Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 22(1): 87-93, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25051536

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To report a single surgeon's experience with 120 laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures using conventional laparoscopic instruments and a homemade glove port system to treat benign gynecologic diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective chart analysis (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Eulji University Hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty patients who underwent LESS performed by a single surgeon to treat benign gynecologic diseases between November 2010 and November 2012. INTERVENTION: LESS using conventional instrumentation was performed using our specialized glove port technique, which consists of the combination of the homemade glove port system designed to minimalize collision of the trocar on the tip of the finger of the surgical glove, a sufficient rectus fasciotomy, the surgeon's position at the patient's head, and adequate positioning of the instruments. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The LESS procedures performed were laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (n = 50), ovarian cystectomy (n = 25), myomectomy (n = 14), oophorectomy (n = 11), salpingectomy (n = 9), fimbrioplasty or neosalpingstomy (n = 7), and adhesiolysis only (n = 4). Median patient age was 40 years, and median body mass index was 23. Median operative time was 100 minutes (range, 50-145 minutes) for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, 70 minutes (range, 30-150 minutes) for ovarian cystectomy, 107 minutes (range, 65-180 minutes) for myomectomy, 55 minutes (range, 25-130 minutes) for oophorectomy, 85 minutes (range, 35-110 minutes) for salpingectomy, 70 minutes (range, 25-140 minutes) for neosalpingostomy or fimbrioplasty, and 35 minutes (range, 30-60-minutes) for adhesiolysis only. All procedures were completed successfully without the need for additional ports or conversion to the standard laparoscopic approach. One perioperative complication occurred. The complication rate was 83% (1 of 120). Other postoperative complications were not observed at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that LESS using conventional laparoscopic instruments and our glove port technique is a feasible and safe technique for the surgical management of various gynecologic conditions. Therefore, our homemade glove port laparoscopic system used in our specialized technique provides a simple, cost-effective approach to LESS and would probably make laparoscopic procedures using conventional instruments easier.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 21(4): 695-701, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24509292

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to present the initial operative experience of solo surgeon single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) in the laparoscopic treatment of benign gynecologic diseases and to investigate its feasibility and surgical outcomes. Using a novel homemade laparoscope-anchored instrument system that consisted of a laparoscopic instrument attached to a laparoscope and a glove-wound retractor umbilical port, we performed solo surgeon SPLS in 13 patients between March 2011 and June 2012. Intraoperative complications and postoperative surgical outcomes were determined. The primary operative procedures performed were unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (n = 5), unilateral salpingectomy (n = 2), adhesiolysis (n = 1), and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (n = 5). Additional surgical procedures included additional adhesiolysis (n = 4) and ovarian drilling (n = 1).The primary indications for surgery were benign ovarian tumors (n = 5), ectopic pregnancy (n = 2), pelvic adhesion (infertility) (n = 1), and benign uterine tumors (n = 5). Solo surgeon SPLS was successfully accomplished in all procedures without a laparoscopic assistant. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Our laparoscope-anchored instrument system obviates the need for an additional laparoscopic assistant and enables SPLS to be performed by a solo surgeon. The findings show that with our system, solo surgeon SPLS is a feasible and safe alternative technique for the treatment of benign gynecologic diseases in properly selected patients.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Laparoscópios , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/instrumentação , Humanos , Histerectomia Vaginal , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Ovariectomia/métodos , Gravidez , Gravidez Ectópica/cirurgia , Salpingectomia/métodos , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgia , Umbigo , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...