Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Case Rep ; 21: e921466, 2020 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32448864

RESUMO

BACKGROUND Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has the propensity to cause a plethora of opportunistic infections in humans owing to biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. It is often seen as a co-organism along with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CASE REPORT A 70-year-old woman with several co-morbidities presented reporting hypoglycemia and dyspnea. An imaging study of the chest was suggestive of deterioration of pneumonia, with increased opacities. Initial respiratory cultures were negative, while subsequent repeat cultures revealed the growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia susceptible to trimethoprim plus sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin. The patient had a poor prognosis and eventually died despite appropriate measures. CONCLUSIONS A decline in the clinical status of a patient such as ours makes it hard to quickly diagnose this organism correctly. Physicians should thus be cautious of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia-induced infection and more emphasis should be placed on appropriate treatment due to the emerging risk of antibiotic resistance.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/isolamento & purificação , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca/complicações , Humanos , Infecções Oportunistas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Oportunistas/microbiologia , Pneumonia/complicações , Sepse/complicações , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/patogenicidade
2.
Cureus ; 12(12): e11994, 2020 Dec 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33437549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medical errors and adverse events may affect up to 7.5% of hospitalizations, although observational studies suggest the numbers could be even higher. Previous studies have shown that medical television (TV) shows may be a major driver when it comes to a patient's medical knowledge and perspectives. METHODS: Six episodes from the first season of eight medical TV series were analyzed by four reviewers. Demographics of the healthcare provider responsible for the error, demographics of the victim, type of error, setting of error, level of disability, and reporting of the error were recorded. Data was compared with event rates from US hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 242 medical errors (average 6.4/hr) were included in the analysis. The healthcare provider responsible for the error was often an attending physician (55.8%), while victims were often White (73.6%), males (55.0%), aged 16-44 years (50.8%). Errors in diagnosis (28.9%) and operative errors (19.4%) were most common. Compared with data from US hospitals, TV series depicted more errors in diagnosis (p<0.001) and fewer operative errors (p<0.001). The most common levels of disability following medical errors were emotional trauma (37.6%) and temporary injury (30.2%). Emotional trauma was significantly overrepresented and temporary injuries were underrepresented (p<0.001). Error was not reported to the victim in 49.2% of events. CONCLUSION: There were multiple discrepancies between errors depicted on TV and US hospital data. This may lead to viewer fear and anxiety that results in delays in seeking medical care and increased medicolegal cases. Healthcare systems should attempt to reduce the incidence of medical errors and adverse events by ensuring competencies of their providers, instituting methods of risk analysis and prevention, and training providers on methods of proper error disclosure.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...