Inhibitory effect on the tobacco mosaic virus infection by a plant RING finger protein.

In the yeast two-hybrid screening of plant factors interacting with tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), we found a protein containing a RING finger motif in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and designated it as TARF (TMV-associated RING finger protein). TARF is a homologue of a Lotus japonicus RING finger protein (LjnsRING) involved in the symbiotic interaction between L. japonicus and Mesorhizobium loti. When TARF was silenced by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) method, TMV RNA accumulation as well as the number of foci formed by GFP-tagged TMV increased drastically. Transient overexpression of TARF reduced the accumulation of TMV. Moreover, TARF transcription was rapidly upregulated by the inoculation of TMV in tobacco plants. These results indicated that TARF is a RING finger protein that inhibits the accumulation of TMV via the interaction of TMV RdRp.

Reactivity of shrimp allergy-related IgE antibodies to krill tropomyosin.

BACKGROUND: Krill, which morphologically resembles small shrimp, represents small ocean crustaceans and has been used for human consumption in Japan and some other countries. The major allergen in crustaceans has been reported to be tropomyosin, but the allergenicity of krill tropomyosin remains uncertain. METHODS: Amino acid sequences of tropomyosin in two species of krill (Euphausia superba and E. pacifica) were deduced. Recombinant krill tropomyosins were produced in Escherichia coli using a pCold IV vector system, and the cross-reactivity of shrimp allergy-related IgE to the recombinant tropomyosins and several animal protein extracts was assessed by immunoblotting. RESULTS: The deduced amino acid sequences of the E. superba and E. pacifica tropomyosins (designated as Eup s 1 and Eup p 1, respectively) were 284 residues and showed significant homology to those of shrimp, lobster and crab tropomyosins. Shrimp allergy-related IgE reacted to approximately 38-kDa protein bands in krill (E. superba), shrimp, lobster and crab protein extracts but did not react to protein extracts from either mollusks or vertebrates. Furthermore, the IgE recognized rEup s 1 and rEup p 1 as 38-kDa protein bands, and absorption of the IgE with rEup s 1 removed IgE reactivity to recombinant tropomyosins and protein extracts from krill and shrimp. CONCLUSIONS: Krill tropomyosins included highly homologous sequences to previously reported IgE-binding epitopes in Pen a 1 (tropomyosin of Penaeus aztecus). The cross-reactivity in shrimp allergy-related IgE binding among krill, shrimp, lobster and crab tropomyosins was revealed. These observations suggest the potential allergenicity of krill tropomyosin.

Interaction of replicase components between Cucumber mosaic virus and Peanut stunt virus.

Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and Peanut stunt virus (PSV) each have genomes consisting of three single-stranded RNA molecules: RNA 1, 2 and 3. RNAs 1 and 2 encode the 1a and 2a proteins, respectively, which are necessary for replication of the viral genome. Although RNA 3 is exchangeable between CMV and PSV, exchange of RNA 1 and 2 between the two viruses has been unsuccessful. In this study, reassortants containing PSV RNA 1 and CMV RNA 2 together with RNA 3 of CMV or PSV were shown to be able to replicate their genomic RNA, but not to transcribe subgenomic RNA 4 in tobacco protoplasts. Conversely, the reassortant consisting of CMV RNA 1 and PSV RNA 2 together with RNA 3 of CMV or PSV could not replicate. Subsequently, a yeast two-hybrid system was used to analyse the in vivo interaction between the 1a and 2a proteins. The C-terminal half of PSV-1a protein interacted with the N-terminal region of 2a protein of both PSV and CMV, but the C-terminal half of CMV-1a and the N-terminal region of PSV-2a did not interact. These results suggest that RNA replication in the interspecific reassortant between CMV and PSV requires compatibility between the C-terminal half of the 1a protein and the N-terminal region of the 2a protein, and this compatibility is insufficient for transcription of subgenomic RNA 4.