Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(3): 266-272, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093646

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Artificial nail materials are mixtures that are prone to contain several sensitizing (meth)acrylates. It is not known whether the listing of (meth)acrylates is correct in these products' packages. Protective gloves suited for nail work are needed. OBJECTIVES: To analyse (meth)acrylates in gel nail and acrylic nail products chemically and to compare the results with the information in the product labels, and to study penetration of artificial nail materials through selected disposable gloves. METHODS: We analysed 31 gel nail products and 6 acrylic nail products for their (meth)acrylate content by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). We tested the penetration of two nail products through three disposable gloves: nitrile rubber, neoprene rubber and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). RESULTS: Altogether 32/37 products contained (meth)acrylates. In all of them, there was discrepancy between the listed (meth)acrylates and those discovered in the analysis. The commonest (meth)acrylates were hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA, 20/37 samples) and hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA, 9/37 samples), but many of the product packages failed to declare them. Isobornyl acrylate (IBA) was discovered in nine gel nail products. The neoprene glove could withstand nail gel for 20 min and thin nitrile glove and PVC glove for 5 min. Acrylic nail liquid penetrated through disposable gloves quickly. CONCLUSIONS: Labelling of artificial nail products was notably incorrect on most products. Requirements for product labelling must be updated so that the risk of sensitization associated with artificial nail products is clearly indicated. Disposable gloves can probably be used short-term in gel nail work, whereas disposable gloves do not protect the user from acrylic nail liquids.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Humanos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Unhas , Neopreno/efeitos adversos , Borracha/efeitos adversos , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Acrilatos/efeitos adversos , Metacrilatos , Nitrilas
3.
Toxics ; 11(3)2023 Feb 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36976995

RESUMO

Diisocyanates are a group of chemicals widely used in different industrial applications. The critical health effects related to diisocyanate exposure are isocyanate sensitisation, occupational asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Industrial air measurements and human biomonitoring (HBM) samples were gathered in specific occupational sectors to examine MDI, TDI, HDI and IPDI and the respective metabolites from Finnish screening studies. HBM data can give a more accurate picture of diisocyanate exposure, especially if workers have been exposed dermally or used respiratory protection. The HBM data were used for conducting a health impact assessment (HIA) in specific Finnish occupational sectors. For this purpose, exposure reconstruction was performed on the basis of HBM measurements of TDI and MDI exposures using a PBPK model, and a correlation equation was made for HDI exposure. Subsequently, the exposure estimates were compared to a previously published dose-response curve for excess BHR risk. The results showed that the mean and median diisocyanate exposure levels and HBM concentrations were low for all diisocyanates. In HIA, the excess risk of BHR from MDI exposure over a working life period was highest in the construction and motor and vehicle industries and repair sectors, resulting in estimated excess risks of BHR of 2.0% and 2.6%, and 113 and 244 extra BHR cases in Finland, respectively. Occupational exposure to diisocyanates must be monitored because a clear threshold for DI sensitisation cannot be established.

4.
Contact Dermatitis ; 87(1): 81-88, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35293005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The practical importance of two recently described epoxy hardener allergens-1,3-benzenedimethanamine, N-(2-phenylethyl) derivatives (1,3-BDMA-D) and hydrogenated formaldehyde benzenamine polymer (FBAP)-as occupational allergens remains to be defined. OBJECTIVES: To describe patients diagnosed at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) with positive reactions to 1,3-BDMA-D or FBAP. METHODS: We searched FIOH's patch-test files from January 2017 to December 2020 for patients examined due to suspected occupational contact allergy to epoxy compounds. We analyzed the patch-test results and sources of exposure to various epoxy hardeners and focused on occupations, symptoms, and the sources of exposure to 1,3-BDMA-D and FBAP. RESULTS: During the study period, 102 patients were examined at FIOH for suspected occupational contact allergy to epoxy compounds. Of these, 19 (19%) were diagnosed with contact allergy to 1,3-BDMA-D (n = 10) or FBAP (n = 12). The largest occupational group was sewage pipe reliners (n = 8). Seven different hardener products contained FBAP, whereas 1,3-BDMA-D was present in only one hardener used by spray painters. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients with suspected occupational epoxy resin system allergy tested positive to in-house test substances of 1,3-BDMA-D and/or FBAP.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Compostos de Epóxi/efeitos adversos , Resinas Epóxi/efeitos adversos , Formaldeído/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro , Polímeros
5.
Occup Environ Med ; 78(11): 793-800, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33790028

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Exposures leading to irritant-induced asthma (IIA) are poorly documented. METHODS: We retrospectively screened the medical records of patients with IIA diagnosed in an occupational medicine clinic during 2000-2018. We classified the cases into acute (onset after single exposure) and subacute (onset after multiple exposures) IIA. We analysed in detail, occupations, causative agents and their air levels in the workplace, exposure events and the root causes of high exposure. RESULTS: Altogether 69 patients were diagnosed with IIA, 30 with acute and 39 with subacute IIA. The most common occupational groups were industrial operators (n=23, 33%), metal and machinery workers (n=16, 11%) and construction workers (n=12, 8%). Among industrial operators significantly more cases had subacute IIA than acute IIA (p=0.002). Forty cases (57%) were attributable to some type of corrosive acidic or alkaline chemical. Acute IIA followed accidents at work in different types of occupation, while subacute IIA was typical among industrial operators performing their normal work tasks under poor work hygiene conditions. The most common root cause was lack of information or false guidance in acute IIA (n=11, 36%) and neglect of workplace hygiene measures in subacute IIA (n=29, 74%). CONCLUSIONS: Accidents are the main causes of acute IIA, whereas subacute IIA can develop in normal work in risk trades with poor work hygiene. Airborne strong acids or bases seem to be the most important causative agents of acute and subacute IIA. The different risk profiles of acute and subacute IIA should be considered in the prevention and identification of the cases.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Irritantes/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Acidentes de Trabalho , Adulto , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Indústria da Construção , Feminino , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Instalações Industriais e de Manufatura , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32204423

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to assess occupational exposure to diisononyl phthalate (DiNP) and di(2-propylheptyl) phthalate (DPHP] in Finland. Four companies took part in the research project: A cable factory, a plastic producing company, a producer of coated textiles, and a tarpaulin producer. The cable factory used DPHP (and occasionally also diisodecyl phthalate, DiDP), the plastic producing company used both DPHP and DiNP, and the latter two companies used DiNP in their production. Exposure was assessed by measuring phthalate metabolites in urine samples (biomonitoring) and by performing air measurements. Low-level occupational exposure to DiNP was observed in the company that produced coated textiles-out of eight workers, one extruder operator was exposed to DiNP at levels exceeding the non-occupationally exposed population background levels. Some workers in the cable factory and the plastics producing company were occupationally exposed to DPHP. Air levels of phthalates were generally low, mostly below the limit of quantification. All phthalate metabolite concentrations were, however, well below the calculated biomonitoring equivalents, which suggests that the health risks related to the exposure are low.


Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional , Ácidos Ftálicos , Exposição Ambiental , Finlândia , Humanos , Ácidos Ftálicos/análise , Ácidos Ftálicos/toxicidade , Risco , Indústria Têxtil
7.
Toxicol Lett ; 298: 125-133, 2018 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29596886

RESUMO

Resorcinol is a suspected endocrine disruptor that affects thyroid function by inhibiting thyroxin peroxidase. It may also have an impact on iodine uptake. Resorcinol has various uses; for example in the manufacture of rubber products and in wood adhesives, flame retardants, UV stabilizers, and dyes. It is also used in personal care products such as hair colorants, anti-acne preparations, and peels. The aim of this study was to assess both environmental background exposure and occupational exposure to resorcinol in Finland. We investigated occupational exposure in hairdresser work and in the manufacture of tyres, adhesive resins and glue-laminated timber by biomonitoring total resorcinol concentration in urine samples. The biomonitoring results were compared to the urinary levels of occupationally non-exposed volunteers, and to the biomonitoring equivalent (BE), which we estimated on the basis of the EFSA's acceptable daily intake (ADI) value for resorcinol. Almost all the urine samples (99%) of the non-occupationally exposed volunteers contained measurable amounts of resorcinol. The urinary resorcinol data were rather scattered, and the resorcinol concentrations among women (GM 84 µg/l, 95th percentile 2072 µg/l) were clearly higher than the respective concentrations among men (GM 35 µg/l, 95th percentile 587 µg/l). The reason for this difference remains unclear. Although the two highest results exceeded the BE of 4 mg/l calculated on the basis of the EFSA's ADI, the 95th percentile of the occupationally non-exposed volunteers' results remained well below the BE among both males and females. According to the results, hairdressers' exposure to resorcinol was at the same level as that of the reference population of occupationally non-exposed volunteers. All hairdresser's values remained below the BE for resorcinol. The urinary resorcinol levels of the industrial workers were also at the same level as those of the reference population. We observed slight increases in the post-shift and evening samples of those working in the manufacture of tyres and adhesive resins. The results of some workers in the tyre manufacturing company exceeded the 95th percentile of non-occupationally exposed males, which was used as a biological guidance value for occupational exposure. Moreover, in this case exposure was below the health-based biomonitoring equivalents. All the air samples collected in the companies contained very low resorcinol concentrations. It should be noted that the sample sizes for the male controls and industrial groups were small.


Assuntos
Disruptores Endócrinos/urina , Exposição Ambiental , Saúde Ocupacional , Resorcinóis/urina , Adulto , Idoso , Indústria da Beleza , Disruptores Endócrinos/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Feminino , Finlândia , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Indústria Manufatureira , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resorcinóis/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Urinálise , Adulto Jovem
8.
Occup Environ Med ; 75(4): 277-282, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29175989

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: 3-(Bromomethyl)-2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-benzoic acid (BCMBA) has not previously been identified as a respiratory sensitiser. We detected two cases who presented respiratory and urticaria symptoms related to BCMBA and had positive skin prick tests to the agent. Subsequently, we conducted outbreak investigations at the BCMBA-producing factory and performed clinical examinations to confirm occupational diseases. METHODS: The outbreak investigations included observations of work processes, assessment of exposure, a medical survey with a questionnaire and skin prick tests with 0.5% BCMBA water solution on 85 exposed workers and 9 unexposed workers. We used specific inhalation or nasal challenge and open skin application test to investigate BCMBA-related occupational asthma, rhinitis and contact urticaria. RESULTS: We identified nine workers with respiratory and/or skin symptoms and positive skin prick tests to BCMBA in a chemical factory. A survey among chemical factory workers indicated a BCMBA-related sensitisation rate of 8% among all exposed workers; the rate was highest (25%) among production workers in the production hall. Sensitisation was detected only in workers with the estimated highest exposure levels. Six cases of occupational asthma, rhinitis and/or contact urticaria caused by BCMBA were confirmed with challenge tests. Asthma-provoking doses in specific inhalation challenges were very low (0.03% or 0.3% BCMBA in lactose). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a new low molecular weight agent causing occupational asthma, rhinitis and contact urticaria. A typical clinical picture of allergic diseases and positive skin prick tests suggest underlying IgE-mediated disease mechanisms. Stringent exposure control measures are needed in order to prevent BCMBA-related diseases.


Assuntos
Asma/induzido quimicamente , Benzoatos/efeitos adversos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Rinite/induzido quimicamente , Urticária/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Benzoatos/química , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Cutâneos , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 61(1): 44-55, 2017 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28395312

RESUMO

The aim of the study was to assess occupational exposure to bisphenol A in Finland. Five companies took part in the research project: two paint factories (liquid and powder paints), a composite product factory, a thermal paper factory, and a tractor factory. Exposure was assessed by measuring total bisphenol A excretion (free and conjugated) from urine samples, and its concentrations in the air. The results revealed the specific work tasks in two of five companies in which significant occupational exposure to bisphenol A may occur. In the manufacturing of liquid paint hardener, urine samples collected after the working day showed bisphenol A levels of up to 100-170 µg l-1. Workers in thermal paper manufacturing were also exposed to bisphenol A, especially those working in the manufacture of coating material and operating coating machines. Median concentrations of the post-shift urine samples of coating machine workers were in the range of 130-250 µg l-1. The highest bisphenol A concentrations were in the range of 1000-1500 µg l-1. Recommendations for more effective personal protection resulted in decreased exposure, particularly among coating machine operators. In the rest of the companies, urinary bisphenol A levels were typically in the range of those of the general population. Bisphenol A concentrations in air samples were typically low (<40 µg m-3), except in some short-term duties related to the handling of solid bisphenol A (maximum 17.6 mg m-3). Low air levels, even in the companies with high urinary levels, suggest exposure via dermal contact. According to the results, exposure to bisphenol A may occur particularly in work tasks that involve the use of pure bisphenol A. In these tasks, special attention should be paid to the prevention of skin exposure. Inhalation exposure may become relevant in dusty work tasks. Since skin exposure is of potential concern in these tasks, biomonitoring is recommended as the method for assessing occupational exposure to bisphenol A.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Compostos Benzidrílicos/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Fenóis/análise , Adulto , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/urina , Poeira/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Feminino , Finlândia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Pintura/análise , Papel , Fatores de Tempo
10.
Toxicol Lett ; 232(3): 595-600, 2015 Feb 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25542146

RESUMO

The causal relationship between inhalation exposure to methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and the risk of occupational asthma is well known, but the role of dermal exposure and dermal uptake of MDI in this process is still unclear. The aims of this study were to measure dermal exposure to and the dermal uptake of MDI among workers (n=24) who regularly handle MDI-urethanes. Dermal exposure was measured by the tape-strip technique from four sites on the dominant hand and arm. The workers with the highest exposure (n=5) were biomonitored immediately after their work shift, in the evening and the next morning, using urinary 4,4´methylenedianiline (MDA) as a marker. Dermal uptake was evaluated by comparing workers' MDA excretions both when they were equipped with respiratory protective devices (RPDs) and when they did not use them. The measured amounts of MDI on their hands varied from below 0.1 to 17 µg/10 cm(2) during the test. MDI concentrations were in the range of 0.08 to 27 µg m(-3) in the breathing zone outside the RPDs. MDA concentrations varied from 0.1 to 0.2 µmol mol(-1) creatinine during the test period. The decreasing effect of RPDs on inhalation exposure was absent in the next morning urine samples; this excretion pattern might be an indication of dermal uptake of MDI.


Assuntos
Monitoramento Ambiental , Isocianatos/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional , Absorção Cutânea/fisiologia , Poluentes Ambientais , Luvas Protetoras , Humanos , Isocianatos/administração & dosagem
11.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 58(7): 921-30, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24936578

RESUMO

Diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) is a sensitizing chemical that can cause allergic contact dermatitis and asthma. Protective gloves and clothing are necessary to prevent skin exposure. Breakthrough times are used for the selection of chemical protective gloves and clothing. In the EN 374-3:2003 European standard, breakthrough time is defined as the time in which the permeation reaches the rate of 1.0 µg min(-1) cm(-2) through the material. Such breakthrough times do not necessarily represent safe limits for sensitizing chemicals. We studied the permeation of 4,4'-MDI through eight glove materials and one clothing material. The test method was derived from the EN 374-3 and ASTM F 739 standards. All measured permeation rates were below 0.1 µg min(-1) cm(-2), and thus, the breakthrough times for all the tested materials were over 480min, when the definitions of EN 374-3 and ASTM F 739 for the breakthrough time were used. Based on the sensitizing capacity of MDI, we concluded that a cumulative permeation of 1.0 µg cm(-2) should be used as the end point of the breakthrough time determination for materials used for protection against direct contact with MDI. Using this criterion for the breakthrough time, seven tested materials were permeated in <480min (range: 23-406min). Affordable chemical protective glove materials that had a breakthrough time of over 75min were natural rubber, thick polyvinylchloride, neoprene-natural rubber, and thin and thick nitrile rubber. We suggest that the current definitions of breakthrough times in the standard requirements for protective materials should be critically evaluated as regards MDI and other sensitizing chemicals, or chemicals highly toxic via the skin.


Assuntos
Luvas Protetoras , Isocianatos , Teste de Materiais/métodos , Roupa de Proteção , Isocianatos/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Permeabilidade , Roupa de Proteção/normas , Borracha
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...