Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cytopathology ; 32(2): 227-232, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33415845

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential tool in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cytology from EUS-FNA, to correlate the results with the corresponding histopathological diagnoses and to analyse the impact of retrospective assignment of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) reporting system categories. METHODS: All pancreatic FNA specimens reported at the Royal Free Hospital during a 2-year period were retrospectively collected and assigned to the PSC system categories. Any available corresponding histological samples were assessed for concordance. RESULTS: In total, 236 cytology specimens from 223 patients were identified, of which 108 (45.8%) had corresponding histology samples. The main reason for cyto-histological discrepancy was sampling error. Interpretive error was identified in one case. Overall, sensitivity was 92.5%, specificity was 100%, diagnostic accuracy of cytology was 95%, false-positive rate was 0% and false-negative rate was 7.5%. The implementation of the new reporting system reduced the number of cases in the atypical category. All cases previously categorised as suspicious or malignant remained in the same category. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is an accurate method for evaluating pancreatobiliary lesions. The implementation of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology diagnostic system enhances standardisation of the reporting terminology and reduces the number of samples in the non-standardised and equivocal atypical category.


Assuntos
Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Técnicas Citológicas/métodos , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas , Adulto Jovem
2.
BJOG ; 112(4): 490-4, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15777450

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the conventional large loop excision of the transformation zone (CLLETZ) and the "top-hat" technique (THLLETZ) differ in (a) completeness of excision of the cervical lesion, (b) depth of cervical tissue excised and (c) adequacy of follow up by cytology and colposcopy. DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: University Teaching Hospital, London. SAMPLE: Five hundred and thirteen consecutive patients matched for age, parity, smoking history and referral cytology who had either CLLETZ (286-5%) or THLLETZ (227-44%) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS: All procedures were performed or supervised by BSCCP-accredited colposcopists. All cytology and histology were reviewed by two specialist cytohistopathologists. Cervical stenosis was defined as difficulty in or inability in obtaining an endocervical brush smear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Depth of cervical tissue excised, histology of endocervical margins, post-LLETZ cytologic and colposcopic findings. RESULTS: The mean depth of excision in the CLLETZ group was 12.1 mm (SD = 4.4 mm) and 20.8 mm (SD = 6.4 mm) in the THLLETZ group. The incidence of involved endocervical margins was 2.8% in the CLLETZ group and 5.2% in the THLLETZ group (P= 0.1). There was CIN in the "top-hat specimen" of 10 THLLETZ cases (4.4%, CI = 95%). The first post-treatment cervical smear was inadequate in 5 (4.1%) cases in the CLLETZ group and 20 (11.7%) in the THLLETZ group (P= 0.022). Cervical stenosis was found in 21 (7.7%) cases in the CLLETZ group and in 64 (30.9%) cases in the THLLETZ group (P < 0.0001). Eleven (4%) patients in the CLLETZ group had cytological and/or colposcopic evidence of residual CIN compared with 12(5.8%) patients in THLLETZ group (P= 0.4). In the first follow-up assessment, 21.7% of the CLLETZ group had incomplete colposcopy compared with 48.7% in the THLLETZ group (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the CLLETZ, the THLLETZ (1) removed more cervical tissue but did not have a lower incidence of involved endocervical margins, and (2) resulted in significantly higher incidence of inadequate post-treatment colposcopic and cytological follow up. These data indicate that there is no justification to performing a "top-hat" LLETZ routinely.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Colposcopia , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...