The Effects of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems on Athletes.

The rapid rise in popularity of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), or vaping, has not eluded the athletic population. Increasing use of youth sports participants, as well as collegiate and professionals, means sports medicine providers and coaches alike should be familiar with the effects of these devices. Current evidence demonstrates an impact on both the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems. These effects appear less significant than smoking tobacco cigarettes, but the extent and longevity of the consequences of ENDS use is unclear. Mechanisms for recovery, such as sleep and injury healing, also are affected. Lastly, the emergence of life-threatening pulmonary disease associated with ENDS use may have devastating effects on an athlete. This article will highlight the recent literature on the impact of ENDS on athletes and athletic performance, as well as the potentially life-threatening consequences of use.

Joint Space Injection for Osteitis Pubis in an Airborne Jump Injury: A Case Report.

Osteitis Pubis (OP) is groin pain caused by overloading stresses on the pubic symphysis. This is often caused by the repetitive stress seen in competitive sports, but can also be caused by rapid acceleration or deceleration. It is a diagnosis of exclusion made after other entities such as fracture or infection are ruled out. It is often treated conservatively with rest, Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatories (NSAIDS), and Physical Therapy (PT). After these treatment modalities have failed, intra-articular injection with local anesthetics and steroids can be considered. We report a case of a 22-year-old Male Active Duty Army Soldier who presented with OP immediately after landing during a routine Airborne Jump exercise. The Soldier reported landing in such a way that his feet did not impact the ground at the same time, creating a sheering force on his pelvis. Following two months of failed treatment involving NSAIDS and PT, the patient was referred to Sports Medicine where he received an injection of 1 mL of 1% lidocaine and 40 mg of triamcinolone into the pubic symphysis joint space. Shortly afterward the patient endorses complete resolution of his symptoms without return of symptoms at 1-month follow-up. Although injection of the pubic symphysis with local anesthetic and steroids has been previously described, this is the first time it has been described in a jump injury.

Safely Managing Acute Osteoarthritis in the Emergency Department: An Evidence-Based Review.

BACKGROUND: Joint pain caused by acute osteoarthritis (OA) is a common finding in the emergency department. Patients with OA often have debilitating pain that limits their function and ability to complete their activities of daily living. In addition, OA has been associated with a high percentage of arthritis-related hospital admissions and an increased risk of all-cause mortality. Safely managing OA symptoms in these patients can present many challenges to the emergency provider. OBJECTIVES: We review the risks and benefits of available treatment options for acute OA-related pain in the emergency department. In addition, evidence-based recommendations will be made for safely managing pain and disability associated with OA in patients with comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, renal insufficiency, and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding. DISCUSSION: Commonly used treatments for OA include acetaminophen, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids, each with varying degrees of efficacy and risk depending on the patient's underlying comorbidities. Effective alternative therapies, such as topical preparations, intra-articular corticosteroid injections, bracing, and rehabilitation are likely underused in this setting. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency providers should be aware of the risks and benefits of all treatment options available for acute OA pain, including oral medications, topical preparations, corticosteroid injections, bracing, and physical therapy.

Urine dipstick testing to rule out rhabdomyolysis in patients with suspected heat injury.

BACKGROUND: Heat injury is a common, potentially life-threatening medical condition. In austere or mass-casualty conditions an easy to use, sensitive screening test could be a valuable tool to care providers and evacuation planners. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine if a simple urine dipstick test for blood is sensitive for detection of rhabdomyolysis in the suspected heat injury patient. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A convenience sample of patients presenting to a military community hospital Emergency Department during summer months with a presenting complaint consistent with suspected heat injury had urine dipstick testing performed for blood and compared with the results of formal urinalysis and serum creatine kinase. RESULTS: 60 patients were enrolled in the study, seven had creatine kinase levels greater than 1000 U/L, 14 had levels greater than 500 U/L, and 26 had levels greater than 250 U/L. Using 1000 U/L, urine dipstick testing had a sensitivity of 14% and a specificity of 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Urine dipstick testing for blood is not a useful screening test for rhabdomyolysis in patients suspected to have significant heat injury.

Bedside ultrasound for the detection of soft tissue foreign bodies: a cadaveric study.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of bedside ultrasound, as performed by emergency physicians with typical equipment, in detecting small, soft tissue foreign bodies, using a cadaveric model. This was a prospective study, using 6 unembalmed human cadavers and 6 ultrasound-credentialed, emergency medicine residency-trained physicians as sonographers. Incisions were made in 150 total sites of the extremities and each site was randomly assigned one of five groups: wood, metal, plastic, glass, or no foreign body. All foreign bodies were 2.5 mm3 in total volume or less, no longer than 5 mm in any dimension, and inserted to a depth of up to 3 cm. Ultrasound was performed with a SonoSite TITAN (SonoSite, Inc., Bothell, WA) ultrasound system using a L38/10-5 broadband linear array transducer. Sonographers were blinded to the number, type, and location of foreign bodies. A total of 900 ultrasound examinations were recorded. Overall sensitivity of ultrasound for foreign body detection was 52.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.9%-56.2%), and overall specificity was 47.2% (95% CI 39.9%-54.5%). Positive predictive value was 79.9% (95% CI 76.3%-83.5%), and negative predictive value was 20.0% (95% CI 16.2%-23.7%). Sensitivity for individual sonographers ranged from 40.8% to 72.3% (average 52.6% +/- 13.3%), and specificity ranged from 30% to 66.7% (average 47.2% +/- 15.1%). Inter-observer reliability was poor. In our model, bedside ultrasound performed by emergency physicians was neither sensitive nor specific for the presence of small soft tissue foreign bodies.

Use of ultrasound to assess acute fracture reduction in emergency care settings.

OBJECTIVE: There is a need to develop tools for the rapid diagnosis and treatment of fractures and intraosseous pathology in remote and austere environments. Several emergency and orthopedic studies have demonstrated ultrasound to be a reliable tool in diagnosing these conditions in both adult and pediatric patients. The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the ability of the ultrasound to assess in "real-time" the success of fracture reduction in adult patients in the emergency department (ED), in comparison with the accepted standard, plain film radiography, for the purposes of future application in austere environments. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Emergency department at an academic medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of five patients presenting to an ED with clinical evidence of fractures (three radial, one phalangeal, and one metacarpal). INTERVENTIONS: A Sonosite Titan portable ultrasound system with L38/10-5:38-mm broadband linear array transducer was used to assess prereduction and postreduction angulations and alignment. Alignment was reconfirmed with use of fluoroscopy and plain radiography. RESULTS: The ultrasound confirmed proper reduction and realignment in all five cases, from an average prereduction angle of alignment of 37.4 degrees to an average postreduction angle of 4.4 degrees. The use of the ultrasound resulted in adequate visualization of the reduction in all cases. Regional anesthesia or sedation and limited pressure with the probe resulted in no verbalization of pain by any of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, emergency physicians demonstrated the use of ultrasound in place of traditional radiography to either confirm adequate reduction or assess the need for further manipulation. Our pilot study suggests that ultrasound has a possible future role in fracture reduction management in both the ED as well as "austere"prehospital locations.

The effects of an accelerated triage and treatment protocol on left without being seen rates and wait times of urgent patients at a military emergency department.

To combat increasing wait times and left without being seen (LWOBS) rates, our emergency department (ED) implemented an accelerated triage and treatment (TNT) protocol. A TNT team was allocated treatment rooms to begin management of urgent patients if a bed in the main ED was not available. A retrospective database study was performed using three separate 6-month periods: two control periods before the intervention (P1, P2) and one period after the intervention (P3). The primary outcome measures were LWOBS rate, time to evaluation, and total ED time for urgent patients. The time to be seen for EC3 patients improved from P1 to P3 by an average of 12.6 minutes (18.5%, p < 0.0001) and from P2 to P3 by an average of 12.0 minutes (17.6%, p < 0.0001). The EC3 LWOBS rate decreased from 2.0% in P1 and 1.9% in P2 to 0.8% in P3 (p < 0.0001 for both). The use of an accelerated TNT protocol was associated with a significant reduction in EC3 patient LWOBS rates and time to evaluation.

Is digital intubation an option for emergency physicians in definitive airway management?

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether digital intubation is a valid option for definitive airway control by emergency physicians. METHODS: Digital intubation was performed by 18 emergency medicine residents and 4 staff emergency medicine physicians on 6 different cadavers. Placement was confirmed by direct laryngoscopy. The total time for all attempts used, as well as the number of attempts, was recorded. Each participant attempted intubation on all 6 cadavers. RESULTS: For 5 of the 6 cadavers, successful intubation occurred 90.9% of the time (confidence interval [CI], 85.5%-96.3%) for all participants. The average number of attempts for these 5 cadavers was 1.5 (CI, 1.4-1.7), and the average time required for success or failure was 20.8 seconds (CI, 16.9-24.8). The sixth cadaver developed soft tissue damage and a false passage near the vocal cords resulting in multiple failed attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Although the gold standard for routine endotracheal intubation remains to be direct laryngoscopy, its effectiveness in certain situations may be limited. We believe that digital intubation provides emergency physicians with another option in securing the unprotected airway.