Safety of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with allergic diseases.

BACKGROUND: Considering the considerable prevalence of allergic disease in the general population, an urgent need exists for inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines that can be safely administered to those subjects. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study including 1926 participants who received inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, compared their local and systemic reactions in 7 days after each dose of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG after vaccination in all participants. RESULTS: Pain at the injection site within seven days after the first injection was the most commonly reported local reaction, occurring in 31.0% of the patients with allergic disease and 18.9% in the control group, respectively (P < 0.001). After the first dose, systemic events were more frequently reported in patients with allergic disease than control group (30.2% vs. 22.9%, P < 0.001). After the second dose, systemic events occurred less often, affecting 17.1% of the patients with allergic disease and 11.1% of the control group (P < 0.002). The occurrence of fatigue, vertigo, diarrhea, skin rash, sore throat were the most frequent systemic reactions. Overall, a lower incidence of local and systemic reactive events was observed after the second dose than the first dose in patients with allergic disease and control group. Nearly all participants had positive IgG antibodies, and participants with allergic disease had higher frequencies compared with control group (100.0 vs.99.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Although local and systemic reactions were more frequently reported in patients with allergic disease than control group, administration of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was safe and well tolerated by all participants; no participants experienced a serious adverse event, and none were hospitalized. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100048549. Registered Jul 10, 2021.

Abrupt versus gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy for Chinese treatment-seeking smokers: A retrospective, observational, cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of abrupt and gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy. METHODS: A total of 278 smokers who experienced moderate-to-severe nicotine dependence and visited a Chinese smoking cessation outpatient clinic from March 2017 to February 2021 were enrolled. This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study. Participants were divided into two groups by the cessation strategy they received: the abrupt cessation group (n=139, tobacco was not controlled during the first 3 weeks before the target cessation date and smoking was entirely discontinued on the 22nd day) and the gradual cessation group (n=139, tobacco was gradually reduced in the first 3 weeks before the target cessation date and smoking was discontinued on the 22nd day). The abstinence rates were compared between groups (7-day point prevalence abstinence rates at 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment; and 1-month and 3-month continuous abstinence rates of 6-month follow-up). Possible factors that influence efficacy, reasons for smoking cessation failure, and associated adverse events were also analyzed. RESULTS: No significant difference in the 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates at 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment was observed between the groups (p>0.05). The 1-month continuous abstinence rate of the gradual cessation group was higher than that of the abrupt cessation group (51.1% vs 31.7%; χ2=10.812, p=0.001). The 3-month continuous abstinence rate of the gradual cessation group was also higher than that of the abrupt cessation group (42.4% vs 27.3%; χ2=6.983, p=0.008). Abrupt cessation was a risk factor for successful smoking cessation than gradual cessation (AOR=2.39; 95% CI: 1.15-3.85, p=0.013),the motivation of 'prevention and treatment of own diseases' reduced the risk of incomplete abstinence (AOR=0.87; 95% CI: 0.38-0.99, p=0.049). The incidence of adverse events was higher in the abrupt cessation group than in the gradual cessation group. The incidence rates of nausea and insomnia were statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with abrupt cessation, gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy produced higher abstinence rates and relatively milder withdrawal symptoms.

Nomogram to predict successful smoking cessation in a Chinese outpatient population.

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to establish and internally validate a nomogram to predict successful smoking cessation in a Chinese outpatient population. METHODS: A total of 278 participants were included, and data were collected from March 2016 to December 2018. Predictors for successful smoking cessation were evaluated by 3-month sustained abstinence rates. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select variables for the model to predict successful smoking cessation, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a novel predictive model. The discriminatory ability, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the nomogram were determined by the concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis, respectively. Internal validation with bootstrapping was performed. RESULTS: The nomogram included living with a smoker or experiencing workplace smoking, number of outpatient department visits, reason for quitting tobacco, and varenicline use. The nomogram demonstrated valuable predictive performance, with a C-index of 0.816 and good calibration. A high C-index of 0.804 was reached with interval validation. Decision curve analysis revealed that the nomogram for predicting successful smoking cessation was clinically significant when intervention was conducted at a successful cessation of smoking possibility threshold of 19%. CONCLUSIONS: This novel nomogram for successful smoking cessation can be conveniently used to predict successful cessation of smoking in outpatients.

Coronavirus disease 19 with gastrointestinal symptoms as initial manifestations: a case report.

Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in December 2019, an epidemic has spread rapidly worldwide. COVID-19 is caused by the highly infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. A 42-year-old woman presented to hospital who was suffering from epigastric discomfort and dyspepsia for the past 5 days. Before the onset of symptoms, she was healthy, and had no travel history to Wuhan or contact with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases. An examination showed chronic superficial gastritis with erosion and esophagitis. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen showed a lesion in the right lower lobe of the lungs. Chest computed tomography showed multiple ground-glass opacity in the lungs. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. There was no improvement after antibiotic treatment. Polymerase chain reaction performed 2 days later was positive and she was diagnosed with COVID-19. After several days of antiviral and symptomatic treatments, her symptoms improved and she was discharged. None of the medical staff were infected. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are nonspecific, making differentiating it from other diseases difficult. This case shows the sequence in which symptoms developed in a patient with COVID-19 with gastrointestinal symptoms as initial manifestations.