Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heart Lung Circ ; 32(1): 67-78, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36463077

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: COVID-19 can be transmitted through aerosolised respiratory particles. The degree to which exercise enhances aerosol production has not been previously assessed. We aimed to quantify the size and concentration of aerosol particles and evaluate the impact of physical distance and surgical mask wearing during high intensity exercise (HIE). METHODS: Using a prospective observational crossover study, three healthy volunteers performed high intensity cardiopulmonary exercise testing at 80% of peak capacity in repeated 5-minute bouts on a cycle ergometer. Aerosol size and concentration was measured at 35, 150 and 300 cm from the participants in an anterior and lateral direction, with and without a surgical face mask, using an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS) and a Mini Wide Range Aerosol Spectrometer (MiniWRAS), with over 10,000 sample points. RESULTS: High intensity exercise generates aerosol in the 0.2-1 micrometre range. Increasing distance from the rider reduces aerosol concentrations measured by both MiniWRAS (p=0.003 for interaction) and APS (p=0.041). However, aerosol concentrations remained significantly increased above baseline measures at 300 cm from the rider. A surgical face mask reduced submicron aerosol concentrations measured anteriorly to the rider (p=0.031 for interaction) but not when measured laterally (p=0.64 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: High intensity exercise is an aerosol generating activity. Significant concentrations of aerosol particles are measurable well beyond the commonly recommended 150 cm of physical distancing. A surgical face mask reduces aerosol concentration anteriorly but not laterally to an exercising individual. Measures for safer exercise should emphasise distance and airflow and not rely solely on mask wearing.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudos Cross-Over , Aerossóis e Gotículas Respiratórios , Pulmão , Máscaras
2.
Pituitary ; 24(4): 499-506, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33469830

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the particle size, concentration, airborne duration and spread during endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery in actual patients in a theatre setting. METHODS: This observational study recruited a convenience sample of three patients. Procedures were performed in a positive pressure operating room. Particle image velocimetry and spectrometry with air sampling were used for aerosol detection. RESULTS: Intubation and extubation generated small particles (< 5 µm) in mean concentrations 12 times greater than background noise (p < 0.001). The mean particle concentrations during endonasal access were 4.5 times greater than background (p = 0.01). Particles were typically large (> 75 µm), remained airborne for up to 10 s and travelled up to 1.1 m. Use of a microdebrider generated mean aerosol concentrations 18 times above baseline (p = 0.005). High-speed drilling did not produce aerosols greater than baseline. Pituitary tumour resection generated mean aerosol concentrations less than background (p = 0.18). Surgical drape removal generated small and large particles in mean concentrations 6.4 times greater than background (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intubation and extubation generate large amounts of small particles that remain suspended in air for long durations and disperse through theatre. Endonasal access and pituitary tumour resection generate smaller concentrations of larger particles which are airborne for shorter periods and travel shorter distances.


Assuntos
Aerossóis/efeitos adversos , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/cirurgia , Extubação/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Movimento (Física) , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Saúde Ocupacional , Salas Cirúrgicas , Tamanho da Partícula , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 188(3): 311-315, 2020 Jun 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31922573

RESUMO

The Australian Radiation Laboratory Diffusion Battery was created in 1992 to evaluate radon progeny dose coefficients based on measured aerosol conditions. The Australian Radiation Laboratory Diffusion Battery used filters, alpha counters and a legacy laptop computer running a PowerBASIC program that controlled the hardware. Because technology has evolved, the original system is not supportable. A replacement system consisting of separate hardware and software modules has been created. The hardware counting module is based on the proven design of the Effective Dosimeter, using modern detectors, electronics, flow sensors, a microcontroller and a secure digital memory card for data storage. The analysis of the data has been implemented in an Excel spreadsheet with Visual Basic for Applications coding to do loops and iterations. Tests of the software with current and historic data sets, all taken with the original Australian Radiation Laboratory Diffusion Battery system, have validated a modern, supportable diffusion battery system.


Assuntos
Poluentes Radioativos do Ar , Monitoramento de Radiação , Radônio , Poluentes Radioativos do Ar/análise , Austrália , Difusão , Radônio/análise , Produtos de Decaimento de Radônio/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...