Capsular distension in high-energy femoral shaft fractures is associated with occult femoral neck fracture: a preliminary retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between hip capsular distension, the computed tomography (CT) capsular sign, and lipohemarthrosis as they relate to occult femoral neck fracture (FNF) in the setting of ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture (FSF). DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-two patients with high-energy FSF and no evidence of FNF on preoperative radiographs and pelvis CT. All patients were stabilized with non-reconstruction style nails. INTERVENTION: Pelvis CT scans were examined for hip capsular distension irrespective of the other side, differing side-to-side measurements of capsular distension (i.e., the CT capsular sign), and lipohemarthrosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: FNF was observed for on postoperative radiographs. Relative risk (RR), number needed to treat (NNT), sensitivity (SN), and specificity (SP) were determined. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (24.0%) had capsular distension. Forty-two patients (17.4%) had differing capsular measurements (i.e., the CT capsular sign), and 16 (6.6%) had symmetrical distension from bilateral hip effusions. Eight patients (3.3%) had lipohemarthrosis. Four FNFs (1.7%) were identified. Three patients had capsular distension, 2 had CT capsular signs, and 1 had lipohemarthrosis. The last patient had no CT abnormalities. Only capsular distension (RR = 10, CI = 1.001-90, P = 0.049; SN = 75%, SP = 77%; NNT = 22) and lipohemarthrosis (RR = 23, CI = 1.6-335, P = 0.022; SN = 50%, SP = 96%; NNT = 8) were associated with occult FNF. CONCLUSIONS: Capsular distension is associated with FNF irrespective of the contralateral hip. Preemptive stabilization using a reconstruction nail could be considered in the setting of capsular distension or lipohemarthrosis to prevent displacement of an occult FNF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.

International Medical Graduates in Radiology Residencies: Demographics, Performance, and Visa Issues.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The number of international medical graduates (IMG) in radiology residencies has varied from year to year even as the number of candidates continues to grow. It is unclear from which countries the IMGs are arriving and what visas are being used to accommodate them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We sent a survey to 195 program directors (PD) in diagnostic radiology (DR) inquiring about the number and nationality of IMG residents in their program, their attitudes about IMG candidates, the performance of their IMG trainees, and the visas that are offered. RESULTS: We received responses from 121 of 195 (62.1%) DR programs (121/149 =81.2% of actionable emails). 80/121 (66.1%) had at least one IMG in their DR residency program and the countries of origin included India (36), Iran (30), Saudi Arabia (24), Egypt (16), Canada (14), Brazil (14), and Pakistan (9), as the most common. While most programs (76/104, 73.1%) offered J1 visas, 23/99 (23.2%) provided H-1B visas to trainees. IMG DR residents overall performed as well as American graduates, with an equal number of PDs saying IMGs performed better and worse than American graduates. PDs' issues with IMGs centered on visas: (1) expense, (2) lack of familiarity, (3) Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates regulations, and (4) time commitment in submitting paperwork. CONCLUSION: Most radiology IMG residents originate from India and Middle Eastern countries. Once enrolled, IMG residents perform similarly to US graduates. However, adding IMG candidates to the training program requires overcoming bureaucratic and monetary hurdles around visas. SUMMARY SENTENCE: Most DR international medical graduate residents are from India or the Middle East. Although their performance is the same as American graduates in general, PDs note the monetary and bureaucratic hassles accompanying their recruitment.

Imaging Tendon Disorders in Athletes.

Imaging plays a critical role in evaluating pathology affecting athletes from various fields. Tendon pathology manifests in terms of mechanical, degenerative, enthesitis, neoplastic, and overuse diseases. Tendon pathologies in athletes usually involve injuries to commonly injured tendons such as the tendons involving the ankle, elbow, rotator cuff, hip abductors, patellar tendon, and Achilles tendon. For the purposes of this article, the focus will be on the tendons involving the ankle such as the tibialis posterior and peroneal tendons. The 2 most common imaging modalities used for the evaluation of tendons are ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There are several emerging imaging techniques such as T2 mapping, ultra-short echo time MRI, and sonoelastography. These novel imaging techniques are all in research phase and have not been adapted to routine clinical practice.