Through the lens: A qualitative exploration of nurses' experiences of smart glasses in urgent care.

AIM: To investigate the real-world experiences of nurses' using smart glasses to triage patients in an urgent care centre. DESIGN: A parallel convergent mixed-method design. METHODS: We collected data through twelve in-depth interviews with nurses using the device and a survey. Recruitment continued until no new themes emerged. We coded the data using a deductive-thematic approach. Qualitative and survey data were coded and then mapped to the most dominant dimension of the sociotechnical framework. Both the qualitative and quantitative findings were triangulated within each dimension of the framework to gain a comprehensive understanding of user experiences. RESULTS: Overall, nurses were satisfied with using smart glasses in urgent care and would recommend them to others. Nurses rated the device highly on ease of use, facilitation of training and development, nursing empowerment and communication. Qualitatively, nurses generally felt the device improved workflows and saved staff time. Conversely, technological challenges limited its use, and users questioned its sustainability if inadequate staffing could not be resolved. CONCLUSION: Smart glasses enhanced urgent care practices by improving workflows, fostering staff communication, and empowering healthcare professionals, notably providing development opportunities for nurses. While smart glasses offered transformative benefits in the urgent care setting, challenges, including technological constraints and insufficient organisational support, were barriers to sustained integration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These real-world insights encompass both the benefits and challenges of smart glass utilisation in the context of urgent care. The findings will help inform greater workflow optimisation and future technological developments. Moreover, by sharing these experiences, other healthcare institutions looking to implement smart glass technology can learn from the successes and barriers encountered, facilitating smoother adoption, and maximising the potential benefits for patient care. REPORTING METHOD: COREQ checklist (consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Identifying Patients With Cirrhosis Who Might Avoid Screening Endoscopy Based on Serum Albumin and Bilirubin and Platelet Counts.

The presence of gastroesophageal varices is a major complication of portal hypertension associated with significant morbidity and mortality.1 The Baveno VI criteria state that patients with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) <20 kPa by transient elastography (TE) and platelet count >150,000/µL can avoid screening endoscopy for high-risk varix (HRV).2 However, because TE is not widely available, the Baveno VI criteria could not be applied in many clinical settings. As such, we aim to determine a concise clinical criterion as an alternative noninvasive tool to predict absence of HRV among patients with compensated cirrhosis to avoid screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).