HIPEC in Ovarian Cancer: When and to Whom?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal candidates for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Health Sciences University, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtasian Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between 2013 and 2021. METHODOLOGY: Ovarian cancer patients who underwent HIPEC and CRS for peritoneal involvement were included in this study. Thermosolutions were prepared as a closed system by using HT 2000 hyperthermic perfusion device. Then, cisplatin was applied at 100 mg/m2 at 42-42.5 °C for 60 minutes after CRS. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were enrolled. The median age was 54 years (27-80) at the time of diagnosis. Forty (85.1%) patients had high grade serous carcinoma and 22 (46.7%) patients had clinical stage 3C disease. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 13 (3-24) in the whole population. HIPEC was applied as first-line treatment in 25 (51%) patients. Eleven (23.4%) patients had HIPEC in the post-neoadjuvant interval whereas 10 (21.3%) patients had it in platinum sensitive relapse. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 31(95% CI:11-50), 33 (95% CI:1-67), and 18 (95% CI:8-27) months in the primary, post-neoadjuvant interval, and platinum-sensitive relapse HIPEC groups, respectively. The patients with lower PCI (PCI<13) had significantly better OS than others with higher PCI (PCI>13, 145 months versus 42 months, p=0.034). CONCLUSION: HIPEC with CRS should be considered in selected serous carcinoma patients with peritoneal involvement, especially for the patients with primary ovarian cancer with lower PCI (PCI<13). KEY WORDS: Ovarian cancer, HIPEC, Peritoneal cancer index.

The impact of the Covid 19 pandemic in colorectal cancer.

AIM: COVID-19 was first seen in China at the end of December 2019. The disease spread rapidly and was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020. Only urgent surgi cal cases and oncological surgeries that cannot be postponed were performed during this pandemic process. As a wasting disease, colorectal cancer (CRC) itself and its corresponding treatment may weaken the immune response to respiratory bacteria, makes patients more susceptible to virus infection. Besides, colorectal cancer patients are immunosuppressed because of the side effects of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy taken. The choice of surgical procedures and perioperative management of the patients with CRC has become even more important in the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact on CRC surgery is unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the preopartive, intraoperative, and postoperative findings of patients operated for colorectal cancer in our clinic. MATERIAL-METHOD: We defined the 'COVID-19' period as occurring between 12-03-2020 and 31-08-2020. All the enrolled patients were divided into two groups, pre-COVID-19 group (Pre-CG; 66 cases) and COVID-19 group (CG; 43 cases). A total of 109 patients with CRC were included in this study. Patient characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological findings were compared between groups. RESULTS: The waiting times before admission increased in CG (Pre-CG [5.34±2.55] vs CG [18.13±9.11]; p<0.001). After admission, the waiting time before surgery was longer in CG (Pre-CG [2.04±1.34] vs CG [5.53±6.00]; p<0.001). There were no significant difference between the groups in terms of operation method (laparoscopic/open), operation type (emergency/elective), surgical procedure, combine organ resection, intraoperative blood transfusion requirment, operation time (p values, respectively; p=0.082; p=0.474; p=0.317; p=0.656; p=0.617; p=0.696). In this study, no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative complications (p=0.357) and mortality (p=0.826). It was found that the ICU stay was significantly shorter in CG (Pre-CG [11.63±2.22] vs CG [1.48±0.76]; p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it was seen that the COVID-19 pandemic did not affect morbidity and mortality in CRC surgery, but it prolonged admission waiting and operation waiting times. Since there is very little data in the literature regarding the effect of COVID-19 on CRC surgery, our study will guide future studies on this subject. KEY WORDS: Colorectal Cancer, Coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19, Surgery.

Can CT Pelvimetry Be Used to Predict Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Laparoscopic Resection of Middle and Lower Rectum Cancer?

Background Previous studies have shown that pelvimetry can be valuable in predicting surgical difficulties in rectal cancer operations. However, its usability in predicting circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement remains debatable. This study investigated the factors affecting CRM status and the importance of computed tomography (CT) pelvimetry in predicting CRM involvement in laparoscopic resection of middle and lower rectal cancer. Methodology In this study, we retrospectively investigated the data of 111 patients who underwent a laparoscopic operation for middle and lower rectum cancer at Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology between January 2014 and January 2020. The predictive value of CT pelvimetry and other variables on the CRM status was analyzed. Results The following four pelvic parameters differed significantly between the genders: transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet (p = 0.024), anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic outlet (p = 0.003), transverse diameter of the pelvic outlet (p < 0.001), and pelvic depth (p < 0.001). The effect of pelvic anatomic parameters on CRM involvement was not found to be significant. It was found that tumor height from the anal verge (p = 0.004), tumor size (p < 0.001), and gender (p = 0.033) were significant risk factors for CRM involvement. Survival was poor in patients with male gender (p = 0.032), perineural invasion (p < 0.001), and grade 3 tumor. Conclusions In this study, no benefit was found in predicting CRM positivity from CT pelvimetry in the laparoscopic resection of middle and lower rectal cancer. Besides, tumor height from the anal verge, tumor size, and gender were important factors for CRM positivity. Although our study sheds light on this issue, prospective randomized studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in appendix cancer A single-center experience.

AIM: The traditional treatment for appendiceal cancer with peritoneal spread is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) but added HIPEC chemotherapy to cytoreductive surgery and has shown that it improves overall survival. The aim of this study was to report the results of CRS and HIPEC treated patients with appendiceal cancers which is based on the experience of at Surgical oncology department. MATERIAL-METHOD: Ankara University School of Medicine, Deparment of Surgical Oncology. The data of patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC for appendiceal cancer between January 2008 - January 2019 was retrospectively analysed. 40 patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with unresectable liver metastasis, large retroperitoneal tumor, tumoral infiltration in the intestinal mesentery and liver hilum were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The mean (±sd) PCI was 17.98 (±8.21). Twenty six patients's completeness of cytoreduction score was 0(65.0%), 10(25.0%) CCS-1, 3(7.5%) CCS-2 and 1(2.5%) CCS-3. There was statistically significant difference with prognosis between ccr score, ASA, lymphovascular invasion, PCI score, albumin categories. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients survival can be increased. However, it is thought that cytoreductive surgery should be performed even if completeness of cytoreduction score is two. In our study we represent that >17PCI patients could be managed by CRS/HIPEC if the CC score ≤2 can be reached. Our results suggest that the CRS/HIPEC procedure can improve the benefits of larger patient group and provides longer survival. KEY WORDS: Appendiceal Neoplasms, Cytoreductive Surgery, Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Breast parenchymal density: does it affect oncological and surgical outcomes in conventional lumpectomy and oncoplastic surgery?

INTRODUCTION: Mammographic breast density (MBD) has been investigated as a risk factor for many years and has been determined to increase the risk of breast cancer in many studies. Research has shown that the correlation between MBD with breast cancer as both a risk factor and a prognostic factor is not limited to difficulty in diagnosis and patient age. This study was aimed to investigate the effect of MBD on the surgical effectiveness of different techniques applied for breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: We investigated the data of 460 patients who were prospectively registered in the database of the center between 2007-2017 and who were treated with level II Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) and conventional lumpectomy due to invasive breast cancer. RESULTS: BCS was applied to 223 (48.5%) patients, and OPS was applied to 237 (51.5%) patients. 213 (46.3%) patients had fatty breast density, and 247 (53.7%) had dense breasts. Mean surgical margin was 11.01 mm in the OPS group and 9.17 mm in the BCS group, with a statistically larger surgical margin in the OPS group (p=0.011). Regarding the surgical margin, mean distances were 10.59 mm infatty breasts and 9.70 mm in dense breasts. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, increased MBD was found to be associated with closer surgical margins and increased reoperation rates, albeit with a reduced risk for late complications. We think that level II OPS can eliminate this handicap in terms of surgical margin and reoperation in dense breasts. KEY WORDS: Breast Cancer, Breast Conserving Surgery, Breast Density, Oncoplastic Surgery.

10-years mortality risk estimation for gastric cancer patients based on clinicopathological factors.

AIM: In order to create a nomogram for the gastric cancer no comprehensive study has been performed in Turkey so far and in our study, we tried to forecast the 10-year survival by using risk factors in patients without distant metastasis, who have not previously been diagnosed with another cancer but who underwent curative surgery. MATERIAL METHOD: The data of 411 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2010 and January 2020 in Surgical Oncology Department were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: It has been shown statistically that the high RDW value point to poor survival (p <0.001). There were 173 patients with ≤3.5g/dl and 238 patients with> 3.5g/dl. It was found out statistically significant that hypoalbuminemia indicated poor survival (p <0.001). Moreover, it was determined that high CEA and Ca19-9 with lymphovascular invasion were to be statistically significant with prognosis (p <0.001). On the based of all this data, we have created a dekstop application for the mortality estimation. CONCLUSION: We think that this model will ensure individualization of the treatment for patients and will contribute to the patient's compliance with the treatment by strengthening the communication between the physician. KEY WORDS: Gastric cancer, Gastrectomy, Survival analysis, Prognosis.

The effect of CEA/Albumin ratio in gastric cancer patient on prognostic factors.

AIM: Gastric cancer is an important disease worldwide with high mortality and morbidity rates. Novel targeted treatment approaches and recent improvements in immunotherapy have significantly improved survival. New indicators that can help determine the prognosis of stomach cancer have been of interest to researchers. We evaluated and recorded the patients' final preoperative CEA/albumin ratios and investigated the effect of this ratio on lymph node involvement, pathological tumor stage, and overall survival. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We retrospectively evaluated data from electronic files of patients who were operated for stomach cancer in our center between January 2012 and December 2017. The study included 195 patients who were followed up regularly and whose complete medical data were available. RESULTS: The effect of CEA/Albumin ratio on the number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes was analyzed using Linear Regression and was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.001). One unit increase in CEA/Albumin ratio increases the number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes by 0.223 (Confidence Interval: 0.097-0.380) units, and this variable alone explains 5.7% of the change in the number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant treatment decisions can be made by estimating the T and N stages by using CEA/albumin ratio in cases where conventional radiological methods are insufficient. KEY WORDS: Albumin, Carcinoembryonic antigen, Gastric cancer, Lymph node, Prognosis.

Luminal A Breast Cancer: How Feasible is Omitting Axillary Dissection Without Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Background: Luminal A breast cancer has a good prognosis and the criteria for adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are not clear. The aim of this study was to present our results of upfront surgery and long-term survival in luminal A tumors as well as the rates of protection from axillary dissection. Material and Methods. 271 Luminal A breast cancer patients who had operated at our center were evaluated retrospectively. In patients with 2 or less sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy and underwent breast-conserving surgery, axillary lymph node dissection was omitted (OAD). Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in patients with positive SLN who did not meet these criteria (axillary dissection after sentinel/ADAS). Results: While Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) was performed in 212 (77.9%) patients, SLNB + Axillary Dissection (AD) was performed in 58 (21.3%), and direct axillary dissection was performed in 1 (0.8%) patient. OAD was applied to 18 (23.6%) of the positive patients. Discussion/Conclusions. ALND rates are still strikingly high in luminal A breast cancer treatment, despite the disease's milder clinical course. In order to avoid complications of axillary dissection, patients should be considered for NAC as much as possible. Novel neoadjuvant or other therapy options are also required.

New learning area in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: YouTube® or WebSurg®?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy cannot be performed routinely in many centres, because there is still no standardisation in the centres where it is performed, and therefore, new learning areas are needed for residents working in these centres for surgical training. These areas are various courses, video training sets and video platforms watched over the internet. The most frequently used platforms are YouTube® and WebSurg®. Our aim is to compare these two online video platforms in terms of laparoscopic gastrectomy and to evaluate the contribution of video platforms to surgical training and whether they have sufficient technical quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We made a search on YouTube® and WebSurg® using the keyword 'laparoscopic gastrectomy' on 13 November 2020. A total of 143 videos were analysed, 111 of them on YouTube® and 32 on WebSurg®. All these videos were examined by two surgical oncologists experienced in laparoscopic gastrectomy and using laparoscopy in their daily practice. RESULTS: The average video duration was 53.54 min in the YouTube® group and 18.20 min in the WebSurg® group, and this difference was found to be statistically significant between the two groups. According to the LGSS based on surgical procedures, the average score of WebSurg® videos was 10.37 and of YouTube® videos was 5.55, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Today, video platforms have started to play a major role in surgical training. Of these platforms examined, WebSurg® is superior to YouTube® in terms of education and quality, but these platforms still have some deficiencies and need regulation.

The Effects of Modified Lymphoscintigraphy Techniques on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Success During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sampling of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer provides accurate information about the condition of the axilla in 95% of cases. Technically in detecting SLN; radioactive substance, dyers or both are used. During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, delayed images were not taken in lymphoscintigraphy to reduce the risk of transmission by shortening the waiting time in our center. In this study, the effects of early and delayed lymphoscintigraphic images and only early images on our clinical practice were evaluated. METHODS: We investigated the data of 147 patients in this study who underwent SLNB due to early-stage breast cancer at our institute during the COVID-19 pandemic period (PP) (March/April/May 2020) and within 3 months before the pandemic were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients were divided into two groups, before pandemic (BP) and PP. BP consisted of patients whose early and delayed images were taken in lymphoscintigraphy whereas PP consisted of those with early images only. There were 74 patients in the BP group and 73 patients in the PP group. Early phase increased uptake was not observed in 23 patients, and increased uptake was obtained from 22 of these patients with delayed imaging in BP period. In PP, increased uptake was not observed in 12 patients. SLN was not detected in 2 patients in the BP group and 7 in the PP group. It was found that the sensitivity, NPV and accuracy of the SLNB procedure performed after taking delayed images was higher. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we believe that if technically possible, delayed images taken during the lymphoscintigraphy can assist the surgeon in terms of SLN detection and the number of SLNs removed.

The role of laparoscopic staging for the management of gastric cancer.

AIM Staging laparoscopy enables us to perform palliative treatment, neo-adjuvant therapy for curative resection or direct curative resection and making a decision with minimal morbidity by avoiding from unnecessary laparotomies. In the present study, the importance of staging lapafoscopy was retrospectively investigated by using clinical and pathologic data. METHODS Data of 70 out of 350 patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy due to gastric cancer at Surgical Oncology department between August 2013 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Peritoneal biopsy was positive for malignity in 41 (58.5%) and negative in 29 (41.5%) of the patients who underwent SL. Peritoneal cytology (PC) results were negative in 32 (45.7%) patients and positive in 38 (54.3%) patients. Peritoneal biopsy and cytology results were concurrently positive in 35 patients and concurrently negative in 26 patients. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, even the most developed imaging methods cannot provide 100% staging, therefore SL plays an important role in treatment of gastric cancer and laparoscopic staging is essential as a simple, inexpensive, safe and well tolerated method in patients who have the suspicion of peritoneal disease and who cannot be clearly evaluated with pre-operative methods.

Prognostic Role of Red Distribution Width (RDW) Value in Gastric Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic effect of red distribution width (RDW) in patients with gastric cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Surgical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, between November 2010 and January 2020. METHODOLOGY: Patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma by biopsy, who underwent radical surgery and lymph node dissection, and had preoperative RDW value, were inducted. Patients who had history of active inflammation in the past three months, received treatment for hematology disorder, blood transfusion, malignancy other than gastric cancer, autoimmune disease, venous thrombosis, or under 18 years of age, and those having cardiac and cerebrovascular diseases and distant metastases were excluded from the study. Apart from diagnosis, preoperative blood values, clinicopathologial, demographic features, and follow-up data were included in the study. RESULTS: RDW average value was 15.11 ± 2.87 and median value was 14.3%. For RDW cut off value, 13.4% was accepted as reference from previous studies was divided into two groups as <13.4% and ≥13.4%. While it was <13.4% in 119 patients; in 292 patients, it was "≥13.4%". High RDW value showed poor survival (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: RDW, the current hematological marker, can be used as an important indicator for monitoring the progression and prognosis of gastric cancer. Key Words: Gastrectomy, Gastric cancer, Laparoscopy, Surgical oncology, Red distribution width, survival.

Evaluation of Peroperative and Oncological Results in Laparoscopic Surgery of Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients: Single-Center Study.

Introduction: Laparoscopic treatment of gastric cancer in elderly patients is still controversial. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly gastric cancer patients based on the long- and short-term results of laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods: The data of 163 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Patients were categorized into two groups by age based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria: elderly (≥65 years, 80 cases) and nonelderly (<65 years, 83 cases). Patient characteristics and clinicopathological findings, surgical findings, short- and long-term results were compared between the two groups. Results: The patients in the study group were in the age range of 22-87 years and 80 (49%) patients were found out to be 65 years old or older. When all complications were categorized according to Clavien-Dindo (C-D) classification, >3 serious complication rates were similar between groups (P = .421). Although the length of hospital stay and the need for intensive care were higher in the elderly group, the difference was not significant (P = .066; P = .072). There was no significant difference between the two in terms of in-hospital mortality (P = .364). No statistically significant differences were found in the rates of overall survival (nonelderly group; 61.17 ± 3.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 54.61-67.74 versus elderly group; 56.48 ± 3.80, 95% CI: 49.03-63.93; P = .176) and disease-specific survival (nonelderly group; 64.24 ± 3.15, 95% CI: 58.06-70.40 versus elderly group; 61.93 ± 3.57, 95% CI: 54.93-68.93; P = .363) between the age groups. Conclusion: In conclusion, although laparoscopic gastrectomy is a feasible and safe method in elderly gastric cancer patients, further randomized prospective studies are needed.

The effect and clinical significance of using nathanson liver retractor on liver function tests in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

AIM: There are very few studies in the literature investigating the changes caused by the Nathanson retractors in liver function tests (LFT) after LG and its clinical significance. The present study investigated the changes made by the Nathanson retractor used during LG on LFT and its clinical significance. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The data of 236 patients, who underwent radical gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer at Surgical Oncology Unit in the period between January 2015 and January 2020 were retrospective studied. The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG; 136 cases) and open gastrectomy (OG; 106 cases). Patients who have undergone cholecystectomy, with primary or secondary liver tumors, with chronic hepatic disease, who have preoperative high ALT, AST and bilirubin values were excluded from the study. LFT were measured preoperatively and postoperative day 1 (LFT1), LFT3, LFT5 and LFT7. LFT: ALT, AST and Total bilirubin (BIL). RESULTS: ALT1, ALT3, ALT5, ALT7 ALT values and AST1, AST3, AST5 AST values of the patients in the LG group were found to be significantly higher (P <0.001). Mean total bilirubin values of the groups were similar (P >0.05). In order to evaluate how the increase in LFT due to the use of the Nathanson retractors reflected on the patients' clinic, we divided the patients who underwent LG into two groups based on ALT increase in ALT1: Normal and Elevated. The in-hospital mortality rates (P = 0.080) and oral nutrition time (P = 0.913) of the groups were similar. No liver infarction developed in any of the groups. The duration of stay in the ICU was significantly longer in individuals with elevated LFT (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Although the use of the Nathanson retractor during LG causes an increase in liver function tests, this does not cause major clinical problems in patients. Key Words: Gastrectomy; gastric cancer; laparoscopy; liver enzymes; liver dysfunciton.

Laparoscopic Gastric Resection for Gastric Cancer: Is Intracorporeal Anastomosis Necessary?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In surgical dissection, laparoscopic approach and open techniques do not differ significantly, but there is still no consensus on how anastomosis should be performed in both cardia and distal gastric tumors. Anastomosis can be performed by laparoscopy-assisted mini-laparotomy or by intracorporeal suture techniques. In this study, we aim to present our four years of clinical experience and short-term surgical results from 133 cases in order to evaluate the necessity of laparoscopic anastomosis. METHODS: This study was approved by Ethics Committee (No: 1-8-19, date: 14/01/2019). Patients who underwent curative resection with the diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2014 and January 2018 in the Ankara University Surgical Oncology Department were included in the study. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients included in the study, 108 (81.2) were male and the mean age was 60.51 ± 12.0 years. The time of anastomosis was significantly longer in patients undergoing intracorporeal anastomosis (p = 0.021). The incidence of anastomotic leakage was significantly higher in the group undergoing intracorporeal anastomosis (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: We think that esophagojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy anastomoses in patients undergoing total gastrectomy should be performed with intracorporeal techniques in terms of benefit risk assessment. We believe that it is more feasible to continue the case with mini laparotomy when anastomosis is reached in patients who are planned to have gastrojejunostomy. In addition, in terms of intracorporeal anastomoses and advanced laparoscopic techniques, intracorporeal anastomoses performed in gastric cancer surgery for a laparoscopist who has completed the learning curve do not appear to be very different in terms of anastomosis safety.

Long-Term Results and Current Problems in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: Single-Center Experience.

Introduction: The study aims to evaluate the long-term results of patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Ankara University Medical Faculty, Surgical Oncology Clinic, within 5 years. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the Surgical Oncology Clinic of Ankara University Medical Faculty between January 2014 and September 2019. One hundred forty-six patients were included in the study. Results: Fifty-one (34.9%) of the patients were female; 95 (65.1%) were male. The mean ± standard deviation and median (minimum-maximum) values of the patients were 60.92 ± 14.13 and 64.00 (22.00-93.00), respectively (Table 1). Eighty-seven (59.6%) cases were located in the antrum, 29 (19.9%) were in the cardia region, and 30 (20.5%) were in the corpus region. Overall, 106 (72.6%) of 146 patients were alive, while 40 (27.4%) were ex. The mean survival was 21.8 months (0-69). Postoperative mortality was seen in 9 patients (6.2%) and our disease-free survival rate was 70.5%. Recurrence occurred in 14 (9.6%) of all patients. [Table: see text] Conclusion: In conclusion, although laparoscopic gastrectomy is a reliable and feasible method for gastric cancer, the standardization of laparoscopic surgery is required in clinics.

Correlation between Ranson score and red cell distribution width in acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Ranson's criteria are widely used to evaluate severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has been demonstrated to be useful marker to predict mortality in these patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate correlation between Ranson score and RDW in patients with AP. METHODS: Total of 202 patients with AP were included in the study. Patients were classified as mild or severe AP, based on presence of organ failure for more than 48 hours and/or local complications. RESULTS: Forty patients (19.8%) were diagnosed as severe AP. High sensitivity and specificity values were obtained from receiver operating characteristic curve for initial RDW and Ranson score in predicting severe AP. Ranson ≥4 was selected cut-off value for Ranson score and 14% was limit for RDW. RDW at time of admission was correlated with 48-hour Ranson score (r=0.22; p<0.002). However, at day 0, there was no correlation between RDW and 0-hour Ranson score (r=0.07; p=0.600). CONCLUSION: Although there is no single, ideal method to assess severity of AP, RDW level at admission can be helpful in earlier prediction of AP severity, especially in first-line centers, taking into consideration disadvantages of multifactorial scoring systems.