Efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: A protocol for a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (the SCORPIO-SR trial)

BackgroundMost antiviral treatments are targeted toward patients with severe or moderate-to-severe illness or those at high risk of developing severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Limited options exist for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, irrespective of vaccination history or risk status. Ensitrelvir is a novel oral SARS-CoV-2 3C-like protease inhibitor. The phase 2 studies of ensitrelvir have demonstrated promising results in mild-to-moderate COVID-19, whereas the challenge to evaluate the clinical efficacy due to shifting vaccinated status and the emergence of the Omicron variant has been suggested. Here, we describe the protocol for a phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, regardless of risk status or vaccination history. MethodsThis is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 within 120 hours from onset will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into 3 treatment arms--ensitrelvir 125 mg (375 mg as loading dose on Day 1), ensitrelvir 250 mg (750 mg as loading dose on Day 1), or placebo. The study interventions will be administered orally once daily for 5 days. The primary endpoint will be the time to resolution of the 5 symptoms of COVID-19 (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, cough, feeling hot or feverish, low energy or tiredness), and the primary population will be patients with <72 hours from COVID-19 onset to randomization in ensitrelvir 125 mg group. The key secondary endpoints include the change from baseline on Day 4 in the amount of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA and the time to the first negative SARS-CoV-2 viral titer. Closed testing procedure will be used for the primary and key secondary endpoints in both the primary and entire patient population. All safety assessments and adverse events will be reported. DiscussionTime to resolution of the 5 COVID-19 symptoms is a suitable endpoint to assess antiviral treatment in patients infected with the Omicron variant. In the phase 2 studies, ensitrelvir has demonstrated antiviral efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 and a trend toward reducing time to resolution of symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Through this study, we will seek to validate and establish the clinical efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Trial registrationJapan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp): jRCT2031210350.

Efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: the phase 2b part of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study

This phase 2b part of a randomized phase 2/3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir for mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to orally receive ensitrelvir fumaric acid 125 mg (375 mg on day 1; n=140) or 250 mg (750 mg on day 1; n=140) or placebo (n=141) once daily for 5 days. Compared with placebo, the change from baseline in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 titer (measured as log10 50% tissue-culture infectious dose) on day 4 was significantly greater with ensitrelvir 125 mg and 250 mg (differences from placebo: -0.41, P<0.0001 for both). The total score of predefined 12 COVID-19 symptoms showed an improving trend with ensitrelvir treatment without a significant intergroup difference. Most adverse events were mild in severity. Ensitrelvir treatment demonstrated a favorable antiviral efficacy and potential clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile. (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: jRCT2031210350)

A Randomized Phase 2/3 Study of Ensitrelvir, a Novel Oral SARS-CoV-2 3C-like Protease Inhibitor, in Japanese Patients With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 or Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Results of the Phase 2a Part

For the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), antiviral agents that can achieve rapid severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reduction are warranted. This double-blind, phase 2a part of a phase 2/3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir, a novel oral SARS-CoV-2 3C-like protease inhibitor, in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sixty-nine patients enrolled from 56 sites were randomized (1:1:1) to orally receive 5-day ensitrelvir fumaric acid (375 mg on day 1 followed by 125 mg daily or 750 mg on day 1 followed by 250 mg daily) or placebo and followed up until day 28. The primary outcome was change from baseline in SARS-CoV-2 viral titer. A total of 16, 14, and 17 patients in the ensitrelvir 125 mg, ensitrelvir 250 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, were included in the intention-to-treat population (mean age: 38.8, 40.4, and 38.0 years, respectively). On day 4, the change from baseline in SARS-CoV-2 viral titer (log10 50% tissue culture infectious dose/mL) in patients with positive viral titer and viral RNA at baseline was greater with ensitrelvir 125 mg (mean [standard deviation], -2.42 [1.42]; P = 0.0712) and 250 mg (-2.81 [1.21]; P = 0.0083) versus placebo (-1.54 [0.74]), and ensitrelvir treatment reduced SARS-CoV-2 RNA by -1.4 to -1.5 log10 copies/mL versus placebo. All adverse events were mild to moderate. Ensitrelvir treatment demonstrated rapid SARS-CoV-2 clearance and was well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: jRCT2031210350).

An Early Return-to-Work Program for COVID-19 Close Contacts in Healthcare During the Omicron Wave in Japan

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, maintaining adequate staffing in healthcare facilities is important to provide a safe work environment for healthcare workers (HCWs). Japans early return-to-work (RTW) program may be a rational strategy at a time when there is an increased demand for the services of HCWs. We assessed whether the early RTW program for HCWs who have been in close contact with a COVID-19 case in our hospital was justified. Close contacts were identified according to the guidance of the World Health Organization. Between January and March 2022, 256 HCWs were identified as close contacts (median age, 35 years; 192 female). Thirty-seven (14%) secondary attack cases of COVID-19 were detected. Among 141 HCWs who applied to the early RTW program, nurses and doctors comprised about three-quarters of participants, with a higher participation rate by doctors (78%) than nurses (59%). Eighteen HCWs tested positive for COVID-19 by the sixth day after starting the early RTW program. No COVID-19 infection clusters were reported during the observation period. These findings suggest that the early RTW program for COVID-19 close contacts was a reasonable strategy for HCWs during the Omicron wave.

Diagnosing metabolic acidosis in chronic kidney disease: importance of blood pH and serum anion gap

Metabolic acidosis is one of the most common complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is associated with the progression of CKD, and many other functional impairments. Until recently, only serum bicarbonate levels have been used to evaluate acid-base changes in patients with reduced kidney function. However, recent emerging evidence suggests that nephrologists should reevaluate the clinical approach for diagnosing metabolic acidosis in patients with CKD based on two perspectives; pH and anion gap. Biochemistry and physiology textbooks clearly indicate that blood pH is the most important acid-base parameter for cellular function. Therefore, it is important to determine if the prognostic impact of hypobicarbonatemia varies according to pH level. A recent cohort study of CKD patients showed that venous pH modified the association between a low bicarbonate level and the progression of CKD. Furthermore, acidosis with a high anion gap has recently been recognized as an important prognostic factor, because veverimer, a nonabsorbable hydrochloride-binding polymer, has been shown to improve kidney function and decrease the anion gap. Acidosis with high anion gap frequently develops in later stages of CKD. Therefore, the anion gap is a time-varying factor and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) is a time-dependent confounder for the anion gap and renal outcomes. Recent analyses using marginal structural models showed that acidosis with a high anion gap was associated with a high risk of CKD. Based on these observations, reconsideration of the clinical approach to diagnosing and treating metabolic acidosis in CKD may be warranted.

Comparative analysis of antigen-specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody isotypes in COVID-19 patients

Serological tests for detection of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in blood are expected to identify individuals who have acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and indication of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Many serological tests have been developed to detect antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. However, these tests have considerable variations in their specificity and sensitivity, and whether they can predict levels of neutralizing activity is yet to be determined. This study aimed to investigate the kinetics and neutralizing activity of various antigen-specific antibody isotypes against SARS-CoV-2 in serum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients confirmed via polymerase chain reaction test. We developed IgG, IgM and IgA measurement assays for each antigen, including receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike (S) protein, S1 domain, full length S protein, S trimer and nucleocapsid (N) domain, based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The assays of the S protein for all isotypes showed high specificity, while the assays for all isotypes against N protein showed lower specificity. The sensitivity of all antigen-specific antibody isotypes depended on the timing of the serum collection and all of them, except for IgM against N protein, reached more than 90% at 15-21 days post-symptom onset. The best correlation with virus neutralizing activity was found for IgG against RBD (RBD-IgG), and levels of RBD-IgG in sera from four severe COVID-19 patients increased concordantly with neutralizing activity. Our results provide valuable information regarding the selection of serological test for seroprevalence and vaccine evaluation studies.

Dry loop mediated isothermal amplification assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical specimens

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a major disease burden on many countries around the world. The spread of COVID-19 is anticipated to have a major impact on developing countries including African nations. To establish a point-of-care test for COVID-19, we developed a dry loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA. We carried out reverse transcription (RT)-LAMP using the Loopamp SARS-CoV-2 Detection kit (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan). The entire mixture except for the primers is dried and immobilized inside the tube lid. To determine the specificity of the kit, 22 viral genomes associated with respiratory infections, including the SARS coronavirus, were tested. No LAMP product was detected in reactions performed with RNA from these pathogens. The sensitivity of this assay, determined by either a real-time turbidity assay or colorimetric change of the reaction mixture, as evaluated by the naked eye or under illumination with ultraviolet light, was 10 copies/reaction. After the initial validation analysis, we analyzed 24 nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected from patients suspected to have COVID-19. Nineteen (79.2%) of the 24 samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, as determined by real-time RT-PCR analysis. Using the Loopamp SARS-CoV-2 Detection kit, we detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 15 (62.5%) of the 24 samples. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Loopamp 2019-CoV-2 detection reagent kit were 94.0%, 96.0%, 95.9%, and 94.1%, respectively. The dry LAMP method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was fast and easy to use, solves the cold chain problem, and therefore represents a promising tool for diagnosis of COVID-19 in developing countries. Author summaryCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major public health problem around the world. A reliable point-of-care (POC) test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) is urgently needed, especially in developing countries. The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method amplifies template nucleotides under isothermal conditions with high efficiency and specificity, both of which are major advantages for a POC test. In addition, because dry LAMP reagents can be stored at 4{degrees}C, it is suitable for use in developing countries. We evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of the Loopamp SARS-CoV-2 Detection kit (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), a dry LAMP method for amplifying viral RNA. The initial validation study revealed that the method was highly specific and sensitive (lower detection limit: 10 copies/reaction). We then analyzed 24 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from patients suspected to have COVID-19. Using the Loopamp SARS-CoV-2 Detection kit, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 15 (62.5%) of the 24 samples. Compared with the standard real-time reverse transcription PCR, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Loopamp SARS-CoV-2 Detection kit were 78.9%, 100%, 100%, and 55.6%, respectively.

Reliability of serological tests for COVID-19: Comparison of three immunochromatography test kits for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

BackgroundSeveral immunochromatographic serological test kits have been developed to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific antibodies, but their relative performance and potential clinical utility is unclear. MethodsThree commercially available serological test kits were evaluated using 99 serum samples collected from 29 patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). ResultsThe IgM antibody-positive rates of the three serological test kits for samples taken at the early stage of the disease (0-6 days after onset) were 19.0%, 23.8%, and 19.0%, respectively. The IgM antibody-positive rates over the entire period were 21.2%, 60.6%, and 15.2%, respectively. The IgG antibody-positive rates for samples taken after 13 days of onset were 100.0%, 97.6%, and 97.6%, respectively. ConclusionThere were large differences among the results of the three test kits. Only few cases showed positive results for IgM in the early stage of disease and the IgM antibody-positive rates over the entire period were low, suggesting that the kits used in this study were unsuitable for diagnosis of COVID-19. The IgG antibody was positive in almost all samples after 13 days of onset, suggesting that it may be useful for determining infections in the recent past.

Therapy of Infections due to Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens / 감염과화학요법

The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial pathogens (CRGNs) has increased dramatically during the last 10 years, but the optimal treatment for CRGN infections is not well established due to the relative scarcity of robust clinical data. The polymyxins remain the most consistently active agents against CRGNs in vitro. Tigecycline, based on its in vitro antibacterial spectrum, could also be considered as a therapeutic option in the treatment of infections caused by certain CRGNs. Other agents, including aminoglycosides, rifampin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, fosfomycin and fluoroquinolones, could be considered as monotherapy or combination therapy against CRGNs in appropriate contexts, as combination therapy with two or more in vitro active drugs appears to be more effective than monotherapy based on some clinical data. Several promising new agents are in late-stage clinical development, including ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and plazomicin. Given the shortage of adequate treatment options, containment of CRGNs should be pursued through implementation of adequate infection prevention procedures and antimicrobial stewardship to reduce the disease burden and prevent future outbreaks of CRGNs.