Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Rehabil Res ; 47(2): 81-86, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38517535

RESUMO

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the pharyngeal motor cortex has shown beneficial effects on poststroke dysphagia. Previous studies, however, using intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) for dysphagia have targeted the suprahyoid motor cortex. This study aimed to investigate the effects of iTBS to the pharyngeal motor cortex in patients with poststroke dysphagia, using ultrasound and videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS). A randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients with dysphagia due to a first-time unilateral stroke. Patients who had signs and symptoms of dysphagia and showed aspiration or penetration on VFSS were included. Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either real or sham iTBS groups, and each patient underwent five sessions of iTBS to the ipsilesional pharyngeal motor cortex. Each iTBS session was followed by conventional dysphagia treatment for 30 min. The hyoid-larynx approximation measured by ultrasound, penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) and functional dysphagia scale (FDS) assessed by VFSS were evaluated before and after completion of iTBS. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, including age and type of stroke. The hyoid-larynx approximation ratio increased in the real iTBS group and decreased in the sham iTBS group (median values of pre-post differences were 0.27 vs. -0.01, P  < 0.001). The PAS and FDS showed greater improvements in the real iTBS group than in the sham iTBS group (median values of pre-post differences of the PAS were -2.50 vs. 0.00, P  = 0.004; median values of pre-post differences of the FDS were -12.50 vs. -2.50, P  < 0.001). No adverse effects were reported during or after iTBS sessions. Five-session iTBS to the pharyngeal motor cortex combined with conventional treatment led to a significant improvement in poststroke dysphagia in terms of hyoid-larynx approximation which is related to the suprahyoid muscle. Considering the short duration of one iTBS session, this can be an efficient and effective treatment tool for patients with this condition.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana , Humanos , Transtornos de Deglutição/reabilitação , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Idoso , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/métodos , Córtex Motor
2.
J Spinal Cord Med ; : 1-7, 2023 Nov 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982995

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain with sham controls, using neuropathic pain-specific evaluation tools. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation medicine department of a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three patients with spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups (real iTBS, real rTMS, and sham rTMS). Each patient underwent five sessions of assigned stimulation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Before and after completion of the five sessions, patients were evaluated using the self-completed Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, Numeric Rating Scale, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, and Neuropathic Pain Scale. RESULTS: Real iTBS and real rTMS reduced pain levels after stimulation according to all the evaluation tools, and the changes were significant when compared to the values of the sham rTMS group. No significant differences were found between the real iTBS and real rTMS groups. CONCLUSION: Both iTBS and rTMS were effective in reducing spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain. When safety, convenience, and compliance are considered, iTBS would have an advantage over rTMS in clinical situations with spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain.Trial Registration: This trial was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (registration no. KCT0004976).

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...