Autosomal ring chromosomes in human genetic disorders.

Ring chromosomes arise following breakage and rejoining in both chromosome arms. They are heterogeneous with variable size and genetic content and can originate from any chromosome. Phenotypes associated with ring chromosomes are highly variable as apart from any deletion caused by ring formation, imbalances from ring instability can also occur. Of interest is ring chromosome 20 which has a significant association with epilepsy with seizure onset in early childhood. Severe growth deficiency without major malformations is a common finding in the ring chromosome carrier. This phenotype associated with ring behaviour and mitotic instability and independent of the chromosome involved has been termed the "ring syndrome". Precise genotype-phenotype correlations for ring chromosomes may not be possible as influencing factors vary depending on the extent of deletion in ring formation, ring instability and the level of mosaicism. Although ring chromosomes usually arise as de novo events, familial transmission of rings from carrier to offspring has been described and prenatal diagnosis for any pregnancies should always be considered.

Uniparental disomy in Robertsonian translocations: strategies for uniparental disomy testing.

Robertsonian translocations (ROBs) are whole arm rearrangements involving the acrocentric chromosomes 13-15 and 21-22 and carriers are at increased risk for aneuploidy and thus uniparental disomy (UPD). Chromosomes 14 and 15 are imprinted with expression of genes dependent on the parental origin of the chromosome. Correction of a trisomic or monosomic conceptus for chromosomes 14 or 15 would lead to one of the established UPD 14mat/pat or UPD 15 (Prader-Willi/Angelman) syndromes (PWS/AS). In view of this, prenatal UPD testing should be considered for balanced carriers of a ROB, fetuses with a familial or de novo balanced ROB that contains chromosome 14 or 15 or with a normal karyotype when a parent is a carrier of a balanced ROB with a 14 or 15. Individuals with congenital anomalies and an abnormal phenotype and carry a ROB involving the two imprinted chromosomes should also be UPD tested.

A comparison of molecular and cytogenetic techniques for the diagnosis of pregnancy loss.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, advantages, and limitations of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification compared with conventional karyotype analysis in the investigation of contributing factors to recurrent pregnancy loss. METHOD: A cohort of 284 patients underwent side-by-side analysis of products of conception by both conventional karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification with direct comparison of results. RESULTS: Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification was shown to enable a diagnosis for an additional 47 (16.5%) patients compared with conventional karyotype analysis. However, this advantage was offset by some disadvantages of the method, including a high false-positive rate (8/104; 7.7%), as demonstrated by single-arm probe abnormalities of uncertain clinical significance, as well as the inability to characterize structural rearrangements, such as Robertsonian translocations, which comprised 2.46% of samples (99% confidence interval = 0.09-4.83), and ploidy changes. The calculated performance characteristics of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in this cohort yielded a sensitivity of 86.9% and specificity of 92.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of now widely accepted molecular methodologies, such as lower failure rates, faster turnaround times, and lower cost, must be complemented by adequate counseling, family follow-up, and specific diagnostic reporting practices. It is particularly important to specifically address the important limitations of the methodology, including the inability to characterize balanced structural rearrangements and ploidy changes, especially if multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification is to be performed alone.