Physical and well-being effect of scapular kinesio taping combined with conventional physiotherapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Kinesio taping (KT) is one of the treatment methods used on patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). There are different results regarding its effectiveness in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of scapular KT combined with a conventional physiotherapy program on scapular dyskinesia, shoulder pain, upper extremity function, and well-being in patients with SIS. METHODS: The study was conducted with 60 outpatients diagnosed with SIS, aged 40-65 years. The patients were divided into two groups: KT [conventional physiotherapy program + scapular KT (targets scapular retraction and is applied along the inferior-medial edge of the scapula, starting from the processus coracoids), n= 30] and control [conventional physiotherapy program, n= 30]. In before- and after-treatment evaluations, the Lateral Scapular Slide Test (LSST) for scapular dyskinesia, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for shoulder pain, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) for upper extremity function were used. In addition, at the end of treatment, a Kinesio taping Satisfaction Survey, created by the researchers, was filled out by the KT group for the assessment of well-being. RESULTS: The interaction effect of Group*Time was not statistically significant in all outcome measures (p> 0.05). However, the main effect of both group and time was statistically significant in the DASH-Function/Symptom, VAS-Rest, VAS-Activity, and VAS-Night (p< 0.05). Moreover, only the main effect of time was statistically significant in LSST-1 and LSST-3 (p< 0.05). In the KT group, the satisfaction level was 8.50 ± 1.69 and the recommendation level was 8.72 ± 1.81. CONCLUSION: Both conventional physiotherapy programs and additional scapular KT improved scapular dyskinesia, reduced pain, and increased the upper extremity function. Adding scapular KT to treatment did not change the results, but it had positive psychological effects and yielded a high satisfaction rate.

The effects of basic body awareness therapy on balance in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomised crossover trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effects of basic body awareness therapy (BBAT) and conventional treatments (CT) on balance in patients with chronic neck pain. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with neck pain participated in this randomised two-period crossover trial. Patients were divided into A (BBAT/CT) (n = 17) and B (CT/BBAT) (n = 18) groups. Group A received BBAT twice a week for 6 weeks, whereas Group B received CT within the same parameters. After a 5-week washout period, the treatments received by the groups were changed. The primary outcome was balance, assessed via the sensory organisation test (SOT) using the computerised dynamic posturography device. The secondary outcome was pain assessed by the visual analogue scale. Assessments were performed before and after primary and secondary treatments. RESULTS: In Group A, the SOT conditions 4, 5, 6; composites score; and visual and vestibular system scores increased after BBAT; however, only condition five scores and vestibular system scores increased (p < .05) in Group B, which started with CT. Within the groups, both treatments were effective for easing pain (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients who started the therapy with BBAT showed more improvement in balance, no differences were observed between the therapies.