Engaging African Americans Living with HIV and Serious Mental Illness: Piloting Prepare2Thrive-A Peer-Led Intervention.

BACKGROUND: African American individuals living with HIV (AALWH) and serious mental illness (SMI) represent a vulnerable intersectional group with relatively poor health. These individuals may require consistent treatment engagement to manage both of their chronic conditions; however, due to multilevel factors they are relatively less likely to engage in treatment consistently. OBJECTIVES: To test the acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and participant outcomes of a brief psychoeducational and behavioral peer-led intervention. METHODS: Participants engaged in four weekly 90-minute pilot intervention sessions developed by the current community-based participatory research (CBPR) team. Sessions focused on problem-solving, communication skills, and coping with stigma, and were delivered by CBPR peerinterventionists. Participants completed pre- and postintervention surveys assessing treatment engagement and self-efficacy. RESULTS: Participants (N = 16) rated the intervention as acceptable, and attendance rates were high (87% average). Intervention leaders demonstrated exceptionally high fidelity to the intervention protocol. Participants reported a trend toward increasing antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence from pre- to post-intervention (on average, an 8% increase, p = 0.063), notable in the context of a pilot study. Those who attended all four intervention sessions reported a 17.5% increase in ART adherence. From pre- to post-intervention medical appointment attendance decreased, mental health appointment attendance increased, and HIV treatment selfefficacy significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial evidence for the feasibility of a CBPR-designed and tested, peer-led psychoeducation and behavioral intervention aiming to improve treatment engagement among AALWH and SMI, a marginalized group who could benefit from additional communitybased health research efforts.

Examining Associations Between State-Level Transgender Policies and Transgender Health.

Compared with their cisgender counterparts, transgender individuals face both structural-level discrimination and health disparities across health domains. We used recent population-level data to examine associations between state-level policy ratings regarding transgender people and transgender health (poor physical and mental health days, health behaviors, and health care utilization). We hypothesized more inclusive and protective state-level policies would predict better health of transgender individuals. The sample (N=1116) was approximately half white (n=572, 51.2%) and half transgender women (n=551, 49.3%). More transgender-inclusive and protective state-level policies predicted better health in three of four health domains. Policy and research implications are discussed.

Goal Setting and Treatment Adherence Among Patients With Chronic Illness and Depressive Symptoms: Applying a Patient-Centered Approach.

OBJECTIVE: Poor treatment adherence is a major problem among individuals with chronic illness. Research indicates that adherence is worsened when accompanied by depressive symptoms. In this preliminary study, we aimed to describe how a patient-centered approach could be employed to aid patients with depressive symptoms in following their treatment regimens. METHODS: The sample consisted of 14 patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV who reported clinically-significant depressive symptoms. Participant ratings of 23 treatment-related statements were examined using two assessment and analytic techniques. Interviews were conducted with participants to determine their views of information based on the technique. RESULTS: Results indicate that while participants with optimal adherence focused on views of treatment associated with side effects to a greater extent than participants with poor adherence, they tended to relate these side effects to sources of intrinsic motivation. CONCLUSION: The study provides examples of how practitioners could employ the assessment techniques outlined to better understand how patients think about treatment and aid them in effectively framing their health-related goals.