Efficacy of EUS-guided and ERCP-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: prospective randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ERCP-guided biliary drainage (ERCP-BD) is a criterion standard treatment for malignant biliary obstruction when curative surgery is not an option. Alternative methods such as percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage would significantly lower the quality of life. EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been developed and performed by experienced endoscopists. Therefore, the aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD compared with ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. METHODS: The prospective randomized controlled study was conducted, and 30 patients were enrolled: 15 for each EUS-BD and ERCP-BD arms. The technical success, procedural time, clinical success, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty patients had extrahepatic malignant biliary tract obstruction (19 men, 11 women). Twenty-seven patients had unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, 1 patient had distal common bile duct cancer, and 2 patients had metastatic malignant lymphadenopathy. There were no significant differences both in terms of technical success rate and clinical success rate (100% vs 93% and 93% vs 100% in ERCP-BD vs EUS-BD, respectively; P = 1.00, P = 1.00). Four patients (31%) had tumor ingrowth-caused stent dysfunction in the ERCP-BD group, whereas 2 patients had food impaction and 2 patients had stent migration in the EUS-BD group. No significant procedure-related adverse events occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomized controlled study suggests that EUS-BD has similar safety to ERCP-BD. EUS-BD was not superior to ERCP-BD in terms of relief of malignant biliary obstruction. EUS-BD may have fewer cases of tumor ingrowth but may also have more cases of food impaction or stent migration. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01421836.).

Discovery and Validation of Biomarkers That Distinguish Mucinous and Nonmucinous Pancreatic Cysts.

The use of advanced imaging technologies for the identification of pancreatic cysts has become widespread. However, accurate differential diagnosis between mucinous cysts (MC) and nonmucinous cysts (NMC) consisting of pseudocysts (NMC1) and nonmucinous neoplastic cysts (NMC2) remains a challenge. Thus, it is necessary to develop novel biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. An integrated proteomics approach yielded differentially expressed proteins in MC that were verified subsequently in 99 pancreatic cysts (21 NMC1, 41 NMC2, and 37 MC) using a method termed GeLC-stable isotope dilution-multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (GeLC-SID-MRM-MS) along with established immunoassay techniques. We identified 223 proteins by nanoscale liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (nano LC/MS-MS). Nine candidate biomarkers were identified, including polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (PIGR), lipocalin 2 (LCN2), Fc fragment of IgG-binding protein (FCGBP), lithostathine-1-alpha (REG1A), afamin (AFM), chymotrypsin C (caldecrin; CTRC), amylase, alpha 2B (pancreatic; AMY2B), lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 3 binding protein (LGALS3BP), and chymotrypsin-like elastase family, member 3A (CELA3A), which were established as biomarker candidates for MC. In particular, we have shown that a biomarker subset, including AFM, REG1A, PIGR, and LCN2, could differentiate MC not only from NMC (including NMC1) but also from NMC2. Overall, the MS-based comprehensive proteomics approach used in this study established a novel set of candidate biomarkers that address a gap in efforts to distinguish early pancreatic lesions at a time when more successful therapeutic interventions may be possible.

Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic duodenal ampullectomy: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We investigated the efficacy of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for preventing postprocedure pancreatitis in patients undergoing endoscopic papillectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study included 82 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic papillectomy for benign ampullary neoplasm at Samsung Medical Center between August 2002 and June 2011. The patients were subdivided into two groups, namely, those who received prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and those who did not. Patient demographics, baseline blood test, tumor characteristics, and endoscopic treatment data were collected. The primary endpoint was postprocedure pancreatitis. RESULTS: There was no difference in the development of postprocedure pancreatitis between the stent group and the no stent group (6/54, 10.5% and 2/28, 7.14%, respectively; p=1.00). At baseline, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of their risk factors for pancreatitis except pancreatic duct dye injection. The stent group was more likely to have dye injection than the nonstent group (100% vs 42.8%, p<0.001). However, in a logistic regression analysis, no significant difference was observed in the risk factors for pancreatitis including dye injection. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that routine prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement in all patients undergoing endoscopic papillectomy may not be necessary and that large-scale prospective studies are required to identify the subgroup of patients who would benefit.

Factors associated with vaccination among inflammatory bowel disease patients in Korea.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Vaccinations are generally recommended in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, several studies showed low rates of vaccinations in IBD patients. Furthermore, vaccination rate among IBD patients in Korea has never been investigated. We investigated the vaccination rate among IBD patients in Korea and evaluated some factors that might affect the vaccination rate. METHODS: From November 2011 to February 2012, a total of 192 patients with IBD who visited Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) answered the IRB-approved questionnaire. The questionnaire included their sex, age, residence, past medical history, type of IBD, duration of illness, medications, history of vaccination about measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), varicella, tetanus-diphtheria (Td), influenza, hepatitis A and B, pneumococcus and human papilloma virus (HPV). RESULTS: One hundred twenty one (63.0%) male and 71 (37.0%) female answered the questionnaire. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 39.7 (18-76) years. Eighty four patients (43.8%) had ulcerative colitis and 108 patients (56.3%) had Crohn's disease (CD). The percentage of the patients who had got vaccination was 42.2% for MMR, 34.9% for varicella, 15.6% for Td, 37.5% for influenza, 15.6% for hepatitis A, 52.6% for hepatitis B, 6.3% for pneumococcus and 11.3% for HPV respectively. Not knowing the necessity or the existence were the common reasons for non-vaccination. Age less than 40 years, CD patients and duration of illness less than 10 years were associated with a higher vaccination rate (p=0.002, 0.015 and 0.020, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Immunization rates for recommended vaccinations were very low in patients with IBD. Efforts to improve vaccination rate are needed.

Clinicoradiologic characteristics and outcomes of metastatic cancer to the pancreas and double primary pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to identify clinicoradiologic characteristics to distinguish metastatic cancer to the pancreas (MCP) from double primary pancreatic cancer (DPPC). METHODS: From 2000 to 2011, we retrospectively identified MCP and DPPC patients among patients with histories of other primary malignancies. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients with histories of other primary malignancies were histologically confirmed to have pancreatic cancer. Among them, 34 patients had MCP and 60 patients had DPPC, which were ductal adenocarcinomas. The kidney was the most common primary cancer site that metastasized to the pancreas (12, 35.3%). In the DPPC group, the stomach was the most common primary cancer site (11, 18.3%). There were 21 patients (61.8%) with metachronous pancreatic cancer in the MCP group and 29 (48.3%) in the DPPC group (P=0.210). Among the metachronous pancreatic cancer patients, the disease-free interval was 88.3 months in the MCP group, and 49.6 months in the DPPC group (P=0.062). The number of the patients who showed elevated CA 19-9 levels was higher in the DPPC group than in the MCP group (39 (65%) vs. 9 (26.5%); P=0.001). Total bilirubin (P=0.006) and fasting plasma glucose (P=0.050) were also higher in the DPPC group. The numbers of patients who showed pancreatic duct dilatation (P=0.002) and pancreatic atrophy (P=0.008) on radiographs were meaningfully higher in the DPPC group than in the MCP group. On the other hand, the numbers of patients who showed well demarcated tumor margin (P<0.000), tumor necrosis (P=0.002), enhancement (P=0.005) and distant metastasis (P=0.028) were significantly higher in the MCP group than in the DPPC group. We evaluated differences in survival between the two groups. The median survival time in the MCP group (55 months) was significantly longer than that in the DPPC group (20 months). CONCLUSIONS: Other than elevated levels of CA 19-9, total bilirubin and fasting glucose, radiologic findings were the most reliable factors for distinguishing the MCP from the DPPC.

Influence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease on the prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with multiple adenomatous polyps and advanced neoplasm. This study aims to investigate the influence of NAFLD on the tumor characteristics and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We analyzed 227 patients who were first diagnosed with CRC and underwent abdominal ultrasonography within six months prior to diagnosis at Samsung Medical Center between 2000 and 2005. RESULTS: Of the study population, 26.0% were diagnosed with NAFLD. Upon baseline comparison, CRC patients with NAFLD had higher BMI and ALT values than CRC patients without NAFLD (25.3 ± 2.7 vs. 22.6 ± 3.0, P=0.000 and 26.6 ± 17.4 vs. 21.2 ± 14.0, P=0.018, respectively). Additionally, CRC patients with NAFLD were diagnosed earlier than CRC patients without NAFLD (P=0.004). However, there were no significant differences between two groups with regard to location and differentiation of tumors, CEA or numbers of synchronous adenoma and advanced adenoma. The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates in CRC patients with NAFLD were 98.3%, 89.8%, and 86.4%, respectively, which were higher but statistically not significant than 90.4%, 79.6%, and 74.8%, respectively, in CRC patients without NAFLD (P=0.079). During follow-up, freedom from recurrence was similarly observed in CRC patients with and without NAFLD (89.8% and 87.3%, respectively, P=0.614). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the presence of NAFLD does not influence on the prognosis in CRC patients, especially with respect to disease recurrence during follow-up.

[A case of benign schwannoma in the ascending colon].

Schwannomas are rare tumors derived from the cells of Schwann which form the neural sheath. Some patients with gastrointestinal schwannoma have been previously reported in the literature. However, schwannomas of the colon are extremely rare. We herein describe a case of schwannoma of the colon. A 49-year-old woman was admitted with complaint of abdominal pain and investigations revealed the presence of a 4 cm sized mass in the ascending colon. Following right hemicolectomy, histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the colonic lesion to be a benign schwannoma. There was no evidence of specific complication or recurrence until now.