Iterative active deformational methodology for tumor delineation: Evaluation across radiation treatment stage and volume.

PURPOSE: To introduce, implement, and assess an iterative modification to the active deformational image segmentation method as applied to cervical cancer tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparison by Jaccard similarity (JS) between this active deformational method and manual segmentation was performed on tumors of various sizes across preradiation, 3 weeks postradiation, and 6 weeks postradiation using a General Linear Mixed Model across 121 studies from 52 patients with Stage IIB-IV cervical cancers. RESULTS: The deformable segmentation method produced promising levels of agreement including JS factors of 0.71+/-0.11 in the preradiation studies. The analysis illustrated a rate of improvement in JS with increasing tumor volume that differed between the preradiation and 6 weeks postradiation stage (P=0.0474). In the large preradiated tumors each additional cm3 of volume was associated with an increase or improvement in JS of 0.0008 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0003, 0.0014). In the smaller postradiation tumors, each additional cm3 of volume was associated with a more robust improvement in JS of 0.0046 (95% CI: 0.0009, 0.0082). CONCLUSION: Agreement was strongly affected by tumor volume, and its performance was most impacted across volume in the later stages of radiation therapy. The deformation-based segmentation method appears to demonstrate utility for delineating cervical cancer tumors, particularly in the earliest stages of radiation treatment, where agreement is greatest.

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a new ultrashort contrast-enhanced (CE) MR angiography (MRA) for the morphologic evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The method was compared with conventional X-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and time-of-flight (TOF) MRA in 22 patients to assess the angioarchitecture of the malformations which is essential for treatment planning and follow-up. Two experienced MR readers independently evaluated both techniques with regard to the assessment of feeding arteries, AVM nidus, and venous drainage patterns. Contrast-enhanced MRA was able to detect all AVMs seen on DSA, whereas the TOF MRA failed in 1 patient with a very small AVM. In the assessment of the different vessel components of the AVM there was no difference for the detection and delineation of feeding arteries and the AVM. The venous drainage patterns could always be clearly delineated in the CE MRA, whereas TOF MRA could demonstrate the exact venous drainage in only 9 patients. Contrast-enhanced MRA was found to be superior to conventional TOF MRA in the assessment of the angioarchitecture of cerebral AVMs especially regarding the assessment of the venous drainage patterns. The superiority is supported by the improved vessel-to-background contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios. The major limitations of this new technique consist of a low spatial resolution at the used time resolution which can be improved by further sequence modifications. Contrast-enhanced MRA is thus an important additional imaging technique for treatment planning and follow-up of AVMs.