Influence of daily alcohol consumption on serum adiponectin levels in men.

BACKGROUND: The risk of cardiovascular diseases is lower among moderate alcohol drinkers than among both nondrinkers and heavy drinkers. However, factors that can account for the U-shaped or J-shaped relationship between daily alcohol consumption and incident cardiovascular diseases remain obscure. PURPOSE: The present cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between alcohol consumption and serum adiponectin levels. METHOD: Total adiponectin was measured in 527 males participating in health check-up programs (age range 40-86 years, mean 60.5 years). Based on questionnaire responses, alcohol intake was categorized into three groups: none or occasional (A1); <50 g/day and ≥3 days/week (A2); and ≥50 g/day and ≥3 days/week (A3). RESULTS: No significant differences in adiponectin levels were observed among the three alcohol consumption groups of subjects without the metabolic syndrome (MetS). In subjects with the MetS, the adiponectin level was significantly higher in the A2 (moderate drinker) group than in both the A1 and A3 groups. MetS subjects in group A2 had higher HDL-C levels than those in A1, but levels in group A3 were not significantly different from those in group A2. CONCLUSION: An increased adiponectin level in moderate alcohol drinkers who have MetS may contribute to the U-shaped relationship between alcohol consumption and risk of cardiovascular events, in addition to the involvement of HDL-C.

Comparison of positive cases for B-type natriuretic peptide and ECG testing for identification of precursor forms of heart failure in an elderly population.

Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels have been reported to be elevated in various types of cardiac disorders and in precursors of CHF. To elucidate the potential ability of BNP testing to identify individuals with structural cardiac disease (ie, hypertensive heart disease, coronary heart disease, valvular heart disease) among community-dwelling elderly persons, cases which were positive on BNP testing were compared to those positive on ECG testing. In the initial phase, we performed plasma BNP measurements and ECG in 856 participants (age > or = 65 years) selected from a general population. From within this group, subjects with an abnormal ECG (n = 125) were selected according to the Minnesota code. Subjects with elevated BNP were selected independently on the basis of plasma levels (n = 112). In the next phase, subjects in both groups were invited to complete Rose's angina questionnaire and to undergo physical examination and transthoracic echocardiography. In this subject group (positive in ECG testing and/or BNP testing), the two tests had comparable sensitivity (65% versus 59%: NS) and specificity (40% versus 41%: NS) for identifying hypertensive heart disease (n = 17). For coronary heart disease (n = 12), the two tests had also comparable sensitivity (58% versus 42%: NS) and specificity (39% versus 41%: NS). However, for selection of valvular heart disease (n = 7), BNP testing had higher sensitivity than ECG testing (100% versus 14%; P < 0.01) with comparable specificity (43% versus 40%: NS). Several types of structural heart disease, in particular valvular heart disease, could be identified exclusively by BNP testing, suggesting that BNP measurement can make a significant contribution to screening for CHF precursors when used in combination with ECG in elderly populations.

The limited value of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide for screening for left ventricular hypertrophy among hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: Several reports have suggested that plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are elevated in hypertensive patients especially with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. However, few data have been available concerning the utility of plasma BNP measurement to identify LV hypertrophy in hypertensive patients in a general population screening context. METHODS: We measured plasma BNP concentrations in 1112 volunteers in a health screening program (mean age, 57 years). All subjects underwent electrocardiography, chest X-ray, and echocardiography. Among the sample, 284 subjects were designated as hypertensive because they were on antihypertensive drugs or showed elevated systemic blood pressure. By echocardiography, 36 of the hypertensive patients showed significant LV hypertrophy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age and sex between the LV hypertrophy and non-LV hypertrophy groups. Plasma BNP levels in the LV hypertrophy group were significantly higher than in the non-LV hypertrophy group (19.4 +/- 18.9 v 28.2 +/- 28.2 pg/mL; P <.05). However, the ability of plasma BNP levels to discriminate between LV hypertrophy and non-LV hypertrophy patients was not sufficient as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.588 (95% CI: 0.528-0.646) with sensitivity of 50.0% and specificity of 69.0%. Positive and negative predictive values for detecting LV hypertrophy among hypertensive patients were 18.9% and 90.5%, respectively. This ability did not improve significantly when the screening was limited to patients with untreated LV hypertrophy or concentric LV hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma BNP testing in a mass screening setting is of limited use for the identification of LV hypertrophy patients among hypertensive patients with heterogeneous etiology.