Additive manufacturing trueness and internal fit of crowns in resin modified with a commercially available ceramic composite concentrate.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Inorganic fillers can be incorporated into additively manufactured (AM) resins to improve their properties, and a ceramic composite concentrate has been recently marketed for this purpose. However, knowledge on the printability of AM resins modified with this concentrate is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the manufacturing trueness and internal fit of AM crowns in a dental resin modified with a commercially available ceramic composite concentrate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A maxillary right first molar typodont tooth was prepared and digitized to design a crown in standard tessellation language (STL) format. This STL file was used to fabricate a total of 30 AM crowns, 10 with a resin with no fillers for interim restorations (AM-I), 10 AM-I resin incorporated with ceramic composite concentrate (AM-IR), and 10 with a ceramic-filled resin intended for definitive restorations (AM-D). The modification of the AM-IR resin was performed by mechanically mixing 30 wt% of a commercially available ceramic composite concentrate into AM-I. An intraoral scanner was used to digitize all crowns, which were then seated on the prepared typodont abutment and rescanned. The manufacturing trueness of each crown was measured in 4 regions (overall, external, intaglio, and marginal) and reported with root mean square (RMS) estimates. The internal gaps were calculated by using a triple scan protocol. The intaglio surface deviations were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests, while the remaining data were analyzed with the 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests (α=.05). RESULTS: AM-IR had the highest overall and external RMS and had higher intaglio RMS than AM-D (P≤.001). AM-I had the lowest marginal RMS (P≤.002). AM-IR had the highest average gap values (P≤.027). CONCLUSIONS: AM-IR crowns mostly had lower trueness and high internal gaps. However, the differences among the tested materials in fabrication trueness and average gap values were small, and internal gaps were within the previously reported thresholds.

Accuracy and time efficiency of conventional and digital outlining of extensions of denture foundation on preliminary casts.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this diagnostic study was to assess the accuracy and time efficiency of a digital method to draw the denture foundation extension outline on preliminary casts compared with the conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 28 preliminary edentulous casts with no anatomical landmarks were digitized using a laboratory scanner. The outlining of the entire basal seat of the denture was performed on preliminary casts and digitized. Casts with no extension outline were digitized and outlines were drawn using software (DWOS, Straumann). The accuracy of the extension outlined between both techniques was evaluated in the software (GOM Inspect; GOM GmbH) by file superimposition. Specificity and sensitivity tests were applied to measure accuracy. The paired t-test (95% CI) was used to compare the mean total area and the working time. RESULTS: The accuracy ranged from 0.57 to 0.92. The buccal and labial frenulum showed a lower value in the maxilla (0.57); while the area between the retromolar pad and buccal frenulum (0.64) showed a lower score in the mandible. The maxillary denture foundation and the working time for both arches were significantly longer for the digital method (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The denture foundation extension outline exhibited a sufficiently excellent accuracy for the digital method, except for the maxillary anterior region. However, the digital method required a longer working time.

Influence of digital implant analog design on the positional trueness of an analog in additively manufactured models: An in-vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists regarding the accuracy of implant analog position in printed models, particularly when implant analogs with varying designs are used. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of digital implant analog (DIA) design on the trueness of their position in additively manufactured digital implant models (DIMs) and to compare with that of a conventional implant analog in a stone cast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dentate maxillary model with a conventional implant analog (Nobel Biocare Implant Replica 4.3 mm CC RP) at left second premolar site was digitized by using a laboratory scanner (3Shape D2000) and a (SB) scan body to generate the master standard tessellation language (STL) file (M0). 12 custom trays were fabricated on M0 file and conventional polyvinylsiloxane impressions of the model were made. All impressions were poured after inserting conventional implant analogs (Nobel RP Implant Replica) (Group A). Model was then digitized with an intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3) and the same SB, and DIMs with three different DIA designs (Nobel Biocare [Group B], Elos [Group C], and NT-trading [Group D]) were generated (Dental System-Model Builder). 12 DIMs of each design were additively manufactured and corresponding DIAs were inserted. All models were digitized by using the same laboratory scanner and SB, and these STLs were transferred to a 3D analysis software (Geomagic Control X), where the STL files of the models were superimposed over M0. Linear and 3D deviations at three selected points on SB (implant-abutment connection, most cervical point on SB, and most coronal point on SB) as well as angular deviations on two planes (buccolingual and mesiodistal) were calculated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni corrected t-tests were used to analyze the trueness of implant analog positions (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The interaction of main effects significantly affected linear (p < 0.001) and angular deviations (p = 0.020). At point 1, group D had higher deviations than groups A and B (p ≤ 0.015). In addition, groups A and D had higher deviations than group B at point 4 (p < 0.001). While group C had similar linear deviations to those of other groups at point 1 and point 4 (p ≥ 0.192), the differences among test groups at point 2 were nonsignificant (p ≥ 0.276). Group B had lower angular deviations than groups C (p = 0.039) and D (p = 0.006) on buccolingual plane. CONCLUSIONS: Analog design affected the trueness of analog position as proprietary, pressure/friction fit DIA (group B) had higher linear trueness than screw-retained DIA (Group D) and conventional implant analog (group A). In addition, pressure/friction fit DIA had the highest angular trueness among tested DIAs.

Conventional and digital impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: time, implant quantity effect and patient satisfaction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effect of impression type (conventional vs digital) and the number of implants on the time from the impressions to the generation of working casts of mandibular implant-supported fixed complete-arch frameworks, as well as on patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 17 participants, 3 or 4 implants, received 2 types of digital impression methods (DI) and conventional (CI). In DI, two techniques were performed: scanning with the scan bodies (SC) and scanning with a device attached to the scan bodies (SD) (BR 10 2019 026265 6). In CI, the making of a solid index (SI) and open-tray impression (OT) were used. The outcomes were used to evaluate the time and the participant satisfaction with conventional and digital impressions. The time was evaluated through the timing of the time obtained in the workflow in the conventional and digital impression. The effect of the number of implants on time was also assessed. Satisfaction was assessed through a questionnaire based on seven. The Wilcoxon test used to identify the statistical difference between the groups in terms of time. The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the relationship between the time and the number of implants. Fisher's test was used to assess the patient satisfaction (P < .05). RESULTS: The time with DI was shorter than with CI (DI, x̃=02:58; CI, x̃=31:48) (P < .0001). The arches rehabilitated with 3 implants required shorter digital impression time (3: x̃=05:36; 4: x̃=09:16) (P < .0001). Regarding satisfaction, the DI was more comfortable and pain-free than the CI (P < .005). CONCLUSION: Digital impressions required shorter chair time and had higher patient acceptance than conventional impressions.

Does ureteral access sheat usage lead to permanent damage in the ureter? A placebo controlled trial in a rabbit model.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical stenosis or precursor histological changes that ureteral access sheaths commonly used in ureteroscopic surgeries may cause in the long term in ureter. METHODS: In this study, the animals were divided into 9 groups and according to their groups, ureters of the rabbits were endoscopically fitted with 2F and 3F ureter catheters. The catheters were left in place and withdrawn after a specified period of time. All the ureters were excised and evaluated macroscopically, microscopically and histologically. Ureter diameters were measured and FGF-2 (+) labeled fibroblasts were counted in connective tissue as stenosis precursors. RESULTS: Macroscopically or microscopically, no stenosis was found in any group. The ureter diameter of the group that were catheterized for the longest time with the catheter that had the widest diameter was significantly lower than the group with the shorter duration and the catheter with the narrower diameter and the control group. When the groups were compared in terms of their FGF values, there was a significant difference in FGF-2 counts at all three ureter levels (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of ureteral access sheath may lead to histological changes, as its diameter and duration increase.

Does ureteral access sheat usage lead to permanent damage in the ureter? A placebo controlled trial in a rabbit model

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical stenosis or precursor histological changes that ureteral access sheaths commonly used in ureteroscopic surgeries may cause in the long term in ureter. Methods: In this study, the animals were divided into 9 groups and according to their groups, ureters of the rabbits were endoscopically fitted with 2F and 3F ureter catheters. The catheters were left in place and withdrawn after a specified period of time. All the ureters were excised and evaluated macroscopically, microscopically and histologically. Ureter diameters were measured and FGF-2 (+) labeled fibroblasts were counted in connective tissue as stenosis precursors. Results: Macroscopically or microscopically, no stenosis was found in any group. The ureter diameter of the group that were catheterized for the longest time with the catheter that had the widest diameter was significantly lower than the group with the shorter duration and the catheter with the narrower diameter and the control group. When the groups were compared in terms of their FGF values, there was a significant difference in FGF-2 counts at all three ureter levels (p 0.05). Conclusion: The use of ureteral access sheath may lead to histological changes, as its diameter and duration increase.(AU)