Inside-out versus outside-in transobturator tension-free vaginal tape: a 5-year prospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 1-year and 5-year outcomes of transobturator tension-free vaginal tape with outside-in and inside-out approaches in women with urinary stress incontinence, and to identify risk factors for treatment failure at 5 years. METHOD: A prospective observational study was carried out for women with urinary stress incontinence who underwent transobturator tension-free vaginal tape from September 2004 to March 2008 in a tertiary urogynecology center. Women (n = 213) had either an outside-in (n = 124) or inside-out (n = 89) procedure. They were followed up annually until 5 years after the operation. Subjective cure was defined as women not experiencing any urine loss on physical activity. Objective cure was defined as no urine leak at cough during a standard urodynamic study. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 59.2 months, the subjective cure rates were 81.7% and 84.1%; the objective cure rate were 82.6% and 82.5% for the outside-in and inside-out approach, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the procedures. De novo overactive bladder syndrome (10.6% in outside-in and 14.6% in inside-out approach; P = 0.40) and de novo detrusor overactivity (5.8% in outside-in and 15% in inside-out approach; P = 0.11) was also comparable between the two groups. Complications at the fifth year were low and not significantly different among both methods. CONCLUSION: The outside-in approach and inside-out approach are both safe and effective in treating women with urinary stress incontinence up to 5 years.

Symptoms, quality of life, and factors affecting women's treatment decisions regarding pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We performed an investigation of symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and factors affecting women's treatment choice of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Three hundred and eight women presenting with POP were assessed by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, and urodynamic studies. Treatment was arranged according to each woman's preference after counseling. Factors affecting treatment choice were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher exact test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, and logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS: Patients had high prevalence of urinary, prolapse, and bowel symptoms. Their QOL was impaired, with Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ) higher than the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ) score and lower SF-36 score compared with the population norm. Logistic regression analysis indicated that complication from vaginal pessary, urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), stage of prolapse, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI) scoring were factors for choosing surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Women with POP had great symptomatic distress and impaired QOL. Complication from vaginal pessary, USI, stage of prolapse, and POPDI scores were factors increasing the likelihood of the patient choosing surgical treatment.