[Back pain: patients versus research]. / Rugpijn: patiënten versus onderzoek.

In 2008, approximately 1,559,000 Dutch patients consulted their GP because of back pain. One out of 20 back pain patients is ultimately referred to a specialist, most often to a neurologist. A smaller number (also) go to a neurosurgeon or orthopaedist. Once referred, patients often receive treatments such as pain killers or discectomy. Scientific evidence in systematic reviews is scarce for the treatments we investigated because of small patient groups and a lack of randomised research. We made an infographic to show the numbers of patients with back pain who visit their GP or a specialist.

Accuracy of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin in the detection of excessive alcohol consumption: a systematic review.

AIMS: Excessive alcohol consumption is a common problem in society and medical practice. There is a need for a diagnostic tool with both high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of excessive alcohol consumption in unselected medical populations. Therefore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) in the detection of excessive alcohol consumption. METHODS: Computerised literature searches in Medline, Embase and Current Contents databases (01/1966-06/2003) and reference checking. Articles on the detection of excessive alcohol consumption reporting CDT levels and self-reported alcohol consumption as a reference test were selected (n = 101). Studies concerning treatment, relapse detection and traffic offenders were excluded. Quality assessment and data-extraction was done by two reviewers independently. Only studies scoring positive on core validity criteria by Lijmer were eligible for quantitative analysis (n = 29). RESULTS: Only two CDT-assays (CDTect and CDTriTIA) were evaluated in more than two high validity studies fulfilling the criteria for inclusion in the statistical analysis. Sensitivity of CDTect (14 data points) ranged from 20 to 85%, whereas specificity ranged from 77 to 95%. A summary ROC curve was computed for CDTect. Sensitivity of CDTTriTIA (4 data points) ranged from 10 to 67%, and specificity ranged from 90 to 100%. No summary measure could be computed for CDTTriTIA. The heterogeneity of results could not be explained clinically. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of CDT as a diagnostic tool is still questionable. If the higher values for sensitivity that some studies report can be confirmed by others it is a useful diagnostic tool in unselected populations. However, more methodologically sound, comparable studies need to be performed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice.

BACKGROUND: The use of clinical guidelines in general practice is often limited. Research on barriers to guideline adherence usually focuses on attitudinal factors. Factors linked to the guideline itself are much less studied. AIM: To identify characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice, and to explore whether these differ between therapeutic and diagnostic recommendations. DESIGN OF STUDY: Analysis of performance data from an audit study of 200 general practitioners (GPs) in The Netherlands conducted in 1997. SETTING: Panel of 12 GPs in The Netherlands who were familiar with guideline methodology. METHOD: A set of 12 attributes, including six potential facilitators and six potential barriers to guideline use, was formulated. The panel assessed the presence of these attributes in 96 guideline recommendations formulated by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. The attributes of recommendations with high compliance rates (70% to 100%) were compared with those with low compliance rates (0% to 60%). RESULTS: Recommendations with high compliance rates were to a lesser extent those requiring new skills (7% compared with 22% in recommendations with low compliance rates), were less often part of a complex decision tree (12% versus 25%), were more compatible with existing norms and values in practice (87% versus 76%), and more often supported with evidence (47% versus 31%). For diagnostic recommendations, the ease of applying them and the potential (negative) reactions of patients were more relevant than for therapeutic recommendations. CONCLUSION: To bridge the gap between research and practice, the evidence as well as the applicability should be considered when formulating recommendations. If the recommendations are not compatible with existing norms and values, not easy to follow or require new knowledge and skills, appropriate implementation strategies should be designed to ensure change in daily practice.

Development and feasibility of a modified reattribution model for somatising patients, applied by their own general practitioners.

Reattribution has been developed as a cognitive-behavioural treatment model for somatisation in general practice. Our objective is to make reattribution suitable for application on patients with long-standing somatisation, including hypochondria, and to evaluate feasibility. Three modifications were developed: (1) dealing with persistent illness worry, (2) adjustment of the doctor's speed to that of the patient, and (3) the use of symptom diaries. Performance of ten experienced general practitioners (GPs), after a 20h training programme (six sessions of variable length), was measured by self-registrations and audio-taped consultations. GPs were interviewed on factors interfering with performance. Nine GPs completed the course. Reattribution was applied to 51 out of 75 indicated somatising patients, which required on average three consultations of 10-30min duration. We conclude that the modified reattribution model offers a feasible approach to the broad spectrum of somatisation seen in general practice; only the modification 'dealing with illness worry' showed limited feasibility.