and clinicians a means to better interpret the continuous-scaled quadriceps strength and gait speed values. This information may be valuable when engaging patients in shared decision making and expectation setting. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME. CME OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Understand how self-reported walking and stair climbing abilities improved from baseline before total knee arthroplasty (total knee arthroplasty) to 6 mos postoperatively; (2) Describe the time course of the 2 performance-based measures of quadriceps strength and walking speed after a total knee arthroplasty; and (3) Relate the trajectories of post-total knee arthroplasty quadriceps strength and walking speed measurements across distinct levels of self-reported walking and stair climbing function. LEVEL: Advanced. ACCREDITATION: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty outcomes were equivalent to patients' own pre-failure state but inferior to patients without revision.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to (1) longitudinally compare the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the same patients who underwent primary TKA and revision TKA, and (2) compared the results of these revision TKA with a matched cohort of well-functioning primary TKA. The hypothesis was revision TKA could result in equivalent outcomes to patients' own primary TKA or the primary TKA of patients who did not require revision. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 123 patients who underwent primary TKA and subsequently aseptic revision TKA ("revised group"), were matched using nearest-neighbor method to 123 well-functioning primary TKA that did not require revision ("control group"). Preoperative (prior to primary TKA), at time of failure (prior to revision TKA), postoperative 6-month and 2-year PROMs included Knee Society scores (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) attainment was analyzed. Wilcoxon and McNemar's tests were used to compare outcomes within the revised group (primary vs revision), Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-Square test for the revised and control groups. RESULTS: The revised group had poorer KSS objective (p = 0.045), KSS functional (p < 0.001), OKS (p = 0.011) and SF-36 PCS (p < 0.001) at time of failure (prior to revision TKA), compared to their preoperative PROMs (prior to primary TKA). Revision TKA resulted in restoration of KSS objective, OKS and SF-36 PCS (NS) that were equivalent to their primary TKA, but poorer KSS functional (p < 0.050). Patients in the revised group had a lower proportion of MCID attainment in KSS objective (p = 0.014) and OKS (p < 0.001) at 2-year after primary TKA when compared to the control group. Revision TKA also led to poorer KSS objective, KSS functional and SF-36 PCS (p < 0.050) when compared to primary TKA of the control group. CONCLUSION: Outcomes following aseptic revision were equivalent to patients' own pre-failure state but inferior to patients with non-revised implants. An individualized approach toward goal setting and assessing adequacy of aseptic revision TKA can be adopted based on patients' pre-failure outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Bone-on-Bone Contact on Radiograph is not a Prerequisite for Successful Outcome in Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty-A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients without bone-on-bone osteoarthritis are excluded from mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty due to higher revision rates and poorer outcomes. However, we do not know if the same indication applies to fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty implants. Our study aims to compare functional outcomes and revision rates in patients with and without bone-on-bone arthritis undergoing fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 153 fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in a single institution. Patients were divided into four groups based on joint space remaining measured on preoperative radiographs. Group 1 included knees with bone-on-bone contact; group 2 included knees with less than 2 mm joint space; group 3 included knees with 2 to 4 mm joint space; group 4 included knees with more than 4 mm joint space. Patients were followed up for 10 years postoperatively and assessed using the Oxford Knee Score, the Functional Score and Knee Score from the Knee Society Clinical Rating Score, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey. RESULTS: There was no difference in terms of demographic data and preoperative scores. Postoperative Knee Society Functional Score was found to be lower in group 1 as compared with the other groups. There was no difference between the four groups of patients in terms of Knee Society Knee Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores from the Short Form 36 Health Survey. There was no difference in terms of survivorship free from all-cause revision at a minimum of 10 years' follow-up. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients with varying degrees of arthritis on preoperative radiographs had comparable clinical outcomes. We conclude that symptomatic patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of medial compartment osteoarthritis of any grade can benefit from a fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

The patient acceptable symptom state for the knee society score, oxford knee score and short form-36 following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a target value on a patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) scale beyond which patients deem themselves to have attained an acceptable outcome. This study aimed to define the PASS thresholds for generic and knee-specific PROMs at 2 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 955 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis at a single institution was reviewed. Patients were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Function Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS). Responses to an anchor question assessing patients' overall rating of treatment results were dichotomized and used to determine if PASS was achieved. PASS thresholds for each PROM were selected based on the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Sensitivity analyses were performed for different subgroups (by age, gender, BMI), baseline score tertiles and an alternate definition of PASS. RESULTS: In total, 92.7% reported their current state as acceptable. The areas under the curve (AUC) for ROCs were 0.72-0.83, except for the SF-36 PCS (AUC 0.64), indicating good discriminative accuracy of the other PROMs. PASS thresholds were 85.5 for KSKS, 77.5 for KSFS, 41.5 for OKS, 49.9 for SF-36 PCS and 54.6 for SF-36 MCS. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the thresholds were robust. Patients who attained a PASS were at least 4-5 times more likely to be satisfied and have expectations fulfilled. CONCLUSION: PASS thresholds can be used to define treatment success in future outcome studies. At the individual level, they provide clinically relevant benchmarks for surgeons when assessing postoperative recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.