Preventive effect of irsogladine or omeprazole on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced esophagitis, peptic ulcers, and small intestinal lesions in humans, a prospective randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitors such as omeprazole are a standard treatment to prevent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal mucosal injuries. However, it is unclear which drugs may protect against all NSAID-induced digestive-tract injuries. Here, we compare the efficacy of the gastromucoprotective drug irsogladine with omeprazole in preventing NSAID-induced esophagitis, peptic ulcers, and small-intestinal mucosal injury in healthy subjects. METHODS: Thirty-two healthy volunteers were assigned to an irsogladine group (Group I; n = 16) receiving diclofenac sodium 75 mg and irsogladine 4 mg daily for 14 days, or an omeprazole group (Group O; n = 16) receiving diclofenac sodium 75 mg and omeprazole 10 mg daily for 14 days. Esophagitis and peptic ulcers were evaluated by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and small-intestinal injuries by capsule endoscopy, fecal calprotectin, and fecal occult blood before and after treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between Group I and Group O with respect to the change in lesion score in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum before and after treatment.NSAID treatment significantly increased the number of small intestinal mucosal breaks per subject by capsule endoscopic evaluation, from a basal level of 0.1 ± 0.3 up to 1.9 ± 2.0 lesions in Group O (p = 0.0002). In contrast, there were no significant changes in the mean number of mucosal breaks before and after co-treatment in Group I (0.3 ± 0.8 to 0.5 ± 0.7, p = 0.62), and the between-group difference was significant (p = 0.0040). Fecal calprotectin concentration, when the concentration before treatment was defined as 1, was significantly increased both in Group O (from 1.0 ± 0.0 to 18.1 ± 37.1, p = 0.0002) and Group I (from 1.0 ± 0.0 to 6.0 ± 11.1, p = 0.0280); the degree of increase in Group O was significantly higher compared with that in Group I (p<0.05). In addition, fecal occult blood levels increased significantly in Group O (p = 0.0018), but there was no change in Group I (p = 1.0), and the between-group difference was significant (p = 0.0031). CONCLUSION: Irsogladine protected against NSAID-induced mucosal injuries throughout the gastrointestinal tract, from esophagus to small intestine, significantly better than omeprazole. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (Registry ID number; UMIN000008114).

Strategies for peptic ulcer healing after 1 week proton pump inhibitor-based triple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Japanese patients: differences of gastric ulcers and duodenal ulcers.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy alone is insufficient to ensure healing of large ulcers with H. pylori-positive gastric ulcer (GU). The question of what is the optimum antiulcer treatment following H. pylori eradication therapy has not been fully elucidated. Furthermore, the ulcer healing effects of eradication therapy itself with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer (DU) have not been investigated. In GU study, the eradication therapy + proton pump inhibitor (PPI) group (group A) were administered eradication therapy followed by 7 weeks of a PPI, and the eradication therapy + gastroprotective drug (GP) group (group B) eradication therapy followed by 7 weeks of a GP. In DU study, the eradication therapy + PPI group (group C) were administered eradication therapy followed by 5 weeks of a PPI, and the eradication therapy only group (group D) was eradication therapy alone. In GU study, healing rates for ulcer of ≥15 mm in diameter were significant greater in the group A. In DU study, high healing rates were seen both the group C and D. In conclusion, a PPI could significantly heal GU than a GP after eradication therapy in GU. Meanwhile, the eradication alone is sufficient for DU.

Utility and problems of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is reported to be a safe and reliable procedure for the elderly, but these reports could have already had a bias at the time ESD was performed. However, the reports have not clearly stated the criteria of indications. In the present study, we retrospectively elucidated the usefulness and problems of ESD for early gastric cancer in elderly patients (≥ 65 years) in comparison with non-elderly patients. METHODS: The subjects were selected from 412 consecutive patients with early gastric cancer (515 lesions) for which ESD was performed between June 2002 and February 2010. The following were used for analysis between groups: pre- and postoperative performance status (PS) of subjects, prevalence rates of pre-existing comorbidities, characteristics of lesions, treatment outcomes, durations of hospitalization, operating times, incidence rates of complications and durations of hospitalization, and postoperative hemorrhage rates, and duration of hospitalization in patients with anticoagulant therapy. RESULTS: Of the lesions in the elderly, four patients (1.0%) were elderly with a PS of 3. The PS increased to six patients (1.6%) after the procedure. None of the non-elderly had a PS of 3 before or after the procedure. The ratio of patients with a pre-existing comorbidity was higher in the elderly than in the non-elderly. There were no differences between the two groups in the characteristics of the lesions, their duration of hospitalization, their operating times, or the incidence rates of complications. However, the elderly with perforations had a significantly longer hospitalization than the comparable non-elderly. The percentage of the patients taking anticoagulant drugs was significantly higher among the elderly. Of the patients on anticoagulant therapy, the duration of hospitalization tended to be longer in the elderly but no significant difference was found. None of the non-elderly with postoperative hemorrhage had received anticoagulant therapy. In the elderly with postoperative hemorrhage, 15.8% of the lesions were in those who had received anticoagulant therapy, indicating a significantly higher percentage of such lesions in the elderly group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ESD is useful in elderly patients because there is a similar risk as for the non-elderly if the approach is individualized, and the following are taken into consideration when making the final decision of performing ESD in an elderly patient: patients should have a PS of 0, 1, or 2; determine whether or not anticoagulant therapy can be discontinued and whether or not treatment can be performed reliably without complications.

[Prevention and treatment of NSAIDs-induced small intestinal lesions].

Recently, the serious problem of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs)-induced small intestinal damage has become a topic of great interest to gastroenterologists, since capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy are available for the detection of small intestinal lesions. We found some of mucoprotective agents, PPIs and H2-blockers prevented NSAIDs-induced small intestinal lesions in rat. The clinical trials suggested that some of mucoprotective agents and prostaglandin analog, not acid suppressants inhibited small intestinal lesions in healthy volunteers. Considering the cost benefit and the load of patients, we hope that one drug can prevent NSAIDs-induced lesions from esophagus to small intestines. We should use mucoprotective drugs well for these diseases.

[The role of prostaglandin derivatives in a treatment and prevention for gastric ulcers in the aged patients].

Prostaglandins play important roles in the gastric mucosal protection and gastric ulcer healing. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including aspirin are widely used for the aged patients. Administration of the prostaglandin derivatives has been proven to be effective for both prevention and treatment of gastric ulcers associated with NSAIDs, and prostaglandin derivatives are recommended for NSAIDs-induced gastric ulcers by the Japanese guidelines. The important side effects include abdominal pain, flatulence, and diarrhea. Recent advances in diagnostic methods including video capsule endoscopy and balloon endoscopy have enabled us to examine the entire small intestine, and we recognize that prevalence of small intestinal damage in patients taking NSAIDs is high. Prostaglandin derivatives are also useful for these small intestinal damages.

R-etodolac induces E-cadherin and suppresses colitis-related mouse colon tumorigenesis.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most serious complications of ulcerative colitis (UC), and the risk of UC-associated neoplasia increases as the region and duration of the disease increase. Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors effectively diminish carcinogenesis in a murine UC model. However, this may exacerbate colitis. The selective COX-2 inhibitor etodolac is marketed as a racemic mixture of the R- and S-enantiomers. The biochemical and pharmacological effects of etodolac are caused by the S-enantiomer, while the R-enantiomer lacks COX-inhibitory activity. In this study, we evaluated the effect of R-etodolac on colitis-related mouse colon tumorigenesis. The mice received 1,2-dimethlhydrazine (DMH), and then chronic colitis was induced by administration of two cycles of DSS (each cycle: 3% DSS for 7 days followed by distilled water for 14 days). The mice were sacrificed 28 days after the completion of both cycles. Mice were divided into the following groups: group A served as a disease control; group B received a low (2-mg/kg) dose of R-etodolac every 3 days during the entire period; group C received a high (10-mg/kg) dose of R-etodolac on the same schedule as group B; and group D served as a normal control. Administration of R-etodolac decreased the disease activity index during the DSS administration cycle. The mean number of tumors was 17.8, 15.2, 6.0, and 0 in groups A-D, respectively. In group C, R-etodolac significantly suppressed the occurrence of neoplasia (p<0.05). Although R-etodolac treatment did not affect COX-2 expression, it significantly enhanced expression of E-cadherin in both neoplastic lesions and background mucosa (i.e., lesion-free colon). Thus, administration of R-etodolac exerts a suppressive effect on the development of neoplasia in a murine model of DSS-induced colitis without exacerbation of the colitis. These results suggest that R-etodolac could be useful in the prevention of UC-associated neoplasia.

Protective effect of roxatidine against indomethacin-induced small intestinal mucosal injury in rats.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most significant causative factors of gastroduodenal ulcers. Recent reports have demonstrated that NSAIDs can also frequently induce ulceration and erosions of the small intestine. The aim of this study was to examine whether or not roxatidine (an H(2) receptor antagonist), which is known to increase gastric mucus in addition to inhibiting gastric acid, might suppress indomethacin-induced small intestinal mucosal injury, through an increase in mucus in rats. METHODS: Rats were given two p.o. doses of roxatidine, famotidine or cimetidine before and after the s.c. indomethacin injection. The injured area of the small intestine was analyzed. To examine effects of drugs on small intestinal mucus, rats were also given two p.o. doses of roxatidine, famotidine or cimetidine, and the ratio of the periodic acid Schiff (PAS)-positive area to the area of the mucosa in the small intestine was analyzed. In addition, we evaluated the involvement of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins (PG) in the effect of roxatidine on small intestinal mucus. RESULTS: Roxatidine significantly ameliorated indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury and increased the PAS-stained areas in the small intestinal mucosa, while cimetidine and famotidine had no significant effect. Pretreatment with N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester but not with indomethacin, suppressed the effect of roxatidine on small intestinal mucus, suggesting that the effect is mediated by endogenous NO but not by PG. CONCLUSION: Roxatidine suppressed indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury in rats. One possible mechanism is an increase of small intestinal mucus, mediated by NO.

Risk management for gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients: questionnaire for patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.

More elderly patients now undergo gastrointestinal endoscopy following recent advances in endoscopic techniques. In this study, we conducted a high-risk survey of endoscopies in Japan, using a questionnaire administered prior to upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy (UGITE), and identified anticholinergic agents and glucagon preparations as high-risk premedication. We also evaluated the cardiovascular effects of anticholinergic agents and glucagon through measurements of plasma levels of human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP) and human brain natriuretic peptide (hBNP). The subjects were 1480 patients who underwent UGITE. Nurses administered a pre-endoscopy questionnaire, questioning subjects regarding heart disease, hypertension, glaucoma, and urinary difficulties as risk factors for anticholinergic agents, and Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for glucagon preparations. Evaluation of subjects divided into under 65 and over 65 age groups revealed that in subjects aged 65 and over, risk factors for anticholinergic agents were significantly more high than those for glucagon. Analysis of the cardiovascular effects of anticholinergic agents and glucagon, in the elderly patients showed that hANP levels were significantly higher following administration of anticholinergic agents, but the change was not significant for glucagon premedication. Taking a detailed history before UGITE with the aid of a questionnaire at the same time as informed consent is obtained, is extremely useful in terms of risk management and selection of the appropriate premedication.

Significance of chymase-dependent matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation on indomethacin-induced small intestinal damages in rats.

The side effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) include gastrointestinal damage not only in the stomach but also in the small intestine. Chymase converts promatrix metalloproteinase-9 to matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, which plays an important role in NSAID-induced gastric damage, but it has been unclear whether chymase-dependent MMP-9 activation is involved in the NSAID-induced small intestinal damage. To clarify the involvement of chymase-dependent MMP-9 activation on NSAID-induced small intestinal damage, the effect of a chymase inhibitor, 2-[4-(5-fluoro-3-methylbenzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)sulfonamido-3-methanesulfonylphenyl] thiazole-4-carboxylic acid (TY-51469), on indomethacin-induced small intestinal damage in rats was evaluated. Until 6 h after oral administration of indomethacin in rats, intestinal MMP-9 activity was unchanged compared with normal rats, but significant increases in MMP-9 activity were observed 12 and 24 h after indomethacin administration. Significant increases in the small intestinal damage score were also observed 12 and 24 h after indomethacin administration. In the extract from the small intestine 24 h after indomethacin administration, the MMP-9 activation was significantly attenuated by TY-51469. Intraperitoneal injection of TY-51469 (10 mg/kg) 3 h before indomethacin administration significantly attenuated the MMP-9 activity in the small intestine compared with placebo treatment. Myeloperoxidase activity, which indicates accumulation of neutrophils, was significantly increased in the small intestine in the placebo-treated rats, but its activity was significantly attenuated by TY-51469 treatment. The area of small intestinal damage was also significantly ameliorated by TY-51469 treatment. These findings suggest that chymase-dependent MMP-9 activation has a significant role in indomethacin-induced small intestinal damage in rats.

Prevention of NSAID-Induced Small Intestinal Mucosal Injury: Prophylactic Potential of Lansoprazole.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are used for the treatment of several inflammatory disorders including rheumatoid arthritis, are well known to cause gastroduodenal mucosal lesions as an adverse effect. Recently, the serious problem of NSAID-induced small intestinal damage has become a topic of great interest to gastroenterologists, since capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy are available for the detection of small intestinal lesions. Such lesions have been of great concern in clinical settings, and their treatment and prevention must be devised as soon as possible. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI), such as lansoprazole and omeprazole, show a potent anti-secretory effect. PPIs also have a gastroprotective effect, independent of their anti-secretory actions, which is probably mediated by inhibition of neutrophil functions as well as antioxidant actions. Administration of lansoprazole reduced the severity of the intestinal lesions in a dose-dependent manner, but omeprazole had no effect. The amount of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) protein in the intestinal mucosa was significantly increased by lansoprazole, but not by omeprazole. These results suggest that lansoprazole, but not omeprazole, ameliorates indomethacin-induced small intestinal ulceration through upregulation of HO-1/carbon monoxide. Therefore, lansoprazole may be useful for preventing the adverse effects of NSAIDs not only in the stomach but also in the small intestine.

Present status and strategy of NSAIDs-induced small bowel injury.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are well known to cause gastroduodenal mucosal lesions as an adverse effect. Recently, the serious problem of NSAID-induced small intestinal damage has become a topic of great interest to gastroenterologists, since capsule endoscopy and balloon enteroscopy are available for the detection of small intestinal lesions. Such lesions have been of great concern in clinical settings, and their treatment and prevention must be devised as soon as possible. The prevalence of NSAIDs-induced small intestinal injury is higher than had been expected. Recent studies show that more than 50% of patients taking NSAIDs have some mucosal damage in the small intestine. The gross appearance of NSAID-induced enteropathy varies, appearing variously as diaphragm-like strictures, ulcers, erosions, and mucosal redness. To investigate NSAID-induced enteropathy, and to rule out other specific enteropathies, other useful methods (in addition to capsule endoscopy and balloon enteroscopy) include such modalities as radiological examination of the small intestine, the permeability test, scintigraphy or the fecal excretion test using (111)Indium-labeled white blood cells, and measurement of the fecal calprotectin concentration. Diaphragm-like strictures and bleeding from mucosal breaks may be treatable with interventional enteroscopy. Misoprostol, metronidazole, and sulfasalazine are frequently used to treat NSAID-induced enteropathy, but have undesirable effects in some cases. In the experimental model, we confirmed that several existing drugs for gastroduodenal ulcers prevented indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury. Such drugs may be useful for preventing the adverse effects of NSAIDs not only in the stomach but also in the small intestine. We hope to examine these drugs in future clinical studies.