Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Since 2005, several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been approved to treat people with type 2 diabetes. These agents are considered for use at the same point in the treatment paradigm as basal insulins. A comprehensive comparison of these drug classes, therefore, can help inform treatment decisions. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs compared with basal insulins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases were searched. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ≥16 weeks' duration comparing GLP-1 RAs vs basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic drugs were included. Data on the change from baseline to 26 weeks (±10 weeks) of treatment in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight, as well as the proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia, were extracted. Fixed-effect pairwise meta-analyses were conducted where data were available from ≥2 studies. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs were identified and 11 were meta-analysed. The once-weekly GLP-1 RAs, exenatide long acting release (LAR) and dulaglutide, led to greater, statistically significant mean HbA1c reductions vs basal insulins (exenatide: -0.31% [95% confidence interval -0.42, -0.19], dulaglutide: -0.39% [-0.49, -0.29]) whilst once-daily liraglutide and twice-daily exenatide did not (liraglutide: 0.06% [-0.06, 0.18], exenatide: 0.01% [-0.11, 0.13]). Mean weight reduction was seen with all GLP-1 RAs while mean weight gain was seen with basal insulins. Interpretation of the analysis of hypoglycaemia was limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Because of the limited number of available studies sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity could not be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Although weight reduction is seen with all GLP-1 RA's, only the once-weekly agents, exenatide LAR and dulaglutide, demonstrate significant HbA1c reductions when compared to basal insulins.

Efficacy and safety of exenatide administered before the two largest daily meals of Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether exenatide administered before breakfast and dinner (BD) or before lunch and dinner (LD) provided similar glycemic control in Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who consume a small breakfast. METHODS: In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks). Treatment assignment was determined by a computer-generated random sequence using an interactive response system. Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast. The primary endpoint was HbA(1c) change from baseline to endpoint. Secondary endpoints included fasting serum glucose (FSG) level, 7-point SMBG profile, and safety. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00359879. RESULTS: 377 participants (55% female, age 54 +/- 10 years, weight 82 +/- 15 kg, BMI 31 +/- 4 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) 8.4 +/- 0.9%; mean +/- SD) from Brazil and Mexico were randomized to study treatment. HbA(1c) reduction with exenatide administration before BD was non-inferior to administration before LD (mean difference between (LD-BD) treatments: 0.14%; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.32%, p=0.120). Both treatments resulted in statistically significant HbA(1c) reductions at endpoint (BD -1.2% and LD -1.1%, respectively, p<0.001). In Brazil, the non-inferiority criteria were met for HbA(1c) reduction between treatment arms (-0.12%; CI -0.37 to 0.13%, p=0.344), whereas in Mexico, there was a difference favoring exenatide administration before BD (0.41%; CI 0.16 to 0.66%, p=0.002). At endpoint, there were no statistical significant differences between the BD and LD arms in mean change in FSG (0.50 mmol/L; CI -0.02 to 1.02 mmol/L, p=0.058) and daily mean change in SMBG (0.19 mmol/L; CI -0.17 to 0.54 mmol/L, p=0.295). The rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia (5.2 events/patient-year vs. 6.1 events/patient-year) and nausea (23% vs. 25%), were similar between the BD and LD arms, respectively. A limitation of the study design was that caloric intake of patients and meal times were not monitored. CONCLUSIONS: In T2DM patients who consume a small breakfast, exenatide administration before breakfast or lunch resulted in significant improvement in glycemic control.