Is YouTube a Useful Source of Information on Pressure Injuries? A Content, Reliability, and Quality Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comprehensiveness, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos related to pressure injuries. METHODS: The authors searched YouTube for relevant videos using the keywords "pressure injury", "pressure ulcer", "bedsore", "pressure injury etiology", "pressure injury classification", "pressure injury prevention", "pressure injury risk assessment", and "pressure injury management". Of the 1,023 videos screened, 269 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. For each video, the authors recorded the number of views, likes, and comments; the length; and the video upload source. The Comprehensiveness Assessment Tool for Pressure Injuries, the Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information score, and the Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the comprehensiveness, reliability, and quality of the videos. RESULTS: The mean length of the 269 videos was 6.22 ± 4.62 minutes (range, 0.18-19.47 minutes). Only 14.5% of the videos (n = 39) were uploaded by universities or professional organizations. Most videos included information about PI prevention (69.5%), followed by PI management (27.9%). The mean comprehensiveness score was 2.33 ± 1.32 (range, 1-5). Nearly half of the videos (49.1%) were not reliable. However, the quality of 43.9% of the videos was somewhat useful. The Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information mean scores of universities/professional organizations (P < .001), nonprofit healthcare professionals (P = .015), and independent health information channel videos (P = .026) were higher than the mean score of medical advertising/profit companies channel videos. CONCLUSIONS: This study draws attention to the need for more comprehensive, high-quality, and reliable videos about PIs. It is important that videos on YouTube provide comprehensive and reliable information for patients, caregivers, students, or providers seeking information on PI prevention, assessment, and management.

Effect of a mobile patient education application on adjustment to stoma and development of peristomal skin lesions: a quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a stoma face difficulties in everyday life. A mobile application (app) may assist them in managing their stoma and adjusting to change. PURPOSE: This study developed a mobile app for patients with a stoma and evaluated its effectiveness in improving psychosocial adjustment, self-care, and prevention of peristomal skin lesions. METHODS: The research utilized a quasi-experimental design and was conducted using a posttest control group. The study consisted of 60 patients who had undergone surgery in 3 university hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey, from November 2018 through December 2019. The experimental group (n = 30) used the STOMA-M mobile app, and the control group (n = 30) used an educational booklet that contained images and text that correlated to the content found in the app. Data collection was carried out using an individual characteristics assessment form, Ostomy Adjustment Inventory (OAI-23), Peristomal Skin Lesions Assessment and Classification Instrument, and a stoma care training evaluation form in the first and third months after discharge. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 software. RESULTS: Sociodemographic characteristics of individuals in the experimental and control groups were similar; 70% (n = 42) required stoma placement because of cancer treatment. More than half of the participants (53.3%; n = 32) had an ileostomy, and 78.3% (n = 47) had a temporary, open stoma. The experimental group's OAI-23 score, social engagement subscale score, stoma care status, and satisfaction with education e high. The OAI-23 scores in the control group were not significant, and their anger subscale score and the score of item 16, Caring for my stoma is difficult, decreased in the third month compared with baseline. Peristomal skin lesions did not develop in the control group at the third month of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The levels of adjustment to stoma, ability to care for the stoma themselves, and satisfaction with education received were higher in individuals using the mobile app compared with those using the printed booklet. However, the app was not effective in preventing peristomal skin lesions. Additional studies are needed to determine what features of a mobile app may be useful for preventing such lesions.