Long-term comparative outcomes between 2 common ureteroneocystostomy techniques for renal transplantation.

PURPOSE: We compared the incidence of ureteral complications between the classic (Lich-Gregoir) technique and the recently popularized single stitch (Shanfield) technique in renal transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of 721 consecutive transplant recipients from May 1999 to July 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Ureteral and nonureteral complications were reviewed at 3 to 5-year followup. RESULTS: Of the 721 recipients evaluated 713 were included in the study. There were 360 recipients in the Lich-Gregoir group and 353 in the Shanfield group. A significantly higher rate of ureteral complications occurred in the Shanfield group compared to the Lich-Gregoir group (15.6% vs 3.9%, p <0.0001). The Shanfield group consisted of 20 patients with ureteral leakage, 21 with hematuria, 11 with strictures and 3 who had ureteral stones. The Lich-Gregoir group had 8 patients with ureteral leakage, 5 with hematuria and 1 with a stricture. In comparison, urinary tract infections, delayed graft function and rejection rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups (p = 0.76, 0.12 and 0.19, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other reports, the Shanfield group had significantly more ureteral complications. In particular the Shanfield technique may predispose patients to higher rates of hematuria and stone formation. Based on this large series and published meta-analyses we believe that the stented Lich-Gregoir anastomosis is the superior ureteroneocystostomy technique in renal transplantation.

Modified "tubeless" percutaneous nephrolithotomy using a tail-stent.

INTRODUCTION: "Tubeless" percutaneous renal surgery has previously been described at our institution. Avoiding external nephrostomy tube drainage significantly decreases the pain and morbidity of percutaneous renal surgery. However, internal drainage with a double-J ureteral stent still results in bothersome bladder symptoms, especially in younger male patients. In addition, removal of the stent requires uncomfortable office cystoscopy. We report a technical enhancement of our "tubeless" technique that uses a novel tail-stent for internal drainage. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: A tubeless approach to any renal surgery should only be attempted in select uncomplicated cases. The exclusion criteria should include operative times longer than 2 hours, three or more percutaneous accesses, significant perforations or disruptions of the collecting system, significant residual stone burden, and significant bleeding. In these instances, and when second-look nephroscopy is desired, traditional external nephrostomy tube drainage should be used. In our select cases, in lieu of the standard double-J stent, we place a 7F/3F tail-stent with the string attached exiting the urethral meatus. Care is taken in correct placement to avoid having the tail of the stent exiting the meatus. CONCLUSIONS: In our initial 4 patients, tail-stents were successfully placed. The pain scores were low and stent symptoms appeared minimal. All stents were easily removed without the use of cystoscopy. Fluoroscopic visualization of the 3F tail is poor, and positioning of the tail can be difficult. Nevertheless, this modification appears feasible and safe with excellent patient satisfaction.