Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-967218

RESUMO

Objective@#To assess the efficacy of the FIGO 2018 classification system for nodal-specific classifications for early-stage cervical cancer; specifically, to examine the impact of nodal metastasis on survival and the effect of postoperative treatments, according to histological subtypes. @*Methods@#This society-based retrospective observational study in Japan examined 16,539 women with the 2009 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment from 2004 to 2015. Associations of cause-specific survival (CSS) with nodal metastasis and postoperative adjuvant therapy were examined according to histology type (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], n=10,315; and non-SCC, n=6,224). @*Results@#The nodal metastasis rate for SCC was higher than that for non-SCC (10.7% vs. 8.3%, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the impact of nodal metastasis on CSS was greater for non-SCC tumors (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.40–4.02) than for SCC tumors (adjusted-HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.70–2.84; p<0.001). Propensity score matching analysis showed significantly lower CSS rates for women with pelvic nodal metastasis from non-SCC tumors than from SCC tumors (5-year CSS rate, 75.4% vs. 90.3%, p<0.001). The CSS rates for women with nodal metastasis in SCC histology were similar between the postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and chemotherapy groups (89.2% vs. 86.1%, p=0.42), whereas those in non-SCC histology who received postoperative chemotherapy improved the CSS (74.1% vs. 67.7%, p=0.043). @*Conclusion@#The node-specific staging system in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer classification is applicable to both non-SCC tumors and SCC tumors; however, the prognostic significance of nodal metastases and efficacy of postoperative therapies vary according to histology.

2.
Ho Namkoong; Ryuya Edahiro; Koichi Fukunaga; Yuya Shirai; Kyuto Sonehara; Hiromu Tanaka; Ho Lee; Takanori Hasegawa; Masahiro Kanai; Tatsuhiko Naito; Kenichi Yamamoto; Ryunosuke Saiki; Takayoshi Hyugaji; Eigo Shimizu; Kotoe Katayama; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Norihiro Harada; Toshio Naito; Makoto Hiki; Yasushi Matsushita; Haruhi Takagi; Ryousuke Aoki; Ai Nakamura; Sonoko Harada; Hitoshi Sasano; Hiroki Kabata; Katsunori Masaki; Hirofumi Kamata; Shinnosuke Ikemura; Shotaro Chubachi; Satoshi Okamori; Hideki Terai; Atsuho Morita; Takanori Asakura; Junichi Sasaki; Hiroshi Morisaki; Yoshifumi Uwamino; Kosaku Nanki; Yohei Mikami; Sho Uchida; Shunsuke Uno; Rino Ishihara; Yuta Matsubara; Tomoyasu Nishimura; Takanori Ogawa; Takashi Ishiguro; Taisuke Isono; Shun Shibata; Yuma Matsui; Chiaki Hosoda; Kenji Takano; Takashi Nishida; Yoichi Kobayashi; Yotaro Takaku; Noboru Takayanagi; Soichiro Ueda; Ai Tada; Masayoshi Miyawaki; Masaomi Yamamoto; Eriko Yoshida; Reina Hayashi; Tomoki Nagasaka; Sawako Arai; Yutaro Kaneko; Kana Sasaki; Etsuko Tagaya; Masatoshi Kawana; Ken Arimura; Kunihiko Takahashi; Tatsuhiko Anzai; Satoshi Ito; Akifumi Endo; Yuji Uchimura; Yasunari Miyazaki; Takayuki Honda; Tomoya Tateishi; Shuji Tohda; Naoya Ichimura; Kazunari Sonobe; Chihiro Sassa; Jun Nakajima; Yasushi Nakano; Yukiko Nakajima; Ryusuke Anan; Ryosuke Arai; Yuko Kurihara; Yuko Harada; Kazumi Nishio; Tetsuya Ueda; Masanori Azuma; Ryuichi Saito; Toshikatsu Sado; Yoshimune Miyazaki; Ryuichi Sato; Yuki Haruta; Tadao Nagasaki; Yoshinori Yasui; Yoshinori Hasegawa; Yoshikazu Mutoh; Tomonori Sato; Reoto Takei; Satoshi Hagimoto; Yoichiro Noguchi; Yasuhiko Yamano; Hajime Sasano; Sho Ota; Yasushi Nakamori; Kazuhisa Yoshiya; Fukuki Saito; Tomoyuki Yoshihara; Daiki Wada; Hiromu Iwamura; Syuji Kanayama; Shuhei Maruyama; Takashi Yoshiyama; Ken Ohta; Hiroyuki Kokuto; Hideo Ogata; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Kenichi Arakawa; Masafumi Shimoda; Takeshi Osawa; Hiroki Tateno; Isano Hase; Shuichi Yoshida; Shoji Suzuki; Miki Kawada; Hirohisa Horinouchi; Fumitake Saito; Keiko Mitamura; Masao Hagihara; Junichi Ochi; Tomoyuki Uchida; Rie Baba; Daisuke Arai; Takayuki Ogura; Hidenori Takahashi; Shigehiro Hagiwara; Genta Nagao; Shunichiro Konishi; Ichiro Nakachi; Koji Murakami; Mitsuhiro Yamada; Hisatoshi Sugiura; Hirohito Sano; Shuichiro Matsumoto; Nozomu Kimura; Yoshinao Ono; Hiroaki Baba; Yusuke Suzuki; Sohei Nakayama; Keita Masuzawa; Shinichi Namba; Ken Suzuki; Nobuyuki Hizawa; Takayuki Shiroyama; Satoru Miyawaki; Yusuke Kawamura; Akiyoshi Nakayama; Hirotaka Matsuo; Yuichi Maeda; Takuro Nii; Yoshimi Noda; Takayuki Niitsu; Yuichi Adachi; Takatoshi Enomoto; Saori Amiya; Reina Hara; Toshihiro Kishikawa; Shuhei Yamada; Shuhei Kawabata; Noriyuki Kijima; Masatoshi Takagaki; Noa Sasa; Yuya Ueno; Motoyuki Suzuki; Norihiko Takemoto; Hirotaka Eguchi; Takahito Fukusumi; Takao Imai; Munehisa Fukushima; Haruhiko Kishima; Hidenori Inohara; Kazunori Tomono; Kazuto Kato; Meiko Takahashi; Fumihiko Matsuda; Haruhiko Hirata; Yoshito Takeda; Hidefumi Koh; Tadashi Manabe; Yohei Funatsu; Fumimaro Ito; Takahiro Fukui; Keisuke Shinozuka; Sumiko Kohashi; Masatoshi Miyazaki; Tomohisa Shoko; Mitsuaki Kojima; Tomohiro Adachi; Motonao Ishikawa; Kenichiro Takahashi; Takashi Inoue; Toshiyuki Hirano; Keigo Kobayashi; Hatsuyo Takaoka; Kazuyoshi Watanabe; Naoki Miyazawa; Yasuhiro Kimura; Reiko Sado; Hideyasu Sugimoto; Akane Kamiya; Naota Kuwahara; Akiko Fujiwara; Tomohiro Matsunaga; Yoko Sato; Takenori Okada; Yoshihiro Hirai; Hidetoshi Kawashima; Atsuya Narita; Kazuki Niwa; Yoshiyuki Sekikawa; Koichi Nishi; Masaru Nishitsuji; Mayuko Tani; Junya Suzuki; Hiroki Nakatsumi; Takashi Ogura; Hideya Kitamura; Eri Hagiwara; Kota Murohashi; Hiroko Okabayashi; Takao Mochimaru; Shigenari Nukaga; Ryosuke Satomi; Yoshitaka Oyamada; Nobuaki Mori; Tomoya Baba; Yasutaka Fukui; Mitsuru Odate; Shuko Mashimo; Yasushi Makino; Kazuma Yagi; Mizuha Hashiguchi; Junko Kagyo; Tetsuya Shiomi; Satoshi Fuke; Hiroshi Saito; Tomoya Tsuchida; Shigeki Fujitani; Mumon Takita; Daiki Morikawa; Toru Yoshida; Takehiro Izumo; Minoru Inomata; Naoyuki Kuse; Nobuyasu Awano; Mari Tone; Akihiro Ito; Yoshihiko Nakamura; Kota Hoshino; Junichi Maruyama; Hiroyasu Ishikura; Tohru Takata; Toshio Odani; Masaru Amishima; Takeshi Hattori; Yasuo Shichinohe; Takashi Kagaya; Toshiyuki Kita; Kazuhide Ohta; Satoru Sakagami; Kiyoshi Koshida; Kentaro Hayashi; Tetsuo Shimizu; Yutaka Kozu; Hisato Hiranuma; Yasuhiro Gon; Namiki Izumi; Kaoru Nagata; Ken Ueda; Reiko Taki; Satoko Hanada; Kodai Kawamura; Kazuya Ichikado; Kenta Nishiyama; Hiroyuki Muranaka; Kazunori Nakamura; Naozumi Hashimoto; Keiko Wakahara; Sakamoto Koji; Norihito Omote; Akira Ando; Nobuhiro Kodama; Yasunari Kaneyama; Shunsuke Maeda; Takashige Kuraki; Takemasa Matsumoto; Koutaro Yokote; Taka-Aki Nakada; Ryuzo Abe; Taku Oshima; Tadanaga Shimada; Masahiro Harada; Takeshi Takahashi; Hiroshi Ono; Toshihiro Sakurai; Takayuki Shibusawa; Yoshifumi Kimizuka; Akihiko Kawana; Tomoya Sano; Chie Watanabe; Ryohei Suematsu; Hisako Sageshima; Ayumi Yoshifuji; Kazuto Ito; Saeko Takahashi; Kota Ishioka; Morio Nakamura; Makoto Masuda; Aya Wakabayashi; Hiroki Watanabe; Suguru Ueda; Masanori Nishikawa; Yusuke Chihara; Mayumi Takeuchi; Keisuke Onoi; Jun Shinozuka; Atsushi Sueyoshi; Yoji Nagasaki; Masaki Okamoto; Sayoko Ishihara; Masatoshi Shimo; Yoshihisa Tokunaga; Yu Kusaka; Takehiko Ohba; Susumu Isogai; Aki Ogawa; Takuya Inoue; Satoru Fukuyama; Yoshihiro Eriguchi; Akiko Yonekawa; Keiko Kan-o; Koichiro Matsumoto; Kensuke Kanaoka; Shoichi Ihara; Kiyoshi Komuta; Yoshiaki Inoue; Shigeru Chiba; Kunihiro Yamagata; Yuji Hiramatsu; Hirayasu Kai; Koichiro Asano; Tsuyoshi Oguma; Yoko Ito; Satoru Hashimoto; Masaki Yamasaki; Yu Kasamatsu; Yuko Komase; Naoya Hida; Takahiro Tsuburai; Baku Oyama; Minoru Takada; Hidenori Kanda; Yuichiro Kitagawa; Tetsuya Fukuta; Takahito Miyake; Shozo Yoshida; Shinji Ogura; Shinji Abe; Yuta Kono; Yuki Togashi; Hiroyuki Takoi; Ryota Kikuchi; Shinichi Ogawa; Tomouki Ogata; Shoichiro Ishihara; Arihiko Kanehiro; Shinji Ozaki; Yasuko Fuchimo; Sae Wada; Nobukazu Fujimoto; Kei Nishiyama; Mariko Terashima; Satoru Beppu; Kosuke Yoshida; Osamu Narumoto; Hideaki Nagai; Nobuharu Ooshima; Mitsuru Motegi; Akira Umeda; Kazuya Miyagawa; Hisato Shimada; Mayu Endo; Yoshiyuki Ohira; Masafumi Watanabe; Sumito Inoue; Akira Igarashi; Masamichi Sato; Hironori Sagara; Akihiko Tanaka; Shin Ohta; Tomoyuki Kimura; Yoko Shibata; Yoshinori Tanino; Takefumi Nikaido; Hiroyuki Minemura; Yuki Sato; Yuichiro Yamada; Takuya Hashino; Masato Shinoki; Hajime Iwagoe; Hiroshi Takahashi; Kazuhiko Fujii; Hiroto Kishi; Masayuki Kanai; Tomonori Imamura; Tatsuya Yamashita; Masakiyo Yatomi; Toshitaka Maeno; Shinichi Hayashi; Mai Takahashi; Mizuki Kuramochi; Isamu Kamimaki; Yoshiteru Tominaga; Tomoo Ishii; Mitsuyoshi Utsugi; Akihiro Ono; Toru Tanaka; Takeru Kashiwada; Kazue Fujita; Yoshinobu Saito; Masahiro Seike; Yosuke Omae; Yasuhito Nannya; Takafumi Ueno; Tomomi Takano; Kazuhiko Katayama; Masumi Ai; Atsushi Kumanogoh; Toshiro Sato; Naoki Hasegawa; Katsushi Tokunaga; Makoto Ishii; Ryuji Koike; Yuko Kitagawa; Akinori Kimura; Seiya Imoto; Satoru Miyano; Seishi Ogawa; Takanori Kanai; Yukinori Okada.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21256513

RESUMO

To elucidate the host genetic loci affecting severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is an emerging issue in the face of the current devastating pandemic. Here, we report a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of COVID-19 in a Japanese population led by the Japan COVID-19 Task Force, as one of the initial discovery GWAS studies performed on a non-European population. Enrolling a total of 2,393 cases and 3,289 controls, we not only replicated previously reported COVID-19 risk variants (e.g., LZTFL1, FOXP4, ABO, and IFNAR2), but also found a variant on 5q35 (rs60200309-A at DOCK2) that was associated with severe COVID-19 in younger (<65 years of age) patients with a genome-wide significant p-value of 1.2 x 10-8 (odds ratio = 2.01, 95% confidence interval = 1.58-2.55). This risk allele was prevalent in East Asians, including Japanese (minor allele frequency [MAF] = 0.097), but rarely found in Europeans. Cross-population Mendelian randomization analysis made a causal inference of a number of complex human traits on COVID-19. In particular, obesity had a significant impact on severe COVID-19. The presence of the population-specific risk allele underscores the need of non-European studies of COVID-19 host genetics.

3.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-915123

RESUMO

Objective@#The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology conducted a retrospective multi-institutional survey of patients who underwent cervical conization in Japan. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for positive surgical margins in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) patients after therapeutic cervical conization and those for positive margins in patients who did not experience recurrence and did not undergo additional treatment. @*Methods@#In 2009 and 2013, 14,832 patients underwent cervical conization at 205 institutions in Japan. Of these, 8856 patients who underwent therapeutic conization fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their histologic findings and clinical outcomes were evaluated based on standard statistical procedures and clinical and demographic characteristics. @*Results@#Negative and positive margins were observed in 7,585 and 1,271 (14.4%) patients, respectively. The predictors of positive margins were menopausal status (p<0.001), loop electrosurgical excision procedure (p<0.001), and Shimodaira-Taniguchi (S-T) conization (p<0.001). Of 1,271 patients with positive margins, 1,060 underwent no additional treatment; among those 1,060 patients, 129 (12.2%) experienced recurrence. The predictors of positive margins in patients who did not undergo additional treatment and did not experience recurrence were age, parity, gravidity, S-T conization, and laser scalpel conization. @*Conclusion@#Menopausal status and treatment procedures were associated with positive margins after therapeutic conization of CIN 3. It is important to understand the characteristics of treatment procedures and select an appropriate procedure for each case. For elderly or menopausal patients with positive margins, immediate additional treatment is recommended.

4.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-915065

RESUMO

The fifth edition of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines for the treatment of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer was published in 2020. The guidelines contain 6 chapters—namely, (1) overview of the guidelines; (2) epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer; (3) recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer; (4) borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary; (5) malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary; and (6) malignant sex cord-stromal tumors. Furthermore, the guidelines comprise 5 algorithms—namely, (1) initial treatment for ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer; (2) treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer; (3) initial treatment for borderline epithelial ovarian tumor; (4) treatment for malignant germ cell tumor; and (5) treatment for sex cord-stromal tumor. Major changes in the new edition include the following: (1) revision of the title to “guidelines for the treatment of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer”; (2) involvement of patients and general (male/female) participants in addition to physicians, pharmacists, and nurses; (3) clinical questions (CQs) in the PICO format; (4) change in the expression of grades of recommendation and level of evidence in accordance with the GRADE system; (5) introduction of the idea of a body of evidence; (6) categorization of references according to research design; (7) performance of systematic reviews and meta-analysis for three CQs; and (8) voting for each CQ/recommendation and description of the consensus.

5.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-938868

RESUMO

Objective@#Regional lymph node (LN) dissection is a standard surgical procedure for endometrial cancer, but there is currently no clear consensus on its therapeutic significance. We aimed to determine the impact of regional LN dissection on the outcome of endometrial cancer. @*Methods@#Study subjects comprised 36,813 patients who were registered in the gynecological tumor registry of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, had undergone initial surgery for endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2011, and whose clinicopathological factors and prognosis were appropriate for our investigation. The following clinicopathological factors were obtained from the registry: age, surgical stage classification, Union for International Cancer Control tumor, node, metastasis classification, histological type, histological differentiation, presence or absence of LN dissection, and postoperative treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological factors and therapeutic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer. @*Results@#Analysis of all subjects showed that the group that underwent LN dissection had a significantly better overall survival than the group that did not undergo dissection. Analysis based on stage showed similar results across groups, except for stage Ia. Analysis based on stage and histological type showed similar results across groups, except for stage Ia endometrial carcinoma G1 or Ia G2. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors indicated that LN dissection is an independent prognostic factor and that it has a greater impact on prognosis than adjuvant chemotherapy. @*Conclusion@#Despite the limitations of a retrospective study with some biases, the results suggest that LN dissection in endometrial cancer has a prognostic effect.

6.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20154088

RESUMO

BackgroundCoronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes severe acute respiratory failure. Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is known as the mechanism for severe forms of other coronavirus diseases. The clinical progression of COVID-19 before and after IgG antibody seroconversion was investigated. MethodsFifty-three patients with reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCT)-confirmed COVID-19 viral pneumonia with or without respiratory failure were retrospectively investigated. The timing of the first IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2-positive date, as well as changes of C-reactive protein (CRP) as an inflammatory marker and blood lymphocyte numbers, was assessed using serial preserved blood samples. FindingsTen patients recovered without oxygen therapy (mild/moderate group), 32 patients had hypoxemia and recovered with antiviral drugs (severe/non-ICU group), and 11 patients had severe respiratory failure and were treated in the ICU (6 of them died; critical/ICU group). The first IgG-positive date (day 0) was observed from 5 to 18 days from the onset of disease. At day 0, a CRP peak was observed in the severe and critical groups, whereas there was no synchronized CRP peak on day 0 in the mild/moderate group. In the severe/non-ICU group, the blood lymphocyte number increased (P=0.0007) and CRP decreased (P=0.0007) after day 0, whereas CRP did not decrease and the blood lymphocyte number further decreased (P=0.0370) in the critical/ICU group. InterpretationThe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 viral pneumonia observed in week 2 may be related to an antibody-related mechanism rather than uncontrolled viral replication. In the critical form of COVID-19, inflammation was sustained after IgG seroconversion. Fundingnone

7.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-834449

RESUMO

The Fourth Edition of the Guidelines for Treatment of Uterine Body Neoplasm was published in 2018. These guidelines include 9 chapters: 1. Overview of the guidelines, 2. Initial treatment for endometrial cancer, 3. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer, 4. Post-treatment surveillance for endometrial cancer, 5. Treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, 6. Fertility-sparing therapy, 7. Treatment of uterine carcinosarcoma and uterine sarcoma, 8. Treatment of trophoblastic disease, 9. Document collection; and nine algorithms: 1-3. Initial treatment of endometrial cancer, 4. Postoperative adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer, 5. Treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer, 6. Fertility-sparing therapy, 7. Treatment for uterine carcinosarcoma, 8. Treatment for uterine sarcoma, 9. Treatment for choriocarcinoma. Each chapter includes overviews and clinical questions, and recommendations, objectives, explanation, and references are provided for each clinical question. This revision has no major changes compared to the 3rd edition, but does have some differences: 1) an explanation of the recommendation decision process and conflict of interest considerations have been added in the overview, 2) nurses, pharmacists and patients participated in creation of the guidelines, in addition to physicians, 3) the approach to evidence collection is listed at the end of the guidelines, and 4) for clinical questions that lack evidence or clinical validation, the opinion of the Guidelines Committee is given as a “Recommendations for tomorrow”.

9.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-716094

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficiency of identifying patients with suspicious severe lesions by conization among prediagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and 2 patients in Japan. METHODS: The data in a Japanese nation-wide registry for cervical cancer (2009 and 2011) was collected to analyze the clinical efficacy of pre- and postdiagnosis for 13,215 Japanese women who underwent treatment by conization. Their preoperative and postoperative histologic findings and clinical outcomes were evaluated using standard statistical procedures including clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Almost half of 1,536 women who were treated by conization after the prediagnosis of CIN1 and 2 because the lesions showed no evidence of natural regression actually contained CIN1–2 (45.0%), CIN3 (47%), or invasive cancer (2.7%) in their cervical tissue. They underwent conization either for therapeutic (treatment) (78.5%) or diagnostic (21.5%) reasons. Invasive disease was diagnosed postoperatively more often in diagnostic cases (6.1%) than in therapeutic cases (2.8%). All the patients survived their diagnostic and therapeutic conization after approximately 30 months of follow up. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the continuous observation of the prediagnosed CIN1 and 2 cases by the combination of cytology, colposcopy and histology in Japan has worked successfully to identify severe lesions by using conization as well in the process.


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Povo Asiático , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Colposcopia , Conização , Seguimentos , Japão , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...