Predicting nipple-areolar involvement using preoperative breast MRI and primary tumor characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative assessment of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is invaluable when considering nipple-sparing mastectomy. Our hypothesis is that breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may predict involvement of the NAC with tumor. METHODS: Clinical, histopathologic, and imaging data were compiled for patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI followed by mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy for malignancy between 2006 and 2009. Blinded rereview of all MRI studies was performed by a breast MRI imager and compared to initial MRI findings. Multivariate analysis identified variables predicting NAC involvement with tumor. RESULTS: Of 77 breasts, 18 (23 %) had tumor involving or within 1 cm of the NAC. The sensitivity of detecting histopathologically confirmed NAC involvement was 61 % with history and/or physical examination, and 56 % with MRI. Univariate analysis identified the following variables as significant for NAC involvement: large tumors near the nipple on preoperative MRI, node-positive disease, invasive lobular carcinoma, advanced histopathologic T stage, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis, only tumor size >2 cm and distance from tumor edge to the NAC <2 cm on MRI maintained significance. Pearson correlation coefficient for MRI size compared to histopathologic size was 0.53 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: MRI is not superior to thorough clinical evaluation for predicting tumor in or near the NAC. However, MRI-measured tumor size and distance from the NAC are correlated with increased risk of NAC involvement. The combination of preoperative history and physical examination, tumor characteristics, and breast MRI can aid the surgeon in predicting a tumor-involved nipple more than any single modality alone.

Epitrochlear sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma: interval or independent?

Most primary melanomas on the distal upper extremity metastasize to a sentinel lymph node (SLN) in the axillary basin, but occasionally a primary melanoma will drain to the epitrochlear basin. The relationship between tumor-draining axillary and epitrochlear SLNs is unclear. We hypothesize that the epitrochlear SLN functions in an interval manner with the axillary lymph node basin. We queried our melanoma database to identify patients who underwent SLN biopsy for a distal upper-extremity melanoma. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, patterns of nodal drainage, and incidence of SLN metastasis were analyzed. Of 255 patients identified, 38 (14.9%) had an epitrochlear SLN. Mean Breslow thickness was 2.26 mm. All patients with epitrochlear drainage had concurrent axillary drainage and underwent axillary and epitrochlear SLN biopsies. Of these 38 patients, two (5.2%) had epitrochlear and axillary SLN metastasis, four (10.5%) had epitrochlear metastasis only, four (10.5%) had axillary metastasis only, and the remaining 28 (73.7%) had tumor-free SLNs. The invariable association of epitrochlear and axillary drainage in this study suggests that epitrochlear nodes function in an interval role with the axillary lymph node basin. Therefore we recommend that all patients with a positive epitrochlear SLN undergo completion axillary dissection.