Accurate recognition and effective treatment of ventricular fibrillation by automated external defibrillators in adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in patients <16 years old. BACKGROUND: AEDs are standard therapy in out-of-hospital resuscitation of adults and have led to higher success rates. Their use in children and adolescents has never been evaluated, despite recommendations from the American Heart Association that they be used in children >8 years of age. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children <16 years old who underwent out-of-hospital cardiac resuscitation and on whom an AED was used during the resuscitation. The setting was rural and urban prehospital emergency medical systems. Patients were identified by review of a database of cardiac arrests maintained by a large surveillance program of these services. RESULTS: AEDs were used to assess cardiac rhythm in 18 patients with a mean age of 12.1 +/- 3.7 years. The cardiac rhythms were analyzed 67 times and included ventricular fibrillation (25), asystole/pulseless electrical activity (32), sinus bradycardia (6), and sinus tachycardia (4). The AEDs recognized all nonshockable rhythms accurately and advised no shock. Ventricular fibrillation was recognized accurately in 22 (88%) of 25 episodes and advised or administered a shock 22 times. Sensitivity and specificity for accurate rhythm analysis were 88% and 100%, respectively. One patient with a nonshockable rhythm survived, whereas 3 of 9 patients with ventricular fibrillation survived. CONCLUSIONS: These data furnish evidence that AEDs provide accurate rhythm detection and shock delivery to children and young adolescents. AED use is potentially as effective for children as it is for adults.

Truncated exponential versus damped sinusoidal waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation.

Currently available transthoracic defibrillators use either a damped sinusoidal or truncated exponential (TE) waveform. Truncated exponential waveforms deliver a long pulse if the transthoracic impedance is high; it has been suggested that such a long pulse may be less effective for defibrillation. Our objective was to compare the ability of damped sinusoidal (DS) waveform shocks versus TE waveform shocks to terminate ventricular fibrillation (VF) and achieve survival from witnessed cardiac arrest. We retrospectively reviewed field-recorded electrocardiograms from 86 patients with witnessed VF, treated by prehospital personnel equipped with DS or TE waveform defibrillators. Forty-four patients received 130 shocks from TE defibrillators; 42 patients received 108 shocks from DS defibrillators. There were no significant differences in time from arrest to first shock (8.0 vs 8.1 minutes), nor were there any differences in the size of the communities involved. The shocks resulted in the following rhythms: organized rhythm: TE: 15 of 130 (12%), DS: 24 of 108 (22%), p = 0.10 (NS); persistent VF: TE: 85 of 130 (65%), DS: 45 of 108 (42%), p <0.01; asystole: TE: 30 of 130 (23%), DS: 39 of 108 (36%), p = NS; and survival to hospital discharge: TE: 5 of 44 (11%), DS: 8 of 42 (19%), p = NS. We conclude that DS waveforms terminated VF more frequently than TE, but there was no significant difference in resumption of an organized rhythm or survival. A prospective comparison of these 2 waveforms is needed.