Comparison of low level and high power laser combined with kinesiology taping on shoulder function and musculoskeletal sonography parameters in subacromial impingement syndrome: a Randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS) is a common cause of shoulder pain. The effects of physiotherapy modalities including low-level laser (LLL) and high power laser (HPL) on the SAIS have mostly been evaluated by the subjective outcome variables accompanied with the controversial findings and none of them has compared a combination of these two modalities, yet. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of low-level laser (LLL) and high power laser (HPL) combined with kinesiology taping (KT), on the pain, function, and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) parameters in the SAIS. METHODS: Thirty patients with SAIS were randomly divided into the LLL-KT, HPL-KT, and sham-KT groups, respectively. Patients received seven treatment sessions. Visual analogue scale (VAS), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), MSKUS parameters were measured before and 48 hours after the treatment cessation. RESULTS: Pain intensity significantly reduced in the LLL-KT (-2.43 (0.97)), HPL-KT (-3.43 (1.99)), and sham-KT (-2.43 (1.62)) (P < .01). All the SPADI subscales are significantly reduced in all the groups (P < .05), except for the pain in the sham-KT (P = .06). Significant improvements were only observed in the diameters of biceps (P < .05), supraspinatus tendon thickness in short and long axes (P < .05), occupation ratio (P = .004), and echogenicity (P = .03) in the HPL-KT. Although the acromiohumoral distance (AHD) significantly increased in all the groups including the sham-KT (P < .01), supraspinatus tendon thickness significantly decreased (P < .05), and echogenicity increased (P = .003) just in the HPL-KT. CONCLUSIONS: Kinesiology taping method alone is an effective intervention. Nevertheless, adding the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of both LLL and HPL to KT seems to result in better improvement of the pain, function, and MSKUS parameters in the SAIS. Findings of this study suggested that the HPL is more beneficial than the LLL or KT alone for management of the patients with SAIS.

Performance characteristics of several rules for self-interpretation of proficiency testing data.

CONTEXT: Proficiency testing (PT) participants can interpret their results to detect errors even when their performance is acceptable according to the limits set by the PT provider. OBJECTIVE: To determine which rules for interpreting PT data provide optimal performance for PT with 5 samples per event. DESIGN: We used Monte Carlo computer simulation techniques to study the performance of several rules, relating their error detection capabilities to (1) the analytic quality of the method, (2) the probability of failing PT, and (3) the ratio of the peer group SD to the mean intralaboratory SD. Analytic quality is indicated by the ratio of the PT allowable error to the intralaboratory SD. Failure of PT was defined (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988) as an event when 2 or more results out of 5 exceeded acceptable limits. We investigated rules with limits based on the SD index, the mean SD index, and percentages of allowable error. RESULTS: No single rule performs optimally across the range of method quality. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend further investigation when PT data cause rejection by any of the following 3 rules: any result exceeds 75% of allowable error, the difference between any 2 results exceeds 4 times the peer group SD, or the mean SD index of all 5 results exceeds 1.5. As method quality increases from marginal to high, false rejections range from 16% to nearly zero, and the probability of detecting a shift equal to 2 times the intralaboratory SD ranges from 94% to 69%.