Clinical characteristics of Graves / 中南大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVES@#A variety of causes can lead to cholestasis, however, cholestasis caused by Graves' disease is usually overlooked clinically. Here we analyze the clinical characteristics of Graves' disease associated cholestasis so as to have a better understanding for the disease.@*METHODS@#We retrospectively collected 13 inpatients' data who suffered from the Graves' disease associated cholestasis in the Department of Infectious Disease of Xiangya Hospital from January 2000 to December 2018. The characteristics of the patients' age, gender, liver function, thyroid function, coagulation function, the special cardiac examination, treatment, and follow-up data were analyzed.@*RESULTS@#Thirteen patients, including 10 males and 3 females with the age range from 33 to 55 (median 43) years old presented cholestasis, pruritus, and hypermetabolic symptoms. The levels of total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL), glutamic-pyruvic transferase, glutamic-oxaloacetic transferase, alkaline phosphosphatase, and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase were 170.4-976.7 (median 388.8) µmol/L, 93.2-418.1 (median 199.2) µmol/L, 25.1-182.1 (median 106.4) U/L, 38.2-265.7 (median 59.7) U/L, 105.3-332.0 (median 184.5) U/L, and 20.7-345.1 (median 47.6) U/L, respectively. The levels of free triiodothyronine (FT@*CONCLUSIONS@#Graves' disease can cause cholestasis, with the low incidence. The symptoms of cholestasis can be improved or even eradicated with the cure of the Graves' disease. The cholestasis may be idiopathic. For patients with cholestasis and hyperthyroidism, Graves' disease should be considered for differential diagnosis.

Virologic and clinical characteristics for prognosis of severe COVID-19: a retrospective observational study in Wuhan, China

BackgroundThe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has progressed to a pandemic associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The WHO and the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have issued interim clinical guidance for management of patients with confirmed coronavirus disease (COVID-19), but there is limited data on the virologic and clinical characteristics for prognosis of severe COVID-19. MethodsA total of 50 patients with severe COVID-19 were divided into good and poor recovery groups. The dynamic viral shedding and serological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 were explored. The risk factors associated with poor recovery and lung lesion resolutions were identified. In addition, the potential relationships among the viral shedding, the pro-inflammatory response, and lung lesion evolutions were characterized. ResultsA total of 58% of the patients had poor recovery and were more likely to have a prolonged interval of viral shedding. The longest viral shedding was 57 days after symptom onset. Older age, hyperlipemia, hypoproteinemia, corticosteroid therapy, consolidation on chest computed-tomography (CT), and prolonged SARS-CoV-2 IgM positive were all associated with poor recovery. Additionally, the odds of impaired lung lesion resolutions were higher in patients with hypoproteinemia, hyperlipemia, and elevated levels of IL-4 and ferritin. Finally, viral shedding and proinflammatory responses were closely correlated with lung lesion evolutions on chest CT. ConclusionsPatients with severe COVID-19 have prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection and delayed intermittent viral shedding. Older age, hyperlipemia, hypoproteinemia, corticosteroid usage, and prolonged SARS-CoV-2 IgM positive might be utilized as predicative factors for the patients with poor recovery.

Epidemiological parameters of coronavirus disease 2019: a pooled analysis of publicly reported individual data of 1155 cases from seven countries

BackgroundThe outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization, while several key epidemiological parameters of the disease remain to be clarified. This study aimed to obtain robust estimates of the incubation period, upper limit of latent period (interval between infectors exposure and infectees exposure), serial interval, time point of exposure (the day of infectees exposure to infector relative to the latters symptom onset date) and basic reproduction number (R0) of COVID-19. MethodsBetween late February and early March of 2020, the individual data of laboratory confirmed cases of COVID-19 were retrieved from 10728 publicly available reports released by the health authorities of and outside China and from 1790 publications identified in PubMed and CNKI. To be eligible, a report had to contain the data that allowed for estimation of at least one parameter. As relevant data mainly came from clustering cases, the clusters for which no evidence was available to establish transmission order were all excluded to ensure accuracy of estimates. Additionally, only the cases with an exposure period spanning 3 days or less were included in the estimation of parameters involving exposure date, and a simple method for determining exposure date was adopted to ensure the error of estimates be small (< 0.3 day). Depending on specific parameters, three or four of normal, lognormal, Weibull, and gamma distributions were fitted to the datasets and the results from appropriate models were presented. FindingsIn total, 1155 cases from China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Vietnam, Germany and Malaysia were included for the final analysis. The mean and standard deviation were 7.44 days and 4.39 days for incubation period, 2.52 days and 3.95 days for the upper limit of latent period, 6.70 days and 5.20 days for serial interval, and -0.19 day (i.e., 0.19 day before infectors symptom onset) and 3.32 days for time point of exposure. R0 was estimated to be 1.70 and 1.78 based on two different formulas. For 39 (6.64%) cases, the incubation periods were longer than 14 days. In 102 (43.78%) infector-infectee pairs, transmission occurred before infectors symptom onsets. In 27 (3.92%) infector-infectee pairs, infectees symptom onsets occurred before those of infectors. Stratified analysis showed that incubation period and serial interval were consistently longer for those with less severe disease and for those whose primary cases had less severe disease. Asymptomatic transmission was also observed. InterpretationThis study obtained robust estimates of several key epidemiological parameters of COVID-19. The findings support current practice of 14-day quarantine of persons with potential exposure, but also suggest that longer monitoring periods might be needed for selected groups. The estimates of serial interval, time point of exposure and latent period provide consistent evidence on pre-symptomatic transmission. This together with asymptomatic transmission and the generally longer incubation and serial interval of less severe cases suggests a high risk of long-term epidemic in the absence of appropriate control measures. FundingThis work received no funding from any source.

A meta-analysis of liver lesions in hepatitis B patients undergoing anti-tuberculosis therapy / 中华肝脏病杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the effect of different immune status on the incidence of hepatic lesions in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection undergoing anti-tuberculosis therapy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The PubMed (1966-2013), Embase (1966-2013), Wanfang (1998-2013), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI; 1997-2013), and Chinese Biomedical (CBMdisc; 1860-2013) literature databases were searched for case-control studies of hepatic lesions in patients undergoing anti-tuberculosis therapy with or without concomitant HBV infection. The HBV patients were divided into subgroups according to hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity or negativity, all members of the control group were HBsAg⁻. The data from all 7 studies included in the meta-analysis were extracted and analysed using RevMan5.2 soft-ware.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Patients with HBV infection who were undergoing anti-tuberculosis therapy had a higher risk factor than the control patients (OR =5.81, 95% CI =[4.26, 7.39]). The HBV patients with HBeAg positivity who were undergoing anti-tuberculosis therapy had a high risk factor than the HBV patients with HBeAg negativity (OR =2.56, 95% CI=[1.90, 3.44]).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>HBV infection is a risk factor for hepatic lesions when undergoing anti-tuberculosis therapy, and HBeAg-positive status may put a patient at higher risk.</p>

Prognostic value of procalcitonin, endotoxin and common inflammatory markers combining MELD score in patients with chronic severe hepatitis / 中南大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the mid-term prognostic value of procalcitonin (PCT), endotoxin and common inflammatory markers combining the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in patients with chronic severe hepatitis.@*METHODS@#A total of 124 chronic severe hepatitis patients were enrolled, who were hospitalized in the Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from May 2011 to December 2011. Indexes of inflammation, liver and kidney function tests and MELD were determined within 24 h after the admission, and blood samples were collected for measurement of endotoxin , procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactin protein (CRP). The outcome was confirmed after discharge follow-up at the end of the 3rd month. According to the outcome, the 124 patients were divided into a survival group (n=58) and a death group(n=66).@*RESULTS@#1) Of the 124 patients, 66 died and 58 survived, with statistical difference in age, MELD score, white blood cell (WBC), polymorphonuclear (PMN), CRP and PCT by single factor analysis between the 2 groups(P<0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that age, MELD scores and PCT were highly correlated with the outcome (OR=1.07, 1.42 and 1.02 respectively, P<0.05), which could be used to predict the 3 month mid-term mortality of chronic severe hepatitis. 2)There was significant correlation between the MELD scores and the mid-term mortality. Age was positively correlated with the MELD score, and Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.21 (P<0.05). PCT was also positively correlated with the MELD, and Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.54 (P<0.01). 3)According to the receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve analysis , the area under the curve (AUC) of MELD score and PCT were 0.91 and 0.77 respectively, higher than those of other indexes (P<0.01). When the MELD score was up to 30.09 or higher, the predicted mortality risk among these tested patients was the highest(82.26%). The mortality risk predicted by PCT combining MELD score and PCT alone was lower than by MELD score alone (75.00%), but the specificity of MELD score combining PCT was 100%, and the positive prediction value was 1.00.@*CONCLUSION@#Endotoxin and common inflammatory markers (WBC, PMN, and CRP) are not reliable indicators to predict the prognosis in patients with chronic-severe hepatitis. MELD score is significantly correlated with the outcome of mid-term chronic severe hepatitis, PCT and age are both positively correlated with the MELD score. PCT and age combining MELD score can be used to predict the 3 month mid-term mortality of chronic severe hepatitis. MELD score has better prognostic value than PCT. MELD score combining PCT can improve the specificity of prediction.