Manipulation under Anesthesia Following TKA with Persona IQ: A Case Series.

Introduction: Although surgical devices and techniques continue to improve, regular post-operative monitoring of patients is required to ensure the best outcomes. New technological advances have allowed physicians to monitor the daily recovery of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. This report is the first to describe the utilization of an implantable gait monitoring device and its capacity to detect poor early post-operative outcomes. Case Report: Two patients, a 78-year-old male and a 34-year-old female, were assessed post-TKA utilizing remote gait kinematics and clinical evaluations and determined to need manipulation under anesthesia due to severely limited range of motion. One patient, a 51-year-old female, with good clinical outcomes, was used for comparison. Conclusion: Remote monitoring may provide an earlier indication than clinical evaluations in identification of TKA patients at risk of poor outcomes and may who need intervention. The use of remote kinematic gait data in earlier identification of patients at risk has the potential to help improve outcomes for the broader population of TKA patients.

Delayed Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Identified by Remote Monitoring With Tibial Extension Sensors.

Remote monitoring of patient activity following total knee arthroplasty has grown in popularity over the past decade. Recent technological advances have allowed for implantation of accelerometry devices within the tibial stem for remote monitoring of mobility postoperatively. Remote monitoring is suggested to allow for intervention in the case of events that may occur outside of regular follow-up appointments or traditional patient questionnaires. This report details the ability of an implanted tibial sensor to continuously collect objective mobility data allowing the orthopaedic surgeon to intervene beyond the standard 90-day episode of care.

Patient reported outcomes do not correlate to functional knee recovery and range of motion in total knee arthroplasty.

Background: Many total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients exhibit continued pain and limited function following surgery. Determining TKA outcomes is typically reliant on post-operative evaluations and completing patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Due to low compliance rates, it is essential to identify new strategies for monitoring patients. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the correlations between gait kinematics, PROMs, and knee range of motion (ROM). Methods: 130 patients (75 female) received Persona IQ TKA (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) which includes a stem extension with embedded accelerometer and gyroscope. PROM scores were compared at baseline and 6 weeks post-TKA using a paired t-test. Gait kinematics were recorded daily via the Persona IQ stem extension. Pearson's correlation coefficients were derived between PROMs and average gait kinematics. Results: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS Jr.) and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical scores improved following surgery (p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). Weak statistically significant correlations were found between PROMS and gait kinematics. Conclusion: Weak correlations between PROMs and gait kinematics indicate patient perception of improvement and objectively measured functional status may not be interchangeable. Further, compliance with Persona IQ data reached 95.4-97.7% (depending on the parameter) at 6 weeks following surgery, a 20% higher compliance rate over PROMs. Daily functional measurements provide insight into the patient's progression and may be useful in detecting poor outcomes.

Altered biomechanics in bilateral total knee replacement patients during stair negotiation.

BACKGROUND: Many total knee replacement (TKR) patients need to have a contralateral knee replacement. Biomechanical differences between first and second replaced limbs of bilateral TKR have not been examined during stair negotiation. Additionally, it is unknown whether hip and ankle biomechanics of bilateral patients are altered. We examined hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics of first and second replaced limbs bilateral patients, as well as replaced and non-replaced limbs of unilateral patients, during stair ascent and descent. METHODS: Eleven bilateral TKR patients (70.09 ± 5.41 years, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 91.78 ± 13.00 kg) and 15 unilateral TKR patients (64.93 ± 5.11 years, 1.75 ± 0.09 m, 89.18 ± 17.55 kg) were recruited. Patients performed three to five trials of stair ascent and descent. The second step, during ascent, was the step of interest when analyzing each limb. A 2 × 2 (limb × group) analysis of variance was performed to determine differences between limbs and groups. RESULTS: During ascent, bilateral patients exhibited decreased peak loading-response knee extension (KEM) and push-off plantarflexion moments. Unilateral replaced limb KEM was lower than non-replaced limbs. During descent, bilateral patients descended the staircase significantly slower, had lower peak loading-response vertical ground reaction force and KEM, and push-off KEM. Bilateral patients had higher peak loading-response hip extension and push-off plantarflexion moments, and increased knee adduction ROM, compared with unilateral TKA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral patients exhibited similar hip, knee, and ankle joint moments between first and second replaced limbs. Substantial differences in hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics during stair negotiation in bilateral patients compared with unilateral patients may indicate a more complex adaptation strategy present in these patients.

Principal Component Analysis of Knee Joint Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Total Knee Replacement Patients During Level Walking.

Many unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) patients will need a contralateral TKR. Differences in knee joint biomechanics between bilateral patients and unilateral patients are not well established. The purpose of this study was to examine knee joint differences in level walking between bilateral and unilateral patients, and asymptomatic controls, using principal component analysis. Knee joints of 1st replaced limbs of 15 bilateral patients (69.40 ± 5.04 years), 15 replaced limbs of unilateral patients (66.47 ± 6.15 years), and 15 asymptomatic controls (63.53 ± 9.50 years) were analyzed during level walking. Principal component analysis examined knee joint sagittal- and frontal-plane kinematics and moments, and vertical ground reaction force (GRF). A one-way analysis of variance analyzed differences between principal component scores of each group. TKR patients exhibited more flexed and abducted knees throughout stance, decreased sagittal knee range of motion (ROM), increased early-stance adduction ROM, decreased loading-response knee extension and push-off knee flexion moments, decreased loading-response and push-off peak knee abduction moment (KAbM), increased KAbM at midstance, increased midstance vertical GRF, and decreased loading-response and push-off vertical GRF. Additionally, bilateral patients exhibited reduced sagittal knee ROM, increased adduction ROM, decreased sagittal knee moments throughout stance, decreased KAbM throughout stance, an earlier loading-response peak vertical GRF, and a decreased push-off vertical GRF, compared to unilateral patients. TKR patients, especially bilateral patients had stiff knee motion in the sagittal-plane, increased frontal-plane joint laxity, and a quadriceps avoidance gait.

Wide step width reduces knee abduction moment of obese adults during stair negotiation.

PURPOSE: An increased likelihood of developing obesity-related knee osteoarthritis may be associated with increased peak internal knee abduction moments (KAbM). Increases in step width (SW) may act to reduce this moment. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of increased SW on knee biomechanics during stair negotiation of healthy-weight and obese participants. METHODS: Participants (24: 10 obese and 14 healthy-weight) used stairs and walked over level ground while walking at their preferred speed in two different SW conditions - preferred and wide (200% preferred). A 2 × 2 (group × condition) mixed model analysis of variance was performed to analyze differences between groups and conditions (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Increased SW increased the loading-response peak knee extension moment during descent and level gait, decreased loading-response KAbMs, knee extension and abduction range of motion (ROM) during ascent, and knee adduction ROM during descent. Increased SW increased loading-response peak mediolateral ground reaction force (GRF), increased peak knee abduction angle during ascent, and decreased peak knee adduction angle during descent and level gait. Obese participants experienced disproportionate changes in loading-response mediolateral GRF, KAbM and peak adduction angle during level walking, and peak knee abduction angle and ROM during ascent. CONCLUSION: Increased SW successfully decreased loading-response peak KAbM. Implications of this finding are that increased SW may decrease medial compartment knee joint loading, decreasing pain and reducing joint deterioration. Increased SW influenced obese and healthy-weight participants differently and should be investigated further.