Comparison of acromiohumeral distance and glenohumeral internal rotation angle between the empty can test and modified empty can test: "thumb pointing down" versus "elbow pointing laterally".

BACKGROUND: During the empty can test, the direction of the thumb (downward) has been widely used as an instruction for producing glenohumeral internal rotation. However, the combination of forearm pronation and thumb motion as a compensatory movement could contribute to the lack of glenohumeral internal rotation during the empty can test. This study aimed to compare the glenohumeral internal rotation angle between the conventional empty can (with thumb direction) and modified empty can tests (with elbow direction), as well as the acromiohumeral distance between the full can, conventional empty can, and modified empty can tests. METHODS: In this laboratory study, we measured the glenohumeral internal rotation angle using a motion sensor and the acromiohumeral distance using ultrasonography during the following tests: full can test (thumb pointing up), conventional empty can test (thumb pointing down), and modified empty can test (elbow pointing laterally) in 20 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional empty can test, the glenohumeral internal rotation angle was significantly greater during the modified empty can test (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the acromiohumeral distance measured in the modified empty can test was significantly less than that in the full can test (p < 0.001) and conventional empty can test (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in the acromiohumeral distance between the full can test and the conventional empty can test (p > 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: During the empty can test, the instructions should be given to patients based on the elbow direction (elbow pointing laterally). The modified empty can test can produce full glenohumeral internal rotation, compared with instructions based on the thumb direction (thumb pointing down). Consequently, the modified empty can test can produce a more decreased subacromial space.

Comparison of pelvic rotation angle in the transverse plane in the supine position and during active straight leg raise between people with and without nonspecific low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Faults in postural alignment and movement of the pelvis are associated with non-specific low back pain. However, limited studies have investigated the differences in pelvic rotation angle in the transverse plane in the supine position and during active straight leg raise between subjects with and without non-specific low back pain. METHODS: Thirty-one subjects with non-specific low back pain and 31 subjects without non-specific low back pain were examined. Angular measures of the pelvic rotation angle in the transverse plane were obtained in the supine position and during active straight leg raise using a Smart KEMA measurement system. FINDING: The pelvic rotation angle in the transverse plane during active straight leg raise was significantly greater in subjects with non-specific low back pain than in healthy subjects (p < 0.05). However, the pelvic rotation angle in the transverse plane in the supine position and asymmetry index of the pelvic rotation angle during active straight leg raise were not significantly different between subjects with and those without non-specific low back pain. INTERPRETATION: This indicates that a greater pelvic rotation angle in the transverse plane during active straight leg raise could be contributing factors to the development of a non-specific low back pain related to lumbopelvic instability.

Comparison of the Strength and Electromyography of the Evertor Muscles With and Without Toe Flexion in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability.

BACKGROUND: Weakness of evertor strength is controversial in chronic ankle instability (CAI). Ankle evertor muscles are attached to the toe joints as well as to the metatarsal bone. Therefore, it is necessary to consider toe joint position for the measurement of evertor strength. The purpose of this study was to compare ankle evertor strength and muscle activity during eversion with and without toe flexion (TF) in individuals with CAI and individuals in a healthy group. METHODS: Fifteen subjects with CAI and 15 healthy subjects participated in this study. Isometric ankle evertor strength and muscle activity of the peroneus longus (PL), peroneus brevis (PB), and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) were measured during eversion with and without TF. RESULTS: The results indicated a significant interaction effect in evertor strength (P = .03) and no significant interaction effect on EMG of the PL (P = .08), PB (P = .12), and EDL (P = .28). However, measurements of muscle activity of the PL and PB between eversion with and without TF revealed a significant difference in the CAI group (P < .01) and no significant difference in the healthy group (PL: P = .07; PB: P = .13). CONCLUSION: The results indicated that subjects with CAI had increased EDL compensation and reduced selective activation of the PL and PB during eversion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings suggest that clinicians should consider the activation of EDL when training the evertor of patients with CAI.