An anoikis-related gene signature predicts prognosis, drug sensitivity, and immune microenvironment in cholangiocarcinoma.

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is a malignant invasive biliary tract carcinoma with a poor prognosis. Anoikis-related genes are prognostic features of a variety of cancers. However, the value of prognostication and therapeutic effect of anoikis-related genes in cholangiocarcinoma have not been reported. The aim of this research was developing an ARGs signature associated with cholangiocarcinoma patients. Methods: We introduced transcriptome data to discover genes that were differentially expressed in cholangiocarcinoma. Subsequently, WGCNA was utilized to screen critical module genes in reference to anoikis. The univariate Cox, Lasso regression and Kaplan-Meier survival were executed to build a prognostic signature. We further performed gene functional enrichment, immune microenvironment and immunotherapy analysis between two risk subgroups. Finally, the pRRophetic algorithm was applied to compare the half inhibitory concentration value of several drugs. Results: A grand total of 1844 genes with differential expression related to the cholangiocarcinoma patients were identified. Furthermore, we obtained 2678 key module genes related to anoikis. Then, a prognostic signature was developed using the 6 prognostic genes (FXYD2, PCBD1, C1RL, GMNN, LAMA4 and HACL1). Independent prognostic analysis showed that risk score and alcohol could function as separate prognostic variables. We found cetain distinction in the immune microenvironment between the two risk subgroups. Moreover, immunotherapy evaluation showed that the anoikis-related gene signature could be applied as a therapy predictor. Finally, Chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity results showed that the low-risk group responded better to bosutinib, gefitinib, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel, while the high-risk group responded better to axitinib, cisplatin, and imatinib. Conclusion: The prognostic signature comprised of FXYD2, PCBD1, C1RL, GMNN, LAMA4 and HACL1 based on anoikis-related genes was established, which provided theoretical basis and reference value for the research and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.

miR-188-5p and Host MALAT1 Regulate RBE Cell Migration, Invasion, and Apoptosis via Up-regulating PSMD10 in Cholangiocarcinoma.

The study is designed to explore the regulatory network that MALAT1 competitively binds with miR-188-5p to up-regulate PSMD10 to facilitate cholangiocarcinoma cell migration and invasion and suppress apoptosis. qRT-PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to examine the expression and positive signal of MALAT1 and miR-188-5p in cholangiocarcinoma tissues and HIBEC, HCCC-9810, RBE, and QBC939 cells. Western blot, qRT-PCR, and immunohistochemistry were selected to detect PSMD10 expression in cholangiocarcinoma tissues and cell lines. Dual luciferase reporter gene assay was adopted to verify that miR-188-5p targeted MALAT1 and PSMD10. qRT-PCR, pull down, and western blot were used to examine the regulation of MALAT1-miR-188-5p-PSMD10 axis. Transwell, wound healing assay, and Tunel cell apoptosis were adopted to respectively detect the regulatory abilities of MALAT1-miR-188-5p-PSMD10 axis on cell invasion, migration, and apoptosis. Western blot was used to detect the regulation mechanism of MALAT1 on Bax, Bcl-2, and caspase-3 proteins. Nude mice subcutaneous xenograft model of cholangiocarcinoma was established to examine the impacts of MALAT1 on subcutaneous tumor growth. Immunohistochemistry was adopted to examine the positive indicator of Ki67 antibodies and SMD10 antibodies in each group. MALAT1 and PSMD10 were highly expressed in cholangiocarcinoma tissues and cell lines, while miR-188-5p was lowly expressed. MALAT1 could competitively bind to miR-188-5p, and miR-188-5p could negatively regulate PSMD10. MALAT1, In-miR-188-5p, and PSMD10 could facilitate cell invasion and migration and inhibit apoptosis, while siMALAT1, miR-188-5p, and siPSMD10 produced an opposite result. MALAT1-miR-188-5p-PSMD10 axis could promote RBE cell invasion and migration and inhibit apoptosis, whereas siMALAT1-In-miR-188-5p-siPSMD10 axis showed an opposite result. On the other hand, it was verified that up-regulation/down-regulation of MALAT1 can inhibit/promote Bax and caspase-3 proteins and promote/inhibit the expression of Bcl-2 protein. MALAT1 could facilitate subcutaneous tumor growth and enhance cell proliferation and positive signal of PSMD10, while miR-188-5p worked in an opposite direction. MALAT1 competitively binds to miR-188-5p to up-regulate mRNA translation and protein expression of PSMD10, thereby facilitating cholangiocarcinoma cell invasion and migration and inhibiting its apoptosis. However, interfering MALAT1-miR-188-5p-PSMD10 axis could inhibit the occurrence and development of cholangiocarcinoma.

MiR-582 Down-Regulates Lissencephaly-1 (LIS1) via P-Akt and MMP-2 to Inhibit Cholangiocarcinoma Cell Proliferation and Invasion.

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is a primary malignant tumor, and its progression involves oncogene activation, the absence of tumor suppressor gene, abnormal signaling pathways and miRNA expression. MiRNAs are abnormally expressed in many types of tumors. Objective: This study aims to observe the effects of miR-582 on cholangiocarcinoma cell proliferation, S-phase arrest, migration and invasion and to analyze the regulation of miR-582 on LIS1 to clarify the real role of miR-582 in cholangiocarcinoma development. Materials and Methods: TCGA database of cholangiocarcinoma samples was analyzed. Dual fluorescence reporter and TargetScan were conducted to confirm whether LIS1 was the target gene of miR-582. Effects of miR-582 and LIS1 on HCC-9810 cell proliferation, S-phase cell ratio, migration and invasion were determined by CCK-8, Flow cytometry and Transwell, respectively, whereas the function of miR-582 on MMP-2 and P-Akt expression was identified by Western blotting. Nude mice xenograft model of cholangiocarcinoma was established to detect what miR-582 did for tumor growth. Results: TCGA showed that miR-582 was lowly expressed and LIS1 was highly expressed in tumor tissues compared with adjacent tissues. MiR-582 targeted LIS1 to inhibit MMP-2 and p-AKT expression. Transfection of miR-582 mimics could suppress HCC-9810 cell proliferation, S-stage arrest, migration and invasion, while LIS1 worked oppositely. MiR-582 inhibitors promoted cell biological behavior, whereas LIS1 siRNA was opposite. In nude mice xenograft model, miR-582 overexpression inhibited tumor growth. Conclusions: It implies that miR-582 could negatively regulate LIS1 to inhibit MMP-2 and P-Akt expression, thus suppressing cell invasion and proliferation in cholangiocarcinoma.

Stretta radiofrequency treatment vs Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) using Toupet fundoplication (TF) and Stretta radiofrequency (SRF) have not been compared and this study was conducted to compare therapeutic efficacy of the two methods. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed a total of 230 patients undergoing TF or SRF at our hospital. Baseline data, reflux symptoms, the DeMeester scores, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and adverse events were compared over 1 year period. RESULTS: A total of 226 patients were included in the study. The time and frequency of reflux and percentage of reflux time before and 12 months after therapy were not significantly different. There were significantly interactions between the therapy method and follow-up time on the DeMeester score and LES pressure. Twelve months post therapy, the DeMeester score was significantly higher in SRF than in TF group, while the LES pressure was lower. At 12 months after therapy, multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis showed that reflux frequency, the DeMeester score and LES pressure were risk factors for poor prognosis in TF group, while reflux frequency and the DeMeester score, and LES pressure were risk factors for poor prognosis in SFR group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TF, SFR can significantly improve the esophageal pH and pressure in GERD patients without increasing the risk of poor prognosis.