Effects of a flash-free system on dental plaque accumulation and bonding-debonding process: A clinical study.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of a flash-free (FF) System on (1) the amount of plaque accumulation around the braces on buccal surfaces of the teeth, (2) the time required for the placement of brackets, including the clean-up of the flash, (3) the amount of adhesive left on the tooth after debonding, and (4) time required for adhesive remnant clean-up. METHODS: Thirty-six patients (aged 19.96 ± 5.74 years) were randomly distributed to receive adhesive precoat (APC)-FF and APC-Plus ceramic brackets on the maxillary right or left anterior 6 teeth. Bonding and debonding time were measured per segment in milliseconds. A plaque revealer agent was applied to discolor the dental plaque, and a modified plaque accumulation index was used to evaluate the amount of plaque at 2 different time points. An adhesive residue index was used after the debonding. RESULTS: The mean bonding times were 138.87 seconds (8332.47 milliseconds) and 77.82 seconds (4669.31 milliseconds) for APC-Plus and APC-FF, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P ≤0.001). The difference between the mean debonding times was not statistically significant. A significant difference was found between the adhesive residue index scores of the 2 systems (P ≤0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between plaque accumulation scores at first- and second-time points for both adhesive systems. APC-Plus score (0.94 ± 0.98) was higher than the APC-FF score (0.50 ± 0.91) on the incisal side at the second time point (P ≤0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FF adhesives can be a good alternative to reduce chair time in bonding appointments.

Intrapulpal Temperature Increase During Er:YAG Laser-Aided Debonding of Ceramic Brackets.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temperature changes in the pulp chamber while using a newly introduced application of Er:YAG laser to debond ceramic brackets in a study model with a pulpal circulation with and without thermocycled samples. BACKGROUND DATA: An esthetic alternative to stainless steel brackets, ceramic brackets have been proposed. However, because of their low fracture resistance and high bond strengths, ceramic brackets can cause a problem when they are being removed using conventional techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental Groups A and B were established for samples with or without thermocycling. The same 20 maxillary central incisor and 20 premolar teeth were used in both groups. Pulpal blood microcirculation was simulated using an apparatus described in a previous study. Monocrystalline brackets were bonded by using Transbond XT. In Group A, brackets were debonded using the Er:YAG laser (600 mJ, 2 Hz, long pulse, and no air or water spray) after being stored in distilled water for 24 h. In Group B, brackets were debonded using the same laser system as that used in Group A after being stored in distilled water for 24 h and then thermocycled for a total of 5000 cycles between 5°C and 55°C. The laser irradiation duration and intrapulpal temperature changes were measured. RESULTS: In Group B, the intrapulpal temperature increase of the central incisors was significantly higher than that of the premolar teeth. In the central incisor and premolar teeth groups, there were no statistically significant difference between Groups A and B (p > 0.05). A positive correlation was found between laser irradiation duration and temperature increase (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of Er:YAG laser is an effective method for debonding the monocrystalline ceramic brackets. This method can be used safely under the consideration of intrapulpal temperature changes.