A New Clinical Tool for Scoliosis Risk Analysis: Scoliosis Tele-Screening Test.

STUDY DESIGN: Methodological, observational clinical study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a virtual screening test to detect scoliosis risk initially by parents without the need for medical visit during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The scoliosis screening program has been implemented to early detect scoliosis. Unfortunately, access to health professionals was limited during the pandemic. However, during this time, interest in telemedicine has increased remarkably. Recently, mobile applications related to postural analysis were developed, but none permits evaluation by parents. METHODS: Researchers developed the Scoliosis Tele-Screening Test (STS-Test), which included drawing-based images of body asymmetries, to assess the scoliosis-associated risk factors. The STS-Test was shared on social networks, allowing the parents to evaluate their children. After test completion, the risk score was generated automatically, and children with medium and high risks were then advised for medical consultation for further evaluation. The test accuracy and consistency between the clinician and parents were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 865 tested children, 358 (41.4%) consulted clinicians to confirm their STS-Test results. Scoliosis was then confirmed in 91 children (25.4%). The parents were able to detect asymmetry in 50% of the lumbar/thoracolumbar curvatures and 82% of the thoracic curvatures. In addition, the forward bend test revealed favorable agreement between parents and clinicians (r =0.809, p<0.0005). Internal consistency of the esthetic deformities domain in the STS-Test was also excellent (α=0.901). This tool was 94.97% accurate, 83.51% sensitive, and 98.87% specific. CONCLUSIONS: The STS-Test is a new parent-friendly, virtual, cost-effective, result-oriented, and reliable tool for scoliosis screening. It allows parents to actively participate in the early detection of scoliosis by screening their children for the risk of scoliosis periodically without the need to visit the health institution.

Cross-cultural validation of the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life questionnaire: the ISYQOL international.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and its treatments can severely impact health-related quality of life. The Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) questionnaire, initially developed in Italian and tested on Italian people, was created to measure quality of life in young persons with spine changes. ISYQOL was created using the Rasch analysis, a modern psychometric technique for questionnaires' assessment and development, which showed that the ordinal scores of the ISYQOL Italian version provide sound quality of life measures. AIM: The current work aims to evaluate the cross-cultural equivalence of the ISYQOL questionnaire in seven different countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, international, multi-centre study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. POPULATION: Five hundred fifty persons with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from English Canada, French Canada, Greece, Italy, Spain, Poland, and Türkiye. METHODS: The ISYQOL Italian version was translated into six languages with the forward-backwards procedure. The conceptual equivalence of the items' content was verified, and any inconsistency was resolved by consensus. The Rasch analysis was used here to evaluate that ISYQOL translations retained the good measurement properties of the Italian version of the questionnaire. In addition, the Differential Item Functioning (DIF) was checked to assess the psychometric equivalence of the ISYQOL items in patients from different countries. RESULTS: Four items of the translated ISYQOL were dropped from the questionnaire since they did not contribute to measuring due to their poor fit to the model of Rasch. Seven items were affected by DIF for nationality, a finding pointing out that these items do not work the same (i.e. are not equivalent) in the different countries. Thanks to the Rasch analysis, the DIF for nationality was amended, and ISYQOL International was eventually obtained. CONCLUSIONS: ISYQOL International returns interval quality of life measures in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with high cross-cultural equivalence in the tested countries. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Rigorous testing showed that ISYQOL International ordinal scores return quality of life measures cross-culturally equivalent in English and French Canada, Greece, Italy, Spain, Poland, and Türkiye. A new, psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome measure is thus available in rehabilitation medicine to measure health-related quality of life in idiopathic scoliosis.

Comparison of two different delivery methods of home-based exercise on neck pain.

AIM: This study aimed to compare the effects of two different home-based exercise delivery methods on compliance, pain, and disability in participants with non-specific neck pain. MATERIALS & METHODS: The study, which was carried out at Istanbul Arel University between February and May 2018, was carried out with 60 participants from university staff, aged 25-60, suffering from non-specific neck pain. The cases were randomly assigned to two groups. A home exercise method with printed material exercise was given to the patients in Group 1, and a video phone reminder exercise was given to Group 2 for six weeks in both groups. Pain severity and neck disability were evaluated before and after the exercise with the 'Visual Analogue Scale' and the 'Neck Pain and Disability Score.' RESULTS: Descriptive statistics showed that the video phone reminder exercise group had greater compliance. Neck pain and neck disability assessments improved before and after the exercise in both groups (p < .001). Statistical analysis revealed that video phone reminder exercise scores were significantly higher than those of the control group. Effect sizes were evaluated between the two groups, and the difference between them were found to be clinically significant (d > 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: The home exercise method with video and telephone reminders, which can be applied instead of the traditional method provided with printed materials, is more effective for compliance, pain severity, and neck disability. Trial registration: NCT04135144. Registered on 21 September 2019. Retrospectively.

Leg length discrepancy and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: clinical and radiological characteristics.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to present the clinical and radiological features of functional scoliosis due to LLD and LLD concurrent with AIS; it also aimed to define their relationships for differentiating functional scoliosis due to LLD and LLD concurrent with AIS. METHODS: This study was conducted as a single-center retrospective comparative study on 47 scoliosis patients with diagnosed LLD, aged 10-18 years. Cases with a diagnosis of structural LLD were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of concurrent AIS. Data on demographics and the angle of trunk rotation on a sacral basis (ATRsacrum) were recorded. Limb length was clinically measured with a tape measure and clinical LLD (C-LLD) scoliometer test. Cobb angle, axial rotation, pelvic obliquity, and radiological LLD (R-LLD) were obtained from standing spine radiographs and measured by two blinded orthopedic spine surgeons. RESULTS: The prevalence of LLD was 6.7% in scoliosis patients in our study population. Cobb angle and apical rotation were higher in the LLD concurrent with AIS group than in the LLD group (p ≤ 0.05). The C-LLDscoliometer test results were strongly correlated with both C-LLDtape measure (r = 0.651; p = 0.000) and ATRsacrum (r = 0.688; p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: LLD may develop as a result of adaptive changes due to scoliosis, or a concurrent condition to scoliosis. Cobb angle and apical rotation are the features that differentiate AIS from functional scoliosis in patients with LLD. The C-LLD scoliometer test can be an effective, practical, and useful method for measuring C-LLD, but its validity and reliability should be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT04713397, date of registration: 01/14/2021). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Turkey: an epidemiological study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Studies have shown that adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) prevalence varies between 0.35% and 5.2% and it is generally accepted as an average of 2%-3% in children under age 16. There are a few narrow-scope studies based on school screening performed on the epidemiology of AIS in Turkey. Prevalence rates reported by these studies are lower than reported in neighboring countries. Of note, they were conducted in single cities, generally based on small sample size, and are different from each other in terms of methodology and age groups. The present study was conducted based on a large population in 85 schools of 40 provinces in Turkey. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of AIS in Turkey. Secondary outcomes were to determine age, gender, curve distribution, using standard tests, and radiological verification. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional epidemiological study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample size was calculated to estimate the prevalence of AIS in children aged 10-15 years in Turkey. OUTCOME MEASURES: Adams' forward bending test, angle of trunk rotation measurement, and posture analysis were used to screen. Students who had an angle of trunk rotation greater than or equal to five (≧5°) with scoliometer measurement or who had a positive forward bending test were referred to the mobile X-ray unit located in the school-yard on screening day. Their diagnosis was confirmed using Cobb angles of greater than or equal to 10 (≧10°). METHODS: Medical personnel, mobile radiological tools, and logistical support needed during fieldwork were provided by the Directorate General for Health Research, Ministry of Health Republic of Turkey. Spine and posture were examined in upright standing position. Examiners looked for shoulder asymmetries, scapular prominence, unequal waist, and lower limb length discrepancy. Potential scoliosis diagnosis was verified with onsite radiographic examination. Cases with a Cobb angle of ≧10° detected in any region were accepted as scoliosis. The direction and location of scoliosis were determined according to the Scoliosis Research Society terminology criteria. RESULTS: A total of 16,045 students were reached whose informed consent forms were signed by their parents. The prevalence of AIS was found to be 2.3% (female, 3.1%; male, 1.5%). Radiological confirmation rate was 98.8%; 256 (69.3%) of 369 adolescents with scoliosis had a single curvature and 108 (29.3%) had a double curvature. The most common single curve type was a lumbar curve. In all, 90.5% of cases with AIS had a mild (range of 10°-19°) Cobb angle. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AIS was 2.3% in Turkey. This prevalence rate was considerably higher than the values in previous regional studies conducted in Turkey; however, it was close to generally accepted averages in the literature. One of the strongest aspects of the study was that radiologic confirmation of each suspected case was made during the screening.

Hypermobility Frequency in School Children: Relationship With Idiopathic Scoliosis, Age, Sex and Musculoskeletal Problems.

Objectives: This study aims to assess the prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) in school children in relation to scoliosis and to identify musculoskeletal problems. Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included 822 school children (413 males, 409 females; mean age 12.2±1.3 years; range, 10 and 15 years). Demographic characteristics of all children were recorded. The presence of GJH was assessed by the Beighton score (≥4 was considered joint hypermobility). Scoliosis screening consisted of forward bend test (FBT) and measurement of angle of trunk rotation (ATR). Positive FBT or ATR ≥5° was referred to a portable X-ray device. The presence of musculoskeletal complaints was determined by a questionnaire. Results: Children's Body Mass Index (BMI) was 19.6±4.1. GJH was diagnosed in 151 subjects (18.4%). No significant association was detected between sex and hypermobility. Joint hypermobility was inversely correlated with age and BMI. Scoliosis was found in 43 subjects (5.2%) and all of them except one girl had mild scoliosis. The most common scoliosis pattern was a single left thoracolumbar curve. Seventy-three subjects (8.9%) had Cobb angle under 10°, with a potential for progression. Among subjects having GJH, the most common clinical finding was pes planus (34.3%) and the most common clinical symptom was ankle sprain (31.3%). Conclusion: Similar to that found in children from many countries, GJH is a common clinical condition in Turkish children. GJH should be assessed in the differential diagnosis of adolescents with musculoskeletal complaints for effective treatment and reducing morbidity. GJH should be considered in adolescents with scoliosis, which may be an important aspect in treatment.

Single-nucleotide polymorphism in Turkish patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: curve progression is not related with MATN-1, LCT C/T-13910, and VDR BsmI.

The role of genetics in the etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is unclear. In this study, we investigated the relationship between AIS and polymorphisms in MATN-1, LCT C/T-13910, and VDR BsmI genes. 53 Turkish adolescents with diagnosed AIS and 54 healthy adult individuals were included in the study. MATN-1, LCT C/T-13910, and VDR BsmI gene mutations were analyzed with real-time PCR. We did not detect a statistically significant difference between AIS and control groups in respect to those three different gene polymorphisms (p < 0.05). We next evaluated the associations of all three SNPs with scoliosis curve severity. There was no significant difference between curve severity and gene polymorphisms (p < 0.05). In terms of gene polymorphisms, AIS patients with a family history of AIS did not significantly differ from AIS patients who did not have history (p < 0.05). AIS might be caused by many different gene mutations, biomechanical mechanisms that have been modified by environmental factors, different biological interactions, modulation of growth, or a synergy of different factors causing abnormal control of growth. However, the existing knowledge is still not enough to explain the etiopathogenesis of AIS.

The efficacy of balneotherapy and physical modalities on the pulmonary system of patients with fibromyalgia.

Effects of balneotherapy on Primary Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) have been studied well, except for its effect on the respiratory symptoms of FMS. In this study we allocated 56 patients with FMS into three groups who matched according to age, gender and duration of illness. All three groups received the same three physical therapy modalities (PTM): transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), ultrasound (US) and infrared (IR). The first group received PTM plus balneotherapy (PTM+BT), the second group received PTM alone (PTM), whilst the third group received PTM plus hydrotherapy (PTM+HT). All groups were treated for three weeks and in the same season. All patients were assessed at four time points: (a) at baseline, (b) on the 7th day of therapy, (c) at the end of therapy (after 3 weeks) and (d) at 6 months after the end of therapy. The effectiveness of treatments in all groups were evaluated in three main categories (pain, depressive and respiratory symptoms). Tender point count, total algometric measurements and pain with visual analog scale for pain; Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) for depression; dyspnea scale, and spirometric measurements for respiratory symptoms; plus quality of life with visual analog scale as a general measurement of effectiveness were taken at all four assessment time points.Both at the end of therapy and at the 6 months follow up significant improvements in dyspnea scale, and spirometric measurements, as well as in other measured parameters were observed in group PTM+BT. All groups achieved significant improvements in BDI and HDRS but scores of PTM and PTM+HT groups had overturned at 6 months follow up. Except second group which receieved PTM alone, pain evaluation assessments were improved at 6 month follow up in PTM+HT and PTM+BT groups. But PTM+BT group had more significant improvements at the end of therapy. PTM group had no significant change for dyspnea scale and spirometric measurements. PTM combined BT and HT groups achieved significant improvements at the end of therapies for dyspnea scale and spirometric measurements, but only PTM +BT group had significant improvements for dyspnea scale and spirometric measurements at six month follow up. The group of PTM+BT was significantly better than other groups. Our results suggest that supplementation of PTM with balneotherapy is effective on the respiratory and other symptoms of FMS and these effects were better than other protocols at 6 month follow up.

Turkish patients with osteoarthritis: their awareness of the side effects of NSAIDs.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The study aim was to determine the awareness of Turkish osteoarthritis patients of the side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. METHODS: The patients were interviewed by 138 doctors regarding the level of their knowledge of the side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. RESULTS: A total of 3,755 patients (female/male: 3/1, 35% > 65 years) were included in the study. 35.5% of the patients were aware of side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 85.4% and 11.5% were aware of the gastrointestinal and other system-related side effects, respectively. 51% had learned of the side effects from doctors, 19.8% received information from the package inserts, 21.3% had experienced side effects, and 10.0% and 0.8% had learned from their friends and pharmacist, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Turkish osteoarthritis patients have a moderate level of knowledge of side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Defining factors for knowledge of side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were geographical region, socio-economic level and gender. This study reveals the physician's responsibility to educate patients about the side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

The use and safety profile of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs among Turkish patients with osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the use and safety profile of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) among Turkish osteoarthritis patients. METHODS: Osteoarthritis patients were interviewed by 138 doctors from clinics in nine different cities. Doctors completed a questionnaire regarding non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use and safety profile while interviewing the patients. RESULTS: Totally 3,755 patients (female/male: 3/1, mean age 59.0 +/- 12.2 years), 3,442 under non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs treatment, were included in the study. The use of meloxicam (5.5% vs. 14.4%) and specific cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors (for celecoxib 3.3% vs. 12.2%; for rofecoxib 3.0% vs. 11.2%) increased more than that of other non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The most common side effects were epigastric burning (37%), other dyspeptic symptoms (25.3%), abdominal pain (17.0%), constipation (12.7%), nausea (10.6%) and diarrhea (3.0%). COX-2 selective and specific inhibitors had significantly lower incidence of dyspeptic complaints compared to non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. No difference was found between the different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs regarding the ratio of discontinuation of therapy due to inefficacy. The ratios of discontinuation due to side effects were lower in patients using COX-2 specific inhibitors compared to non-selective and selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: celecoxib (7.7%), rofecoxib (10.3%), etodolac (12.4%), meloxicam (12.6%), tenoxicam (16.5%), diclofenac (16.8%), ibuprofen (19.4%), and naproxen (27.4%). Discontinuation of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs due to dyspeptic complaint was significantly less for specific COX-2 inhibitors than for non-selective and selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: celecoxib (2.5%), rofecoxib (8.4%), meloxicam (9.5%), etodolac (13.4%), tenoxicam (14.0%), diclofenac (14.1%), ibuprofen (17.2%), and naproxen (24.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of meloxicam and specific COX-2 inhibitors seems to have increased more than that of other non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, if previously used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are considered. Fewer dyspeptic complaints have been reported with specific COX-2 inhibitors.