Knowledge and use of fluoride among Indiana dental professionals.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the knowledge of Indiana dentists and dental hygienists about fluoride's predominant mode of action and their protocols for the use of fluoride for dental caries prevention. METHODS: In 2000, questionnaires were mailed to 6,681 Indiana dentists and hygienists prior to the 2001 release of recommendations for the use of fluoride by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2005, the questionnaires were again sent to Indiana dental professionals to assess changes in knowledge and protocols. In addition, a 10 percent sample of Illinois dentists and hygienists were surveyed to determine the similarity of Indiana and Illinois responses. RESULTS: Questionnaires were anonymously completed and returned. In 2000, a minority of Indiana health professionals (17 percent) correctly identified that remineralization was fluoride's predominant mode of action. There was a significant increase in Indiana respondents correctly identifying this predominant mode of action between 2000 and 2005 (17 percent versus 25 percent, respectively, P < 0.0001). Fourteen percent of Illinois respondents answered correctly in 2005. Preeruptive incorporation of fluoride into enamel was the most frequently cited incorrect response (IN 2000, 79 percent; IN 2005, 71 percent; IL 2005, 82 percent). Some protocols for use of fluoride products reflected inadequate understanding of fluoride's predominant posteruptive mode of action. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of dental professionals surveyed were unaware of the current understanding of fluoride's predominant posteruptive mode of action through remineralization of incipient carious lesions. Additional research is indicated to assess fluoride knowledge and protocols of dental professionals nationwide. Educational efforts are needed to promote the appropriate use of fluoride.

Severe dental fluorosis in a Tanzanian population consuming water with negligible fluoride concentration.

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for dental fluorosis that cannot be explained by drinking water fluoride concentration alone. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-four Tanzanian children ages 9 to 19 (mean 14.0+/-SD 1.69), who were lifetime residents at differing altitudes (Chanika, 100 m; Rundugai, 840 m; and Kibosho, 1,463 m; Sites 1, 2, and 3 respectively) were examined for dental fluorosis and caries. They were interviewed about their food habits, environmental characteristics and use of a fluoride-containing food tenderizer known locally as magadi. Meal, urine, water and magadi samples supplied by the participants were analyzed for fluoride content. Urine samples were also analyzed for creatinine concentration. Four magadi samples from Sites 1 and 3 were analyzed for complete element composition. RESULTS: Of the 13 water samples from Site 2, 10 contained > or =4 mg/L F, ranging from 1.26 to 12.36 mg/L with a mean+/-SD of 5.72+/-4.71 mg/L. Sites 1 and 3 had negligible water fluoride of 0.05+/-0.05 and 0.18+/-0.32 mg/L respectively. Mean TFI fluorosis scores (range 0-9) for Site 2 were high: 4.44+/-1.68. In Sites 1 and 3, which both had negligible water fluoride, fluorosis scores varied dramatically: Site 1 mean maximum TFI was 0.01+/-0.07 and Site 3 TFI was 4.39+/-1.52. Mean DMFS was 1.39+/-2.45, 0.15+/-0.73 and 0.19+/-0.61 at Sites 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There were no restorations present. Urinary fluoride values were 0.52+/-0.70, 4.34+/-7.62, and 1.43+/-1.80 mg/L F at Sites 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean urinary fluoride values at Site 3 were within the normal urinary fluoride reference value range in spite of pervasive severe pitting fluorosis. Meal and magadi analyses revealed widely varied fluoride concentrations. Concentrations ranged from 0.01 to 22.04 mg/L F for meals and from 189 to 83211 mg/L F for magadi. Complete element analysis revealed the presence of aluminum, iron, magnesium, manganese, strontium and titanium in four magadi samples. There were much higher concentrations of these elements in samples from Site 3, which was at the highest altitude and had severe enamel disturbances in spite of negligible water fluoride concentration. An analysis of covariance model supported the research hypothesis that the three communities differed significantly in mean fluorosis scores (P<0.0001). Controlling for urinary fluoride concentration and urinary fluoride:urinary creatinine ratio, location appeared to significantly affect fluorosis severity. Urinary fluoride:urinary creatinine ratio had a stronger correlation than urinary fluoride concentration with mean TFI fluorosis scores (r=0.43 vs r= 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of enamel disturbances at Site 3 (1463 m) was not consistent with the low fluoride concentration in drinking water, and was more severe than would be expected from the subjects' normal urinary fluoride values. Location, fluoride in magadi, other elements found in magadi, and malnutrition are variables which may be contributing to the severity of dental enamel disturbances occurring in Site 3. Altitude was a variable which differentiated the locations.

The oral health of Indiana's independent, disabled adults.

This epidemiological study was conducted to measure the oral health and related variables of one of Indiana's special population groups: adults who are developmentally disabled, work in sheltered workshops and do not live in staffed residential facilities. Fifteen sheltered workshops in ten Indiana counties cooperated with this study in which 393 individuals were interviewed and received oral screening. Information was gathered regarding oral health status, history of utilization of dental services, availability of dental insurance or Medicaid and use of tobacco products. This study was conducted by the Indiana Foundation of Dentistry for the Handicapped and was funded by the Indiana State Department of Health.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with prosthetic joints.

Because of the threat of hematogenous spread of infection arising from invasive dental procedures, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered for patients who are endoprostheses recipients. No universally accepted protocol exists to guide practitioners in determining indications or treatment methods for such patients. To ascertain their recommendations, 264 Indiana orthopaedic surgeons were surveyed and 121, 46%, responded. A high percentage of respondents always or usually recommend preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for oral surgery, extraction and in the case of acute dental infection for hip arthroplasty patients. A slightly lesser percentage of respondents would premedicate for dental restorations for patients with lesser joint arthroplasties. Eighty-four percent of the respondents chose oral cephalosporin as the preferred antibiotic, but the recommended dosage and duration varied. In the absence of universally accepted protocol, it is recommended that dentists contact their patient's surgeon to determine what the most appropriate measures are for that particular person.